Ultrasound-Guided Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block: Single Bolus Injection versus Continuous Catheter Placement in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair with Implications for Postoperative Rehabilitation - A Prospective Randomized Unblinded Trial.

IF 1.8 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Local and Regional Anesthesia Pub Date : 2026-08-03 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2147/LRA.S595813
Renata Beck, Pietro Palumbo, Antonella Cotoia, Giuseppe Maccagnano, Domenico Merlicco, Angelo A Carrideo, Lucia Distaso, Mario Pedone, Emanuele Pio Ricci, Michela Rauseo, Lada Zibar, Gilda Cinnella
{"title":"Ultrasound-Guided Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block: Single Bolus Injection versus Continuous Catheter Placement in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair with Implications for Postoperative Rehabilitation - A Prospective Randomized Unblinded Trial.","authors":"Renata Beck, Pietro Palumbo, Antonella Cotoia, Giuseppe Maccagnano, Domenico Merlicco, Angelo A Carrideo, Lucia Distaso, Mario Pedone, Emanuele Pio Ricci, Michela Rauseo, Lada Zibar, Gilda Cinnella","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S595813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examined the effectiveness of the interscalene brachial plexus single-shot block (ISBSS) versus continuous block (ISBC) in managing acute and chronic postsurgical pain (PSP) in patients undergoing upper extremity surgery, and differences between the two groups in rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy under locoregional anesthesia received either single-shot (ISBSS group) (n = 42) or continuous perineural catheter (ISBC group) anesthesia (n = 38). The primary outcome was the numeric rating scale (NRS) score related to PSP evaluation. Secondary outcomes included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES), range of motion (ROM) in degrees, hospital length of stay, and opioid consumption, all measured postoperatively and during the rehabilitation evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ISBC group exhibited lower median [interquartile range, IQR] NRS score than ISBSS group at postoperative hour 20 (2 [2 to 3] vs 4 [2 to 5]), 24 (2 [2 to 2] vs 4 [1 to 5]), 48 (1 [1 to 2] vs 4 [4 to 5]), 72 (1.5 [1 to 2] vs 5 [4 to 5]) (<i>P</i> < 0.001, resp.); at postoperative day 7 (1 [1 to 2] vs 5 [5 to 6], <i>P</i> < 0.001) and postoperative month 1 (1 [1 to 1] vs 3 [3 to 3], <i>P</i> < 0.001). The ISBC group demonstrated lower opioid consumption, a better ASES score, and higher ROM grades at follow-up month 3 for flexion, abduction, and internal and external rotation (<i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Continuous interscalene brachial plexus catheter infusion may effectively control acute and chronic PSP, facilitating better rehabilitation and healing than single shot injection.</p>","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":"19 ","pages":"595813"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13450620/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S595813","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study examined the effectiveness of the interscalene brachial plexus single-shot block (ISBSS) versus continuous block (ISBC) in managing acute and chronic postsurgical pain (PSP) in patients undergoing upper extremity surgery, and differences between the two groups in rehabilitation.

Patients and methods: Patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy under locoregional anesthesia received either single-shot (ISBSS group) (n = 42) or continuous perineural catheter (ISBC group) anesthesia (n = 38). The primary outcome was the numeric rating scale (NRS) score related to PSP evaluation. Secondary outcomes included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES), range of motion (ROM) in degrees, hospital length of stay, and opioid consumption, all measured postoperatively and during the rehabilitation evaluation.

Results: ISBC group exhibited lower median [interquartile range, IQR] NRS score than ISBSS group at postoperative hour 20 (2 [2 to 3] vs 4 [2 to 5]), 24 (2 [2 to 2] vs 4 [1 to 5]), 48 (1 [1 to 2] vs 4 [4 to 5]), 72 (1.5 [1 to 2] vs 5 [4 to 5]) (P < 0.001, resp.); at postoperative day 7 (1 [1 to 2] vs 5 [5 to 6], P < 0.001) and postoperative month 1 (1 [1 to 1] vs 3 [3 to 3], P < 0.001). The ISBC group demonstrated lower opioid consumption, a better ASES score, and higher ROM grades at follow-up month 3 for flexion, abduction, and internal and external rotation (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Continuous interscalene brachial plexus catheter infusion may effectively control acute and chronic PSP, facilitating better rehabilitation and healing than single shot injection.

超声引导下斜角肌间臂丛阻滞:关节镜下肩袖修复中单次注射与连续置管对术后康复的影响——一项前瞻性随机非盲试验。
目的:本研究探讨斜角肌间臂丛单次阻滞(ISBSS)与连续阻滞(ISBC)对上肢手术患者急性和慢性术后疼痛(PSP)的治疗效果,以及两组康复效果的差异。患者和方法:在局部麻醉下接受肩关节镜检查的患者分别接受单针麻醉(ISBSS组)(n = 42)或连续神经周导管麻醉(ISBC组)(n = 38)。主要结果是与PSP评估相关的数字评定量表(NRS)得分。次要结果包括美国肩关节外科医生评分(ASES)、活动度(ROM)、住院时间和阿片类药物消耗,所有这些都是在术后和康复评估期间测量的。结果:ISBC组在术后20小时的NRS评分中位数[四分位数范围,IQR]低于ISBSS组(2[2 ~ 3]比4[2 ~ 5]),24(2[2 ~ 2]比4[1 ~ 5]),48(1[1 ~ 2]比4[4 ~ 5]),72(1.5[1 ~ 2]比5 [4 ~ 5])(P < 0.001, resp);术后第7天(1 [1 ~ 2]vs . 5 [5 ~ 6], P < 0.001)和术后第1个月(1 [1 ~ 1]vs . 3 [3 ~ 3], P < 0.001)。ISBC组在屈曲、外展和内外旋的随访第3个月时表现出更低的阿片类药物消耗,更好的as评分和更高的ROM等级(P < 0.001)。结论:持续斜角肌间臂丛导管输注可有效控制急慢性PSP,比单次注射更有利于康复和愈合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书