Robust Inference With Ghostknockoffs in Genome-Wide Association Studies With Sample Relatedness

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Xinran Qi, Michael E. Belloy, Jiaqi Gu, Xiaoxia Liu, Hua Tang, Zihuai He
{"title":"Robust Inference With Ghostknockoffs in Genome-Wide Association Studies With Sample Relatedness","authors":"Xinran Qi,&nbsp;Michael E. Belloy,&nbsp;Jiaqi Gu,&nbsp;Xiaoxia Liu,&nbsp;Hua Tang,&nbsp;Zihuai He","doi":"10.1002/gepi.70051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have been extensively adopted to depict the underlying genetic architecture of complex traits. Recent studies show that knockoff-based methods can identify variants with unique, potentially causal effects on phenotypes. However, their statistical validity and effectiveness in studies with related individuals, such as the UK Biobank, remain unexplored. In this paper, we extensively evaluate a simple and effective analytical strategy that integrates GhostKnockoffs and state-of-the-art marginal association tests. We show that this approach is robust to arbitrary relatedness structure as long as the input <i>Z</i>-scores are derived from valid generalized linear mixed models. This robustness also extends GhostKnockoffs to other GWASs settings, including meta-analysis of studies with sample overlap when the input score test <i>Z</i>-scores are properly calibrated, and association test statistics beyond score tests in independent sample settings. We demonstrate the method's validity and practical utility using simulation studies and a meta-analysis of nine European ancestral genome-wide association studies and whole exome/genome sequencing studies for the Alzheimer's disease.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12710,"journal":{"name":"Genetic Epidemiology","volume":"50 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetic Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gepi.70051","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have been extensively adopted to depict the underlying genetic architecture of complex traits. Recent studies show that knockoff-based methods can identify variants with unique, potentially causal effects on phenotypes. However, their statistical validity and effectiveness in studies with related individuals, such as the UK Biobank, remain unexplored. In this paper, we extensively evaluate a simple and effective analytical strategy that integrates GhostKnockoffs and state-of-the-art marginal association tests. We show that this approach is robust to arbitrary relatedness structure as long as the input Z-scores are derived from valid generalized linear mixed models. This robustness also extends GhostKnockoffs to other GWASs settings, including meta-analysis of studies with sample overlap when the input score test Z-scores are properly calibrated, and association test statistics beyond score tests in independent sample settings. We demonstrate the method's validity and practical utility using simulation studies and a meta-analysis of nine European ancestral genome-wide association studies and whole exome/genome sequencing studies for the Alzheimer's disease.

在样本相关性的全基因组关联研究中与幽灵仿制品的稳健推断。
全基因组关联研究(GWASs)已被广泛用于描述复杂性状的潜在遗传结构。最近的研究表明,基于仿冒品的方法可以识别对表型具有独特的潜在因果影响的变异。然而,它们在相关个体(如英国生物银行)研究中的统计有效性和有效性仍未得到探索。在本文中,我们广泛评估了一个简单而有效的分析策略,集成了GhostKnockoffs和最先进的边际关联测试。我们表明,只要输入z分数来自有效的广义线性混合模型,这种方法对任意相关性结构都具有鲁棒性。这种稳健性也将GhostKnockoffs扩展到其他GWASs设置,包括对样本重叠的研究进行meta分析,当输入分数测试z分数得到适当校准时,以及在独立样本设置中超越分数测试的关联测试统计。我们通过模拟研究和对9个欧洲祖先全基因组关联研究和阿尔茨海默病全外显子组/基因组测序研究的荟萃分析,证明了该方法的有效性和实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Genetic Epidemiology
Genetic Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
9.50%
发文量
49
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Genetic Epidemiology is a peer-reviewed journal for discussion of research on the genetic causes of the distribution of human traits in families and populations. Emphasis is placed on the relative contribution of genetic and environmental factors to human disease as revealed by genetic, epidemiological, and biologic investigations. Genetic Epidemiology primarily publishes papers in statistical genetics, a research field that is primarily concerned with development of statistical, bioinformatical, and computational models for analyzing genetic data. Incorporation of underlying biology and population genetics into conceptual models is favored. The Journal seeks original articles comprising either applied research or innovative statistical, mathematical, computational, or genomic methodologies that advance studies in genetic epidemiology. Other types of reports are encouraged, such as letters to the editor, topic reviews, and perspectives from other fields of research that will likely enrich the field of genetic epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书