Xinran Qi, Michael E. Belloy, Jiaqi Gu, Xiaoxia Liu, Hua Tang, Zihuai He
{"title":"Robust Inference With Ghostknockoffs in Genome-Wide Association Studies With Sample Relatedness","authors":"Xinran Qi, Michael E. Belloy, Jiaqi Gu, Xiaoxia Liu, Hua Tang, Zihuai He","doi":"10.1002/gepi.70051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have been extensively adopted to depict the underlying genetic architecture of complex traits. Recent studies show that knockoff-based methods can identify variants with unique, potentially causal effects on phenotypes. However, their statistical validity and effectiveness in studies with related individuals, such as the UK Biobank, remain unexplored. In this paper, we extensively evaluate a simple and effective analytical strategy that integrates GhostKnockoffs and state-of-the-art marginal association tests. We show that this approach is robust to arbitrary relatedness structure as long as the input <i>Z</i>-scores are derived from valid generalized linear mixed models. This robustness also extends GhostKnockoffs to other GWASs settings, including meta-analysis of studies with sample overlap when the input score test <i>Z</i>-scores are properly calibrated, and association test statistics beyond score tests in independent sample settings. We demonstrate the method's validity and practical utility using simulation studies and a meta-analysis of nine European ancestral genome-wide association studies and whole exome/genome sequencing studies for the Alzheimer's disease.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12710,"journal":{"name":"Genetic Epidemiology","volume":"50 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetic Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gepi.70051","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have been extensively adopted to depict the underlying genetic architecture of complex traits. Recent studies show that knockoff-based methods can identify variants with unique, potentially causal effects on phenotypes. However, their statistical validity and effectiveness in studies with related individuals, such as the UK Biobank, remain unexplored. In this paper, we extensively evaluate a simple and effective analytical strategy that integrates GhostKnockoffs and state-of-the-art marginal association tests. We show that this approach is robust to arbitrary relatedness structure as long as the input Z-scores are derived from valid generalized linear mixed models. This robustness also extends GhostKnockoffs to other GWASs settings, including meta-analysis of studies with sample overlap when the input score test Z-scores are properly calibrated, and association test statistics beyond score tests in independent sample settings. We demonstrate the method's validity and practical utility using simulation studies and a meta-analysis of nine European ancestral genome-wide association studies and whole exome/genome sequencing studies for the Alzheimer's disease.
期刊介绍:
Genetic Epidemiology is a peer-reviewed journal for discussion of research on the genetic causes of the distribution of human traits in families and populations. Emphasis is placed on the relative contribution of genetic and environmental factors to human disease as revealed by genetic, epidemiological, and biologic investigations.
Genetic Epidemiology primarily publishes papers in statistical genetics, a research field that is primarily concerned with development of statistical, bioinformatical, and computational models for analyzing genetic data. Incorporation of underlying biology and population genetics into conceptual models is favored. The Journal seeks original articles comprising either applied research or innovative statistical, mathematical, computational, or genomic methodologies that advance studies in genetic epidemiology. Other types of reports are encouraged, such as letters to the editor, topic reviews, and perspectives from other fields of research that will likely enrich the field of genetic epidemiology.