Frequency of anti-neural antibodies and autoimmune epilepsy in focal epilepsy of unknown etiology: An observational study in a Singaporean cohort.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Epilepsia Open Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-08 DOI:10.1002/epi4.70327
Seong Jin Park, Jeanne May May Tan, Xuejuan Peng, Patricia Yut Wan Wong, Karine Su Shan Tay, Angelia Swee Hoon Koe, Janis Siew Noi Tye, Josiah Yui Huei Chai, Pei Xuan Koh, Yee Leng Tan, Sheila Srinivasan, Ngai Kun Loh, Nigel Choon Kiat Tan, Kevin Tan, Tianrong Yeo
{"title":"Frequency of anti-neural antibodies and autoimmune epilepsy in focal epilepsy of unknown etiology: An observational study in a Singaporean cohort.","authors":"Seong Jin Park, Jeanne May May Tan, Xuejuan Peng, Patricia Yut Wan Wong, Karine Su Shan Tay, Angelia Swee Hoon Koe, Janis Siew Noi Tye, Josiah Yui Huei Chai, Pei Xuan Koh, Yee Leng Tan, Sheila Srinivasan, Ngai Kun Loh, Nigel Choon Kiat Tan, Kevin Tan, Tianrong Yeo","doi":"10.1002/epi4.70327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Autoimmune epilepsy (AES) is increasingly recognized as a condition in patients with epilepsy of unknown etiology. Early immunotherapy improves outcomes; however, data on its prevalence and the frequency of anti-neural/neuronal antibodies in Asian populations remain scarce. Herein, we aim to (1) evaluate the frequency of serum anti-neuronal/neural antibodies, (2) compare the clinical characteristics between seropositive and seronegative patients, and (3) explore the clinical utility of the ACES (Antibodies Contributing to Focal Epilepsy Signs and Symptoms) score in diagnosing AES in a cohort of Singaporean patients with focal epilepsy of unknown etiology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional, observational, single-center study performed at the National Neuroscience Institute (NNI), Singapore. Patients with focal epilepsy of unknown etiology were prospectively recruited. Serum samples were tested using both cell-based (CBA) and immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based tissue assays. Patients were classified into definite, probable, and possible AES based on antibody positivity. Clinical characteristics, MRI and EEG findings, and ACES scores were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-hundred-and-twenty patients were included. Nine patients (7.50%) were seropositive on IHC, while 2 patients (1.67%) were positive on CBA (1 with concomitant IHC positivity, 1 without). In total, 10 patients (8.33%) were seropositive on IHC and/or CBA. Seropositivity was associated with female sex, autoimmune and psychiatric comorbidities, behavioral changes, speech problems, abnormal MRI brain, medial temporal T2/FLAIR hyperintensities, and ACES ≥2. AUC of ACES for seropositivity was 0.878; sensitivity and specificity were 60.0% and 96.4% respectively at a cutoff of ≥2.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>The frequency of specific, well-characterized anti-neural/neuronal antibodies in focal epilepsy of unknown etiology is low in Singapore. Distinct clinico-radiological features, in particular those that comprise the ACES score, were useful in identifying AES. Their presence should prompt antibody testing to confirm the diagnosis of AES for earlier immunotherapy.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>This study performed in Singapore investigated autoimmune epilepsy in people who have focal epilepsy with no clear cause. Researchers tested blood samples for antibodies linked to autoimmune epilepsy and compared clinical features between patients with and without these antibodies. Out of 120 patients, 10 had positive antibody tests-they were more often female, more likely to have autoimmune or psychiatric conditions, behavior or speech problems, and abnormal brain MRI findings. An ACES score of 2 or more was useful for identifying patients with antibodies. Using these clinical features can help clinicians decide who should be tested and treated earlier.</p>","PeriodicalId":12038,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia Open","volume":" ","pages":"1677-1691"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13452136/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/epi4.70327","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Autoimmune epilepsy (AES) is increasingly recognized as a condition in patients with epilepsy of unknown etiology. Early immunotherapy improves outcomes; however, data on its prevalence and the frequency of anti-neural/neuronal antibodies in Asian populations remain scarce. Herein, we aim to (1) evaluate the frequency of serum anti-neuronal/neural antibodies, (2) compare the clinical characteristics between seropositive and seronegative patients, and (3) explore the clinical utility of the ACES (Antibodies Contributing to Focal Epilepsy Signs and Symptoms) score in diagnosing AES in a cohort of Singaporean patients with focal epilepsy of unknown etiology.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional, observational, single-center study performed at the National Neuroscience Institute (NNI), Singapore. Patients with focal epilepsy of unknown etiology were prospectively recruited. Serum samples were tested using both cell-based (CBA) and immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based tissue assays. Patients were classified into definite, probable, and possible AES based on antibody positivity. Clinical characteristics, MRI and EEG findings, and ACES scores were analyzed.

Results: One-hundred-and-twenty patients were included. Nine patients (7.50%) were seropositive on IHC, while 2 patients (1.67%) were positive on CBA (1 with concomitant IHC positivity, 1 without). In total, 10 patients (8.33%) were seropositive on IHC and/or CBA. Seropositivity was associated with female sex, autoimmune and psychiatric comorbidities, behavioral changes, speech problems, abnormal MRI brain, medial temporal T2/FLAIR hyperintensities, and ACES ≥2. AUC of ACES for seropositivity was 0.878; sensitivity and specificity were 60.0% and 96.4% respectively at a cutoff of ≥2.

Significance: The frequency of specific, well-characterized anti-neural/neuronal antibodies in focal epilepsy of unknown etiology is low in Singapore. Distinct clinico-radiological features, in particular those that comprise the ACES score, were useful in identifying AES. Their presence should prompt antibody testing to confirm the diagnosis of AES for earlier immunotherapy.

Plain language summary: This study performed in Singapore investigated autoimmune epilepsy in people who have focal epilepsy with no clear cause. Researchers tested blood samples for antibodies linked to autoimmune epilepsy and compared clinical features between patients with and without these antibodies. Out of 120 patients, 10 had positive antibody tests-they were more often female, more likely to have autoimmune or psychiatric conditions, behavior or speech problems, and abnormal brain MRI findings. An ACES score of 2 or more was useful for identifying patients with antibodies. Using these clinical features can help clinicians decide who should be tested and treated earlier.

病因不明的局灶性癫痫中抗神经抗体和自身免疫性癫痫的频率:一项新加坡队列的观察性研究。
目的:自身免疫性癫痫(AES)越来越被认为是病因不明的癫痫患者的一种疾病。早期免疫治疗可改善预后;然而,关于亚洲人群中抗神经/神经元抗体的患病率和频率的数据仍然很少。在此,我们的目的是(1)评估血清抗神经元/神经抗体的频率,(2)比较血清阳性和血清阴性患者的临床特征,以及(3)探索ACES(促进局灶性癫痫体征和症状的抗体)评分在诊断病因不明的新加坡局灶性癫痫患者AES中的临床应用。方法:这是在新加坡国家神经科学研究所(NNI)进行的一项横断面、观察性、单中心研究。前瞻性招募病因不明的局灶性癫痫患者。血清样本采用基于细胞(CBA)和免疫组织化学(IHC)的组织检测。根据抗体阳性将患者分为确定、可能和可能的AES。分析两组患者的临床特点、MRI、EEG表现及ace评分。结果:纳入120例患者。9例(7.50%)血清免疫组化阳性,2例(1.67%)血清免疫组化阳性(1例合并免疫组化阳性,1例未合并免疫组化阳性)。共有10例(8.33%)患者血清免疫组化和/或CBA阳性。血清阳性与女性、自身免疫和精神合并症、行为改变、语言问题、MRI脑异常、内侧颞叶T2/FLAIR高信号和ace≥2相关。血清阳性的ace AUC为0.878;敏感度为60.0%,特异度为96.4%。意义:在新加坡,病因不明的局灶性癫痫中出现特异性、特征明确的抗神经/神经元抗体的频率较低。不同的临床放射学特征,特别是那些构成ace评分的特征,对识别AES是有用的。他们的存在应提示抗体检测,以确认早期免疫治疗的AES诊断。摘要:在新加坡进行的这项研究调查了病因不明的局灶性癫痫患者的自身免疫性癫痫。研究人员测试了血液样本中与自身免疫性癫痫相关的抗体,并比较了有和没有这些抗体的患者的临床特征。在120名患者中,有10人抗体检测呈阳性——她们通常是女性,更有可能有自身免疫或精神疾病、行为或语言问题,以及异常的脑MRI发现。ace得分在2分或2分以上对识别抗体患者是有用的。利用这些临床特征可以帮助临床医生决定谁应该及早接受检测和治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epilepsia Open
Epilepsia Open Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
104
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书