Early red blood cell transfusion burden, hemoglobin at first transfusion, and in-hospital mortality in patients supported with veno-arterial ECMO: a multicenter cohort study.

IF 6.9 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Annals of Intensive Care Pub Date : 2026-07-25 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.aicoj.2026.100125
Min Ho Ju, Seulgi Ju, In Seok Jeong, Hyoung Soo Kim, Yang Hyun Cho, Jae-Seung Jung, Jung-Hoon Shin, Sunghyun Sim, Hee Jung Kim
{"title":"Early red blood cell transfusion burden, hemoglobin at first transfusion, and in-hospital mortality in patients supported with veno-arterial ECMO: a multicenter cohort study.","authors":"Min Ho Ju, Seulgi Ju, In Seok Jeong, Hyoung Soo Kim, Yang Hyun Cho, Jae-Seung Jung, Jung-Hoon Shin, Sunghyun Sim, Hee Jung Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.aicoj.2026.100125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is common during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO), but the prognostic relevance of early cumulative transfusion burden and hemoglobin (Hb) at transfusion initiation remains uncertain. We examined associations of ECMO day-1 RBC dose and, among transfused patients, first-transfusion Hb and transfusion-pattern phenotype with in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults aged ≥18 years initiating peripheral VA-ECMO at six Korean centers between January 2018 and March 2025 were analyzed. The primary analysis used a 24 -h landmark cohort of patients alive and still receiving ECMO beyond 24 h. Day-1 RBC dose was categorized as 0, 1-2, 3-4, or ≥5 units and modeled per 2-unit increase. Adjusted risk ratios (RRs) were estimated using modified Poisson regression. Secondary analyses assessed first-transfusion Hb and consistent- versus variable threshold phenotypes among transfused complete cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 2,020 included patients, 1,708 entered the 24-h landmark cohort, and 1,140 complete cases comprised the adjusted primary analysis. Compared with no day-1 transfusion, adjusted RRs for in-hospital mortality were 1.20 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.40) for 1-2 units, 1.37 (95% CI, 1.17-1.59) for 3-4 units, and 1.48 (95% CI, 1.28-1.71) for ≥5 units. Each 2-unit increase was associated with higher mortality (adjusted RR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.05-1.11), with concordant findings over ECMO days 1-2 (adjusted RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.04-1.08). Among 1,043 transfused complete cases with qualifying pretransfusion Hb, each 1 g/dL decrease in first-transfusion Hb was associated with higher mortality (adjusted RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.10-1.20). The association was evident in the consistent-threshold phenotype (adjusted RR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.10-1.22) but not in the variable-threshold phenotype (adjusted RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.92-1.12).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In adults receiving peripheral VA-ECMO, early RBC transfusion burden showed a graded association with in-hospital mortality, whereas lower first-transfusion Hb was a prognostic marker chiefly within the consistent-threshold phenotype. These findings support dose- and threshold-aware prognostic assessment but do not establish causality or define an optimal transfusion threshold.</p>","PeriodicalId":7966,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Intensive Care","volume":"16 ","pages":"100125"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13452410/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aicoj.2026.100125","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is common during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO), but the prognostic relevance of early cumulative transfusion burden and hemoglobin (Hb) at transfusion initiation remains uncertain. We examined associations of ECMO day-1 RBC dose and, among transfused patients, first-transfusion Hb and transfusion-pattern phenotype with in-hospital mortality.

Methods: Adults aged ≥18 years initiating peripheral VA-ECMO at six Korean centers between January 2018 and March 2025 were analyzed. The primary analysis used a 24 -h landmark cohort of patients alive and still receiving ECMO beyond 24 h. Day-1 RBC dose was categorized as 0, 1-2, 3-4, or ≥5 units and modeled per 2-unit increase. Adjusted risk ratios (RRs) were estimated using modified Poisson regression. Secondary analyses assessed first-transfusion Hb and consistent- versus variable threshold phenotypes among transfused complete cases.

Results: Among 2,020 included patients, 1,708 entered the 24-h landmark cohort, and 1,140 complete cases comprised the adjusted primary analysis. Compared with no day-1 transfusion, adjusted RRs for in-hospital mortality were 1.20 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.40) for 1-2 units, 1.37 (95% CI, 1.17-1.59) for 3-4 units, and 1.48 (95% CI, 1.28-1.71) for ≥5 units. Each 2-unit increase was associated with higher mortality (adjusted RR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.05-1.11), with concordant findings over ECMO days 1-2 (adjusted RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.04-1.08). Among 1,043 transfused complete cases with qualifying pretransfusion Hb, each 1 g/dL decrease in first-transfusion Hb was associated with higher mortality (adjusted RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.10-1.20). The association was evident in the consistent-threshold phenotype (adjusted RR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.10-1.22) but not in the variable-threshold phenotype (adjusted RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.92-1.12).

Conclusions: In adults receiving peripheral VA-ECMO, early RBC transfusion burden showed a graded association with in-hospital mortality, whereas lower first-transfusion Hb was a prognostic marker chiefly within the consistent-threshold phenotype. These findings support dose- and threshold-aware prognostic assessment but do not establish causality or define an optimal transfusion threshold.

静脉-动脉ECMO支持患者的早期红细胞输血负担、首次输血时血红蛋白和住院死亡率:一项多中心队列研究
背景:在静脉动脉体外膜氧合(VA-ECMO)中,红细胞(RBC)输血是常见的,但输血开始时早期累积输血负担和血红蛋白(Hb)的预后相关性仍不确定。我们检查了ECMO第1天红细胞剂量,输血患者中首次输血Hb和输血模式表型与住院死亡率的关系。方法:对2018年1月至2025年3月在韩国6个中心启动外周VA-ECMO的年龄≥18岁的成年人进行分析。主要分析采用存活24小时的里程碑队列,24小时后仍在接受ECMO。第1天RBC剂量分为0、1-2、3-4或≥5个单位,每增加2个单位建立模型。校正风险比(rr)采用修正泊松回归估计。二级分析评估了输血完全病例中首次输血Hb和一致与可变阈值表型。结果:在纳入的2020例患者中,1708例进入了24小时里程碑队列,1140例完整病例纳入了调整后的初步分析。与不输血第1天相比,1-2单位的住院死亡率调整后危险度为1.20(95%可信区间[CI], 1.02-1.40), 3-4单位的调整后危险度为1.37 (95% CI, 1.17-1.59),≥5单位的调整后危险度为1.48 (95% CI, 1.28-1.71)。每增加2个单位与较高的死亡率相关(校正后的RR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.05-1.11),在ECMO第1-2天的结果也一致(校正后的RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.04-1.08)。在1043例输血前Hb符合条件的完整病例中,首次输血Hb每降低1 g/dL与较高的死亡率相关(校正RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.10-1.20)。这种关联在一致阈值表型中很明显(校正RR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.10-1.22),但在可变阈值表型中不明显(校正RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.92-1.12)。结论:在接受外周VA-ECMO的成人中,早期红细胞输血负担与住院死亡率呈分级相关,而较低的首次输血Hb主要是一致阈值表型内的预后标志物。这些发现支持剂量和阈值感知的预后评估,但没有建立因果关系或定义最佳输血阈值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Intensive Care
Annals of Intensive Care CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Intensive Care is an online peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality review articles and original research papers in the field of intensive care medicine. It targets critical care providers including attending physicians, fellows, residents, nurses, and physiotherapists, who aim to enhance their knowledge and provide optimal care for their patients. The journal's articles are included in various prestigious databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, OCLC, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded, SCOPUS, and Summon by Serial Solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书