Prevalence and prognosis impact of right ventricular injury in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 6.9 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Annals of Intensive Care Pub Date : 2026-07-16 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.aicoj.2026.100117
Mathieu Jozwiak, Adrien Joseph, Alan Mourougayen, Matthieu Petit, Antoine Vieillard-Baron, Philippe Vignon, Bruno Evrard
{"title":"Prevalence and prognosis impact of right ventricular injury in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Mathieu Jozwiak, Adrien Joseph, Alan Mourougayen, Matthieu Petit, Antoine Vieillard-Baron, Philippe Vignon, Bruno Evrard","doi":"10.1016/j.aicoj.2026.100117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Right ventricular (RV) injury is a frequent complication in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), yet its prevalence and prognostic significance remain uncertain. The main objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the association between RV injury and mortality in patients with ARDS. The secondary objectives were to determine the prevalence of RV injury and to assess the impact of both COVID-19 status and the definition of RV injury on mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2013 to December 2024, we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for all studies including adult patients with ARDS according to the Berlin definition, which reported mortality according to the presence or absence of RV injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three studies including 3,977 patients with ARDS were analyzed. The pooled prevalence of RV injury was 30% (95% confidence intervals (CI) 23-38%), ranging from 6% to 56% across studies depending on the definition used, and did not differ between COVID-19 (33%, 95%CI 22-47%) and non-COVID-19 (25%, 95%CI 21-29 %) patients. RV injury was associated with increased ICU mortality in unadjusted analyses (random-effects odds ratio (OR) 2.49, 95%CI 1.81-3.42; I<sup>2</sup> = 56%) and in adjusted analyses (aOR 2.37, 95%CI 1.24-4.51, I<sup>2</sup> = 42%; adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 2.64, 95%CI 1.60-4.37, I<sup>2</sup> = 24%). This association remained consistent across subgroups based on COVID-19 status and RV injury definition, and across sensitivity analyses excluding patients receiving venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and low to moderate quality studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RV injury is common in patients with ARDS and is consistently associated with increased mortality, irrespective of the definition used. Further studies enrolling consecutive patients, with standardized and repeated echocardiographic assessment of RV function, are needed to establish causal inference.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>CRD42024568063 and date of registration: 22/07/2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":7966,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Intensive Care","volume":"16 ","pages":"100117"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13452399/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aicoj.2026.100117","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Right ventricular (RV) injury is a frequent complication in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), yet its prevalence and prognostic significance remain uncertain. The main objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the association between RV injury and mortality in patients with ARDS. The secondary objectives were to determine the prevalence of RV injury and to assess the impact of both COVID-19 status and the definition of RV injury on mortality.

Methods: From January 2013 to December 2024, we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for all studies including adult patients with ARDS according to the Berlin definition, which reported mortality according to the presence or absence of RV injury.

Results: Twenty-three studies including 3,977 patients with ARDS were analyzed. The pooled prevalence of RV injury was 30% (95% confidence intervals (CI) 23-38%), ranging from 6% to 56% across studies depending on the definition used, and did not differ between COVID-19 (33%, 95%CI 22-47%) and non-COVID-19 (25%, 95%CI 21-29 %) patients. RV injury was associated with increased ICU mortality in unadjusted analyses (random-effects odds ratio (OR) 2.49, 95%CI 1.81-3.42; I2 = 56%) and in adjusted analyses (aOR 2.37, 95%CI 1.24-4.51, I2 = 42%; adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 2.64, 95%CI 1.60-4.37, I2 = 24%). This association remained consistent across subgroups based on COVID-19 status and RV injury definition, and across sensitivity analyses excluding patients receiving venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and low to moderate quality studies.

Conclusions: RV injury is common in patients with ARDS and is consistently associated with increased mortality, irrespective of the definition used. Further studies enrolling consecutive patients, with standardized and repeated echocardiographic assessment of RV function, are needed to establish causal inference.

Trial registration: CRD42024568063 and date of registration: 22/07/2024.

急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者右心室损伤的患病率和预后影响:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:右心室(RV)损伤是急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者的常见并发症,但其患病率和预后意义尚不清楚。本系统综述和荟萃分析的主要目的是评估ARDS患者右心室损伤与死亡率之间的关系。次要目标是确定RV损伤的患病率,并评估COVID-19状态和RV损伤定义对死亡率的影响。方法:从2013年1月至2024年12月,我们检索MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane中央对照试验注册库,检索所有研究,包括根据柏林定义的成年ARDS患者,这些研究根据RV损伤的存在或不存在报告死亡率。结果:共分析了23项研究,包括3977例ARDS患者。RV损伤的总发生率为30%(95%置信区间(CI) 23-38%),根据所使用的定义,不同研究的发生率从6%到56%不等,并且在COVID-19 (33%, 95%CI 22-47%)和非COVID-19 (25%, 95%CI 21- 29%)患者之间没有差异。未经校正分析的右心室损伤与ICU死亡率增加相关(随机效应优势比(OR) 2.49, 95%CI 1.81-3.42;I2 = 56%)和校正分析(aOR 2.37, 95%CI 1.24-4.51, I2 = 42%;校正风险比(aHR) 2.64, 95%CI 1.60-4.37, I2 = 24%)。基于COVID-19状态和RV损伤定义,以及排除接受静脉-静脉体外膜氧合的患者和低至中等质量研究的敏感性分析,这种关联在亚组中保持一致。结论:右心室损伤在急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者中很常见,无论使用何种定义,均与死亡率增加相关。需要进一步的研究,纳入连续的患者,对右室功能进行标准化和重复的超声心动图评估,以建立因果推理。试验注册号:CRD42024568063,注册日期:22/07/2024。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Intensive Care
Annals of Intensive Care CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Intensive Care is an online peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality review articles and original research papers in the field of intensive care medicine. It targets critical care providers including attending physicians, fellows, residents, nurses, and physiotherapists, who aim to enhance their knowledge and provide optimal care for their patients. The journal's articles are included in various prestigious databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, OCLC, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded, SCOPUS, and Summon by Serial Solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书