The gender pain gap in prehospital analgesia: the role of patient and provider gender - an analysis of 106,888 helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) missions.
Andrea Schmidt, Hans-Jörg Busch, Lilith Huebsch, Florian Reifferscheid, Jörg Braun, Sebastian Heinrich, Julian Ganter
{"title":"The gender pain gap in prehospital analgesia: the role of patient and provider gender - an analysis of 106,888 helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) missions.","authors":"Andrea Schmidt, Hans-Jörg Busch, Lilith Huebsch, Florian Reifferscheid, Jörg Braun, Sebastian Heinrich, Julian Ganter","doi":"10.1186/s12916-026-05131-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain management is a core ethical principle in emergency medicine, yet gender-related differences in analgesic treatment have been reported. This study examines whether patient and emergency physician gender influence prehospital pain management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational cohort study included all primary helicopter emergency medical service missions conducted by DRF Stiftung Luftrettung in Germany between January 2012 and June 2025. Adult patients (≥ 18 years) with a Glasgow Coma Scale score ≥ 11 and without airway management were analyzed. Pain severity was assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Patient characteristics, analgesic treatment, and emergency physician gender were analyzed using descriptive statistical methods. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee Freiburg (25-1272-S1, August 19th 2025).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 106,888 cases was included, of which 38.5% were female and 61.5% male. Initial pain severity was comparable between genders, with a similar distribution across NRS categories. Despite this, women received analgesic treatment less frequently than men (62.0% vs. 66.9%; p < 0.001), whereas a greater effect is seen when particularly examining the use of opioid analgesics (50.0% vs. 57.1%; p < 0.001). This finding is consistent across all pain severity subgroups. Pain scores at patient handover were similar for women and men, indicating comparable pain levels at the end of prehospital care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite comparable pain intensity, women received analgesic and opioid treatment less frequently than men in prehospital care, indicating potential gender-based inequalities in pain management. These findings underscore the need for strategies to ensure equitable analgesic treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13453089/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-026-05131-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Pain management is a core ethical principle in emergency medicine, yet gender-related differences in analgesic treatment have been reported. This study examines whether patient and emergency physician gender influence prehospital pain management.
Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study included all primary helicopter emergency medical service missions conducted by DRF Stiftung Luftrettung in Germany between January 2012 and June 2025. Adult patients (≥ 18 years) with a Glasgow Coma Scale score ≥ 11 and without airway management were analyzed. Pain severity was assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Patient characteristics, analgesic treatment, and emergency physician gender were analyzed using descriptive statistical methods. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee Freiburg (25-1272-S1, August 19th 2025).
Results: A total of 106,888 cases was included, of which 38.5% were female and 61.5% male. Initial pain severity was comparable between genders, with a similar distribution across NRS categories. Despite this, women received analgesic treatment less frequently than men (62.0% vs. 66.9%; p < 0.001), whereas a greater effect is seen when particularly examining the use of opioid analgesics (50.0% vs. 57.1%; p < 0.001). This finding is consistent across all pain severity subgroups. Pain scores at patient handover were similar for women and men, indicating comparable pain levels at the end of prehospital care.
Conclusions: Despite comparable pain intensity, women received analgesic and opioid treatment less frequently than men in prehospital care, indicating potential gender-based inequalities in pain management. These findings underscore the need for strategies to ensure equitable analgesic treatment.
背景:疼痛管理是急诊医学的核心伦理原则,但在镇痛治疗方面存在性别差异。本研究探讨患者和急诊医师性别是否影响院前疼痛管理。方法:本回顾性观察队列研究包括2012年1月至2025年6月期间德国DRF基金会在德国进行的所有主要直升机紧急医疗服务任务。成人患者(≥18岁),格拉斯哥昏迷评分≥11分,没有气道管理进行分析。使用数字评定量表(NRS)评估疼痛严重程度。采用描述性统计方法对患者特征、镇痛治疗和急诊医师性别进行分析。该研究已获得Freiburg伦理委员会批准(25-1272-S1, 2025年8月19日)。结果:共纳入106888例,其中女性38.5%,男性61.5%。初始疼痛严重程度在性别之间具有可比性,在NRS分类中具有相似的分布。尽管如此,女性接受镇痛治疗的频率低于男性(62.0% vs. 66.9%); p结论:尽管疼痛强度相当,但在院前护理中,女性接受镇痛和阿片类药物治疗的频率低于男性,这表明在疼痛管理中可能存在基于性别的不平等。这些发现强调需要制定策略以确保公平的镇痛治疗。
期刊介绍:
BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.