Targeted Trade Policy Instruments and Climate Change Mitigation: The Case of Environmental Provisions in Trade Agreements

IF 2.4 3区 经济学 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Petros Suzgo Kayovo Mkandawire, Dela-Dem Doe Fiankor, Bernhard Brümmer
{"title":"Targeted Trade Policy Instruments and Climate Change Mitigation: The Case of Environmental Provisions in Trade Agreements","authors":"Petros Suzgo Kayovo Mkandawire,&nbsp;Dela-Dem Doe Fiankor,&nbsp;Bernhard Brümmer","doi":"10.1111/1467-8489.70057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article examines the effect of including environmental provisions (EPs) in preferential trade agreements (PTAs) on climate change mitigation and explores whether these effects vary based on the heterogeneity of the EPs. Our analysis combines country-level data on climate change mitigation with details on 300 types of EPs in 775 trade agreements. Empirically, we estimate a generalised method of moments regression and address potential endogeneity using instrumental variables. Our results show that the inclusion of EPs in PTAs significantly improves climate change mitigation, regardless of whether we measure performance using the Climate Change Performance Index, the Environmental Performance Index or CO<sub>2</sub> emissions data. The effectiveness of these provisions, however, depends on their diversity. Key benefits include reduced greenhouse gas emissions, increased renewable energy use, improved energy efficiency and enhanced climate policies. More importantly, PTAs with direct climate provisions yield greater improvements in climate change mitigation outcomes compared to those addressing environmental issues more generally or indirectly. Finally, we show that PTAs with climate change provisions are an effective tool for climate change mitigation, regardless of the development status of the signatories. However, the effects are more pronounced for North–South PTAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":55427,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics","volume":"70 3","pages":"642-660"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8489.70057","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8489.70057","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the effect of including environmental provisions (EPs) in preferential trade agreements (PTAs) on climate change mitigation and explores whether these effects vary based on the heterogeneity of the EPs. Our analysis combines country-level data on climate change mitigation with details on 300 types of EPs in 775 trade agreements. Empirically, we estimate a generalised method of moments regression and address potential endogeneity using instrumental variables. Our results show that the inclusion of EPs in PTAs significantly improves climate change mitigation, regardless of whether we measure performance using the Climate Change Performance Index, the Environmental Performance Index or CO2 emissions data. The effectiveness of these provisions, however, depends on their diversity. Key benefits include reduced greenhouse gas emissions, increased renewable energy use, improved energy efficiency and enhanced climate policies. More importantly, PTAs with direct climate provisions yield greater improvements in climate change mitigation outcomes compared to those addressing environmental issues more generally or indirectly. Finally, we show that PTAs with climate change provisions are an effective tool for climate change mitigation, regardless of the development status of the signatories. However, the effects are more pronounced for North–South PTAs.

有针对性的贸易政策工具和减缓气候变化:以贸易协定中的环境条款为例
本文考察了在优惠贸易协定中纳入环境条款对减缓气候变化的影响,并探讨了这些影响是否因优惠贸易协定的异质性而有所不同。我们的分析结合了国家层面的气候变化减缓数据,以及775个贸易协定中300种ep的详细信息。在经验上,我们估计了矩回归的广义方法,并使用工具变量解决潜在的内生性。我们的研究结果表明,无论我们是使用气候变化绩效指数、环境绩效指数还是二氧化碳排放数据来衡量绩效,将EPs纳入pta都显著提高了气候变化减缓效果。然而,这些规定的效力取决于它们的多样性。主要效益包括减少温室气体排放、增加可再生能源使用、提高能源效率和加强气候政策。更重要的是,与更一般或间接处理环境问题的协定相比,具有直接气候条款的协定在缓解气候变化成果方面取得了更大的进展。最后,我们表明,无论签署国的发展状况如何,带有气候变化条款的自由贸易区都是减缓气候变化的有效工具。然而,南北自由贸易区的影响更为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics (AJARE) provides a forum for innovative and scholarly work in agricultural and resource economics. First published in 1997, the Journal succeeds the Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics and the Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, upholding the tradition of these long-established journals. Accordingly, the editors are guided by the following objectives: -To maintain a high standard of analytical rigour offering sufficient variety of content so as to appeal to a broad spectrum of both academic and professional economists and policymakers. -In maintaining the tradition of its predecessor journals, to combine articles with policy reviews and surveys of key analytical issues in agricultural and resource economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书