Combining Sampling Methods, Cost-Sensitive Learning, and Ensemble Techniques for Highly Class-Imbalanced Financial Distress Prediction

IF 2.6 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Journal of Forecasting Pub Date : 2026-08-05 Epub Date: 2026-04-27 DOI:10.1002/for.70162
Wei-Qiang Huang, Lianlian Wang
{"title":"Combining Sampling Methods, Cost-Sensitive Learning, and Ensemble Techniques for Highly Class-Imbalanced Financial Distress Prediction","authors":"Wei-Qiang Huang,&nbsp;Lianlian Wang","doi":"10.1002/for.70162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In highly class-imbalanced financial distress prediction, standard classifiers often fail as they assume balanced class distributions and equal misclassification costs. We propose a heterogeneous voting ensemble method that addresses extreme class imbalance by synergizing sampling, cost-sensitive learning, and ensemble techniques. First, coordinating sampling and cost-sensitive learning reduces model bias in identifying distressed firms. Sampling rebalances class distributions, which reduces representation bias and provides an effective data foundation for cost-sensitive learning. Cost-sensitive learning assigns higher costs to distressed firms, adjusting the optimization objective to minimize total misclassification costs. Second, by aggregating diverse base classifiers, the heterogeneous voting ensemble reduces potential additional variance introduced by sampling and cost-sensitive learning, thereby improving generalization. Using data from China, Poland, and the United States, we show that the proposed method significantly outperforms benchmark models in detecting distressed firms. Moreover, the improved predictions translate into reduced misclassification costs, particularly when the cost difference between distressed and healthy firms is greater. Ablation experiments validate the effectiveness of each component, where sampling contributes most to detection accuracy for distressed firms, followed by cost-sensitive learning, while the ensemble ensures model stability. These results highlight that combining sampling, cost-sensitive learning, and ensemble techniques is crucial for stakeholders (e.g., investors, creditors, and regulators) to detect rare events such as financial distress.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47835,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forecasting","volume":"45 6","pages":"2861-2889"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forecasting","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/for.70162","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In highly class-imbalanced financial distress prediction, standard classifiers often fail as they assume balanced class distributions and equal misclassification costs. We propose a heterogeneous voting ensemble method that addresses extreme class imbalance by synergizing sampling, cost-sensitive learning, and ensemble techniques. First, coordinating sampling and cost-sensitive learning reduces model bias in identifying distressed firms. Sampling rebalances class distributions, which reduces representation bias and provides an effective data foundation for cost-sensitive learning. Cost-sensitive learning assigns higher costs to distressed firms, adjusting the optimization objective to minimize total misclassification costs. Second, by aggregating diverse base classifiers, the heterogeneous voting ensemble reduces potential additional variance introduced by sampling and cost-sensitive learning, thereby improving generalization. Using data from China, Poland, and the United States, we show that the proposed method significantly outperforms benchmark models in detecting distressed firms. Moreover, the improved predictions translate into reduced misclassification costs, particularly when the cost difference between distressed and healthy firms is greater. Ablation experiments validate the effectiveness of each component, where sampling contributes most to detection accuracy for distressed firms, followed by cost-sensitive learning, while the ensemble ensures model stability. These results highlight that combining sampling, cost-sensitive learning, and ensemble techniques is crucial for stakeholders (e.g., investors, creditors, and regulators) to detect rare events such as financial distress.

结合抽样方法、成本敏感学习和集成技术进行高度类别不平衡的财务困境预测
在高度类别不平衡的财务困境预测中,标准分类器往往失败,因为它们假设平衡的类别分布和相等的错误分类成本。我们提出了一种异构投票集成方法,通过协同采样、成本敏感学习和集成技术来解决极端的阶级不平衡问题。首先,协调抽样和成本敏感学习减少了识别陷入困境企业的模型偏差。采样重新平衡了类分布,减少了表征偏差,为成本敏感学习提供了有效的数据基础。成本敏感学习为陷入困境的企业分配更高的成本,调整优化目标以最小化总错误分类成本。其次,通过聚合不同的基分类器,异构投票集成减少了采样和代价敏感学习带来的潜在额外方差,从而提高了泛化能力。使用来自中国、波兰和美国的数据,我们表明所提出的方法在检测陷入困境的公司方面明显优于基准模型。此外,改进的预测转化为减少错误分类成本,特别是当陷入困境的公司和健康的公司之间的成本差异更大时。消融实验验证了每个组件的有效性,其中采样对陷入困境的公司的检测准确性贡献最大,其次是成本敏感学习,而集成确保了模型的稳定性。这些结果强调,结合抽样、成本敏感学习和集成技术对于利益相关者(如投资者、债权人和监管机构)检测罕见事件(如财务困境)至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: The Journal of Forecasting is an international journal that publishes refereed papers on forecasting. It is multidisciplinary, welcoming papers dealing with any aspect of forecasting: theoretical, practical, computational and methodological. A broad interpretation of the topic is taken with approaches from various subject areas, such as statistics, economics, psychology, systems engineering and social sciences, all encouraged. Furthermore, the Journal welcomes a wide diversity of applications in such fields as business, government, technology and the environment. Of particular interest are papers dealing with modelling issues and the relationship of forecasting systems to decision-making processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书