Embodied, Enacted, and Multimodal: Exploring Science Teachers’ Metaphors in Authentic Classroom Contexts

IF 4 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Science & Education Pub Date : 2026-08-07 Epub Date: 2026-04-23 DOI:10.1002/sce.70077
Magdalena Kersting, Priscila Kohler, Marianne Ødegaard
{"title":"Embodied, Enacted, and Multimodal: Exploring Science Teachers’ Metaphors in Authentic Classroom Contexts","authors":"Magdalena Kersting,&nbsp;Priscila Kohler,&nbsp;Marianne Ødegaard","doi":"10.1002/sce.70077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Over the past decades, science education research has extensively examined the role of metaphors in teaching and learning science. However, much of the existing research has focused on verbal manifestations of metaphors, thereby overlooking aspects of metaphors that may occur in non-verbal form. This study reconceptualises metaphors as dynamic performances rather than mere verbal expressions by integrating perspectives from embodied cognition, enactivism, and the social semiotic theory of multimodality. We conducted a systematic metaphor analysis coupled with a multimodal interaction analysis of video data collected from five science teachers over 16 science lessons in five lower-secondary schools in Norway. Our findings show that the teachers routinely employed metaphors when introducing abstract concepts and explaining complex processes. These metaphors were often expressed multimodally through speech, gesture, and material objects. We identified five distinct patterns in teachers' metaphorical performances: (1) layering and integration of multiple modes to create rich metaphorical ensembles; (2) using gestures to scale scientific phenomena to human experience; (3) enacting dynamic processes through embodied modes; (4) maintaining metaphoricity through modal anchors; and (5) orchestrating progression from embodied representations to abstract scientific concepts. Additionally, we identified specific functions that different modes serve in the enactment and communication of metaphorical meaning, extending our understanding of multimodal meaning-making in science education. These findings demonstrate that metaphors function both as figures of thought and figures of action in science classrooms. Finally, the patterns shed light on teachers' tacit expertise in multimodal metaphorical communication and offer a framework for fostering reflective awareness in teacher education.</p>","PeriodicalId":771,"journal":{"name":"Science & Education","volume":"110 5","pages":"1469-1496"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/sce.70077","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sce.70077","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past decades, science education research has extensively examined the role of metaphors in teaching and learning science. However, much of the existing research has focused on verbal manifestations of metaphors, thereby overlooking aspects of metaphors that may occur in non-verbal form. This study reconceptualises metaphors as dynamic performances rather than mere verbal expressions by integrating perspectives from embodied cognition, enactivism, and the social semiotic theory of multimodality. We conducted a systematic metaphor analysis coupled with a multimodal interaction analysis of video data collected from five science teachers over 16 science lessons in five lower-secondary schools in Norway. Our findings show that the teachers routinely employed metaphors when introducing abstract concepts and explaining complex processes. These metaphors were often expressed multimodally through speech, gesture, and material objects. We identified five distinct patterns in teachers' metaphorical performances: (1) layering and integration of multiple modes to create rich metaphorical ensembles; (2) using gestures to scale scientific phenomena to human experience; (3) enacting dynamic processes through embodied modes; (4) maintaining metaphoricity through modal anchors; and (5) orchestrating progression from embodied representations to abstract scientific concepts. Additionally, we identified specific functions that different modes serve in the enactment and communication of metaphorical meaning, extending our understanding of multimodal meaning-making in science education. These findings demonstrate that metaphors function both as figures of thought and figures of action in science classrooms. Finally, the patterns shed light on teachers' tacit expertise in multimodal metaphorical communication and offer a framework for fostering reflective awareness in teacher education.

体现、制定与多模态:探索真实课堂情境中科学教师的隐喻
在过去的几十年里,科学教育研究广泛地考察了隐喻在科学教学中的作用。然而,现有的研究大多集中在隐喻的语言表现上,从而忽略了隐喻在非语言形式下可能出现的方面。本研究通过整合具身认知、行动主义和多模态社会符号学理论的观点,将隐喻重新定义为动态表演,而不仅仅是言语表达。我们对挪威五所初中的五名科学教师在16节科学课上收集的视频数据进行了系统的隐喻分析和多模态交互分析。我们的研究结果表明,教师在介绍抽象概念和解释复杂过程时经常使用隐喻。这些隐喻通常通过言语、手势和实物以多种方式表达。我们发现了教师隐喻表演的五种不同模式:(1)多种模式的分层和整合,创造丰富的隐喻合奏;(2)用手势将科学现象转化为人类经验;(3)通过具身模式制定动态过程;(4)通过情态锚点维持隐喻性;(5)协调从具身表征到抽象科学概念的进展。此外,我们还确定了不同模式在隐喻意义的制定和传播中的具体功能,扩展了我们对科学教育中多模态意义形成的理解。这些研究结果表明,隐喻在科学课堂中既是思想形象又是行动形象。最后,这些模式揭示了教师在多模态隐喻交际中的隐性专业知识,并为教师教育中培养反思意识提供了一个框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science & Education
Science & Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
14.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Science Education publishes original articles on the latest issues and trends occurring internationally in science curriculum, instruction, learning, policy and preparation of science teachers with the aim to advance our knowledge of science education theory and practice. In addition to original articles, the journal features the following special sections: -Learning : consisting of theoretical and empirical research studies on learning of science. We invite manuscripts that investigate learning and its change and growth from various lenses, including psychological, social, cognitive, sociohistorical, and affective. Studies examining the relationship of learning to teaching, the science knowledge and practices, the learners themselves, and the contexts (social, political, physical, ideological, institutional, epistemological, and cultural) are similarly welcome. -Issues and Trends : consisting primarily of analytical, interpretive, or persuasive essays on current educational, social, or philosophical issues and trends relevant to the teaching of science. This special section particularly seeks to promote informed dialogues about current issues in science education, and carefully reasoned papers representing disparate viewpoints are welcomed. Manuscripts submitted for this section may be in the form of a position paper, a polemical piece, or a creative commentary. -Science Learning in Everyday Life : consisting of analytical, interpretative, or philosophical papers regarding learning science outside of the formal classroom. Papers should investigate experiences in settings such as community, home, the Internet, after school settings, museums, and other opportunities that develop science interest, knowledge or practices across the life span. Attention to issues and factors relating to equity in science learning are especially encouraged.. -Science Teacher Education [...]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书