“Taking Off the Rose-Colored Glasses”: How Justice-Centered Science Curricula Engages Prehealth Undergraduates' in Critical Consciousness

IF 4 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Science & Education Pub Date : 2026-08-07 Epub Date: 2026-04-24 DOI:10.1002/sce.70074
Sabah K. Elias, Francisca Dogbe, Ashley R. Acosta-Parra, Arsema Alemayehu, Faizah Asif, Yajing Feng, Jacob Francisco Gomez, Isabella Morimoto, Ofelia Preciado, Dathan Tran, Ross Wohlgemuth, Lucas R. Smith, Eric J. Crossen, Brie Tripp
{"title":"“Taking Off the Rose-Colored Glasses”: How Justice-Centered Science Curricula Engages Prehealth Undergraduates' in Critical Consciousness","authors":"Sabah K. Elias,&nbsp;Francisca Dogbe,&nbsp;Ashley R. Acosta-Parra,&nbsp;Arsema Alemayehu,&nbsp;Faizah Asif,&nbsp;Yajing Feng,&nbsp;Jacob Francisco Gomez,&nbsp;Isabella Morimoto,&nbsp;Ofelia Preciado,&nbsp;Dathan Tran,&nbsp;Ross Wohlgemuth,&nbsp;Lucas R. Smith,&nbsp;Eric J. Crossen,&nbsp;Brie Tripp","doi":"10.1002/sce.70074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Health disparities rooted in systemic oppression and perpetuated by implicit bias among medical professionals remain pervasive across North America. These inequities are often sustained by providers' limited awareness of social realities that shape the lives of people from marginalized communities. Raising future healthcare practitioners' critical consciousness—the ability to recognize oppressive structures that cause disparities (critical reflection), feeling motivated to challenge them (critical self-efficacy), and taking action to change these circumstances (critical action)—holds promise in addressing healthcare injustice. In this study, undergraduate researchers with lived experience of systemic oppression developed case studies with input from local community partners. These cases were implemented in an upper-division human physiology course that challenged pre-health students to analyze the intersection of physiology, health disparities, and advocacy. Through interviews, findings revealed that students were encouraged to critically reflect and felt confident to act against injustice along a critical consciousness continuum, with the majority describing structural oppression as the root cause of health disparities and motivation to change these circumstances. This attests to the power of justice-centered curricula to foster a more just future in medicine and the potential to cultivate more critically conscious healthcare practitioners.</p>","PeriodicalId":771,"journal":{"name":"Science & Education","volume":"110 5","pages":"1405-1423"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/sce.70074","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sce.70074","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Health disparities rooted in systemic oppression and perpetuated by implicit bias among medical professionals remain pervasive across North America. These inequities are often sustained by providers' limited awareness of social realities that shape the lives of people from marginalized communities. Raising future healthcare practitioners' critical consciousness—the ability to recognize oppressive structures that cause disparities (critical reflection), feeling motivated to challenge them (critical self-efficacy), and taking action to change these circumstances (critical action)—holds promise in addressing healthcare injustice. In this study, undergraduate researchers with lived experience of systemic oppression developed case studies with input from local community partners. These cases were implemented in an upper-division human physiology course that challenged pre-health students to analyze the intersection of physiology, health disparities, and advocacy. Through interviews, findings revealed that students were encouraged to critically reflect and felt confident to act against injustice along a critical consciousness continuum, with the majority describing structural oppression as the root cause of health disparities and motivation to change these circumstances. This attests to the power of justice-centered curricula to foster a more just future in medicine and the potential to cultivate more critically conscious healthcare practitioners.

“摘掉玫瑰色的眼镜”:以正义为中心的科学课程如何培养学前大学生的批判意识
健康差距源于系统性压迫和医疗专业人员的隐性偏见,在北美各地仍然普遍存在。这些不公平现象往往是由于提供者对影响边缘化社区人民生活的社会现实认识有限造成的。提高未来医疗从业者的批判意识——识别造成差异的压迫结构的能力(批判性反思),有动力挑战它们(批判性自我效能),并采取行动改变这些情况(批判性行动)——有望解决医疗不公正问题。在本研究中,具有系统性压迫生活经验的本科生研究人员根据当地社区合作伙伴的意见进行了案例研究。这些案例是在高年级的人体生理学课程中实施的,该课程要求健康预科学生分析生理学、健康差异和倡导的交集。通过访谈,调查结果显示,鼓励学生批判性地反思,并有信心沿着批判意识连续体对不公正采取行动,大多数人将结构性压迫描述为健康差距的根本原因和改变这些情况的动机。这证明了以正义为中心的课程在促进医学更公正的未来方面的力量,以及培养更多具有批判性意识的医疗从业人员的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science & Education
Science & Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
14.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Science Education publishes original articles on the latest issues and trends occurring internationally in science curriculum, instruction, learning, policy and preparation of science teachers with the aim to advance our knowledge of science education theory and practice. In addition to original articles, the journal features the following special sections: -Learning : consisting of theoretical and empirical research studies on learning of science. We invite manuscripts that investigate learning and its change and growth from various lenses, including psychological, social, cognitive, sociohistorical, and affective. Studies examining the relationship of learning to teaching, the science knowledge and practices, the learners themselves, and the contexts (social, political, physical, ideological, institutional, epistemological, and cultural) are similarly welcome. -Issues and Trends : consisting primarily of analytical, interpretive, or persuasive essays on current educational, social, or philosophical issues and trends relevant to the teaching of science. This special section particularly seeks to promote informed dialogues about current issues in science education, and carefully reasoned papers representing disparate viewpoints are welcomed. Manuscripts submitted for this section may be in the form of a position paper, a polemical piece, or a creative commentary. -Science Learning in Everyday Life : consisting of analytical, interpretative, or philosophical papers regarding learning science outside of the formal classroom. Papers should investigate experiences in settings such as community, home, the Internet, after school settings, museums, and other opportunities that develop science interest, knowledge or practices across the life span. Attention to issues and factors relating to equity in science learning are especially encouraged.. -Science Teacher Education [...]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书