The Price Gap in Agriculture-Based Greenhouse Gas Offset Markets

IF 2.4 3区 经济学 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Jingyi W. Liu, Bruce A. McCarl, Chengcheng J. Fei
{"title":"The Price Gap in Agriculture-Based Greenhouse Gas Offset Markets","authors":"Jingyi W. Liu,&nbsp;Bruce A. McCarl,&nbsp;Chengcheng J. Fei","doi":"10.1111/1467-8489.70052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Today, there is a global effort to reduce greenhouse gas net emissions (GHGNE). For economic well-being, it is important to identify low-cost means of net emission offsets. Agriculture and forestry have received considerable attention as a means of supplying emissions offsets, as they contribute nearly 20% of global emissions. However, given that other sources of emissions also present opportunities for reducing GHGNE, the issue of comparative offset costs becomes important. This paper examines the offset costs associated with reducing net carbon dioxide equivalent emissions in agriculture and highlights the relative costs and associated cost components. We discuss an approach for estimating the per-tonne GHGNE cost and formulate expressions for the cost to buyers, payments to sellers, and the gap in between in the context of a potential carbon market. Case studies are conducted to estimate the gap for different situations. We believe differences in claimable versus saleable GHGNE quantities and market transaction costs, in part, explain the large variation in observed prices paid for different emission offset actions.</p>","PeriodicalId":55427,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics","volume":"70 3","pages":"610-624"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8489.70052","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8489.70052","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Today, there is a global effort to reduce greenhouse gas net emissions (GHGNE). For economic well-being, it is important to identify low-cost means of net emission offsets. Agriculture and forestry have received considerable attention as a means of supplying emissions offsets, as they contribute nearly 20% of global emissions. However, given that other sources of emissions also present opportunities for reducing GHGNE, the issue of comparative offset costs becomes important. This paper examines the offset costs associated with reducing net carbon dioxide equivalent emissions in agriculture and highlights the relative costs and associated cost components. We discuss an approach for estimating the per-tonne GHGNE cost and formulate expressions for the cost to buyers, payments to sellers, and the gap in between in the context of a potential carbon market. Case studies are conducted to estimate the gap for different situations. We believe differences in claimable versus saleable GHGNE quantities and market transaction costs, in part, explain the large variation in observed prices paid for different emission offset actions.

基于农业的温室气体抵消市场的价格差距
今天,全球正在努力减少温室气体净排放(GHGNE)。为了经济福祉,确定低成本的净排放抵消手段是很重要的。农业和林业作为一种提供排放补偿的手段受到了相当大的关注,因为它们占全球排放量的近20%。然而,鉴于其他排放源也提供了减少温室气体排放的机会,相对抵消成本的问题变得很重要。本文考察了与减少农业净二氧化碳当量排放相关的抵消成本,并强调了相对成本和相关成本组成部分。我们讨论了一种估算每吨温室气体排放成本的方法,并在潜在的碳市场背景下制定了买方成本、卖方支付成本以及两者之间差距的表达式。通过案例研究来估计不同情况下的差距。我们认为,可索赔与可销售温室气体数量和市场交易成本的差异,在一定程度上解释了不同排放抵消行动所支付的观察价格的巨大差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics (AJARE) provides a forum for innovative and scholarly work in agricultural and resource economics. First published in 1997, the Journal succeeds the Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics and the Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, upholding the tradition of these long-established journals. Accordingly, the editors are guided by the following objectives: -To maintain a high standard of analytical rigour offering sufficient variety of content so as to appeal to a broad spectrum of both academic and professional economists and policymakers. -In maintaining the tradition of its predecessor journals, to combine articles with policy reviews and surveys of key analytical issues in agricultural and resource economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书