Facilitating Unlearning: The Paradoxical Roles of Developmental Job Experience and Psychological Safety in Early-Career Employees

IF 1.6 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Satoshi Tanaka, Megumi Ikeda
{"title":"Facilitating Unlearning: The Paradoxical Roles of Developmental Job Experience and Psychological Safety in Early-Career Employees","authors":"Satoshi Tanaka,&nbsp;Megumi Ikeda","doi":"10.1111/ijtd.70021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Building on transformative learning theory, this study develops and tests a moderated mediation model to explain how developmental job experience fosters unlearning among early-career employees, while also illuminating the paradoxical role of psychological safety. Using two-wave survey data from 1382 young Japanese employees, hierarchical regression and moderated mediation analyses revealed that developmental job experiences directly and indirectly promote unlearning through the mediating effect of critical reflection. Paradoxically, while higher psychological safety encourages employees to undertake challenging tasks, which strengthens the positive influence of developmental job experience, it also weakens the link between developmental job experience and critical reflection by reducing the tension necessary for in-depth self-examination. These findings advance the literature on unlearning by elucidating the complex interplay between individual developmental experiences and the dynamics of organizational culture. From a practical perspective, human resource development professionals should strategically balance psychological safety and constructive tension to optimize adaptive learning and agility among younger employees.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46817,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Training and Development","volume":"30 3","pages":"258-269"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Training and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijtd.70021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Building on transformative learning theory, this study develops and tests a moderated mediation model to explain how developmental job experience fosters unlearning among early-career employees, while also illuminating the paradoxical role of psychological safety. Using two-wave survey data from 1382 young Japanese employees, hierarchical regression and moderated mediation analyses revealed that developmental job experiences directly and indirectly promote unlearning through the mediating effect of critical reflection. Paradoxically, while higher psychological safety encourages employees to undertake challenging tasks, which strengthens the positive influence of developmental job experience, it also weakens the link between developmental job experience and critical reflection by reducing the tension necessary for in-depth self-examination. These findings advance the literature on unlearning by elucidating the complex interplay between individual developmental experiences and the dynamics of organizational culture. From a practical perspective, human resource development professionals should strategically balance psychological safety and constructive tension to optimize adaptive learning and agility among younger employees.

促进遗忘:职业早期员工发展性工作经验与心理安全的矛盾角色
在转型学习理论的基础上,本研究开发并检验了一个有调节的中介模型,以解释发展性工作经验如何促进早期职业员工的遗忘,同时也揭示了心理安全的矛盾作用。通过对1382名日本青年员工的两波调查数据进行层次回归和有调节的中介分析,发现发展性工作经历通过批判性反思的中介作用直接和间接地促进了遗忘。矛盾的是,虽然较高的心理安全感鼓励员工承担具有挑战性的任务,从而加强了发展性工作体验的积极影响,但它也削弱了发展性工作体验与批判性反思之间的联系,因为它减少了深入自我检查所需的紧张感。这些发现通过阐明个体发展经历与组织文化动态之间复杂的相互作用,推动了遗忘研究的进展。从实践的角度来看,人力资源开发专业人员应该战略性地平衡心理安全和建设性紧张,以优化年轻员工的适应性学习和敏捷性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Increasing international competition has led governments and corporations to focus on ways of improving national and corporate economic performance. The effective use of human resources is seen as a prerequisite, and the training and development of employees as paramount. The growth of training and development as an academic subject reflects its growth in practice. The International Journal of Training and Development is an international forum for the reporting of high-quality, original, empirical research. Multidisciplinary, international and comparative, the journal publishes research which ranges from the theoretical, conceptual and methodological to more policy-oriented types of work. The scope of the Journal is training and development, broadly defined. This includes: The determinants of training specifying and testing the explanatory variables which may be related to training identifying and analysing specific factors which give rise to a need for training and development as well as the processes by which those needs become defined, for example, training needs analysis the need for performance improvement the training and development implications of various performance improvement techniques, such as appraisal and assessment the analysis of competence Training and development practice the design, development and delivery of training the learning and development process itself competency-based approaches evaluation: the relationship between training and individual, corporate and macroeconomic performance Policy and strategy organisational aspects of training and development public policy issues questions of infrastructure issues relating to the training and development profession The Journal’s scope encompasses both corporate and public policy analysis. International and comparative work is particularly welcome, as is research which embraces emerging issues and developments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书