Remittance Cost: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda Using the METRICS Framework

IF 6.6 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Journal of Economic Surveys Pub Date : 2026-08-05 Epub Date: 2026-02-09 DOI:10.1111/joes.70069
Swapnilsingh Yuwrajsingh Thakur, Prashant Dev Yadav, Anshul Verma, Yatin Mankame
{"title":"Remittance Cost: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda Using the METRICS Framework","authors":"Swapnilsingh Yuwrajsingh Thakur,&nbsp;Prashant Dev Yadav,&nbsp;Anshul Verma,&nbsp;Yatin Mankame","doi":"10.1111/joes.70069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>High remittance costs are a global challenge. Very few studies adopt a holistic approach, such as PESTLE, which addresses Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, and Environmental factors. A systematic literature review can help identify areas needing attention. We identified the articles using the Antecedents, Decisions, and Outcome (ADO) framework to construct search queries. We follovwed the PRISMA framework. We conducted a bibliometric analysis, followed by a manual content analysis using the METRICS framework. (Methodology, Environment, Theory, Relationship, Index, Conditions, and Span). Established coding reliability, with Cohen's k. A quality appraisal was performed. The literature reveals a robust negative association between remittance costs and remittance, with cost elasticities indicating that a 10% reduction in costs increases remittance flows by 1.6%-2%. The least studied dimension is environment. Residual reputational bias during quality appraisal cannot be excluded. Researchers must adopt a multi-dimensional approach to studying remittance costs. In-depth research can help achieve SDG 10c and the G20 cost reduction target, positively impacting migrant workers and their families. We demonstrate how to utilize the METRICS framework for manual content analysis and identify research gaps.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51374,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Surveys","volume":"40 4","pages":"1834-1853"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Surveys","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joes.70069","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High remittance costs are a global challenge. Very few studies adopt a holistic approach, such as PESTLE, which addresses Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, and Environmental factors. A systematic literature review can help identify areas needing attention. We identified the articles using the Antecedents, Decisions, and Outcome (ADO) framework to construct search queries. We follovwed the PRISMA framework. We conducted a bibliometric analysis, followed by a manual content analysis using the METRICS framework. (Methodology, Environment, Theory, Relationship, Index, Conditions, and Span). Established coding reliability, with Cohen's k. A quality appraisal was performed. The literature reveals a robust negative association between remittance costs and remittance, with cost elasticities indicating that a 10% reduction in costs increases remittance flows by 1.6%-2%. The least studied dimension is environment. Residual reputational bias during quality appraisal cannot be excluded. Researchers must adopt a multi-dimensional approach to studying remittance costs. In-depth research can help achieve SDG 10c and the G20 cost reduction target, positively impacting migrant workers and their families. We demonstrate how to utilize the METRICS framework for manual content analysis and identify research gaps.

汇款成本:系统文献回顾及未来研究议程
高昂的汇款成本是一项全球性挑战。很少有研究采用整体方法,如PESTLE,它涉及政治、经济、社会、技术、法律和环境因素。系统的文献回顾有助于确定需要注意的领域。我们使用先行项、决策和结果(ADO)框架来构建搜索查询,从而确定文章。我们遵循PRISMA框架。我们进行了文献计量分析,然后使用METRICS框架进行了手动内容分析。(方法、环境、理论、关系、指标、条件、跨度)。建立编码可靠性,与科恩的k。进行质量评估。文献揭示了汇款成本与汇款之间存在强烈的负相关关系,成本弹性表明,成本降低10%会使汇款流量增加1.6%-2%。研究最少的维度是环境。不能排除质量评价过程中残留的声誉偏差。研究人员必须采用多维度的方法来研究汇款成本。深入研究有助于实现可持续发展目标10c和G20降低成本目标,对农民工及其家庭产生积极影响。我们演示了如何利用METRICS框架进行手工内容分析和识别研究差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: As economics becomes increasingly specialized, communication amongst economists becomes even more important. The Journal of Economic Surveys seeks to improve the communication of new ideas. It provides a means by which economists can keep abreast of recent developments beyond their immediate specialization. Areas covered include: - economics - econometrics - economic history - business economics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书