Students Increased Their Conceptual Understanding of Biodiversity After a Modeling-Based Teaching and Learning Sequence

IF 4 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Gonzalo M. A. Bermudez, Moritz Krell
{"title":"Students Increased Their Conceptual Understanding of Biodiversity After a Modeling-Based Teaching and Learning Sequence","authors":"Gonzalo M. A. Bermudez,&nbsp;Moritz Krell","doi":"10.1007/s11191-025-00707-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Biodiversity, a complex and multifaceted concept, is often reduced to species richness in educational contexts and other critical components are neglected (functional types, evenness, interactions, and spatial and temporal distribution). This study investigated students’ and teachers’ modeling-based talk and the impact of a modeling-based teaching and learning sequence (MBTLS) on 17–18-year-old students’ conceptual understanding of biodiversity in a secondary school setting in Argentina. Through the qualitative content analysis of teachers’ and students’ modeling-related talk, this research describes how modeling activities with rubber tokens and threads on a field trip and in the classroom can expand students’ biodiversity understanding beyond species-centered perspectives. It also identifies key teaching strategies (generating, evaluating, and modifying models) and students’ modeling activities (exploration, development, and prediction) that facilitate the construction, evaluation, and refinement of biodiversity models. While species remained the predominant component referred to in modeling-related talk, functional and genetic diversity, among others, gained prominence throughout the MBTLS, showcasing the potential of an MBTLS to broaden biodiversity education. Additionally, the findings highlight the interplay among real, material, and abstract planes of biodiversity models, emphasizing their role in connecting scientific theories to real-world phenomena. Pre- and posttest analyses indicated significant improvements in students’ understanding of biodiversity components and attributes, particularly functional richness and evenness. However, because of teachers’ modifying models and the scarcity of students’ predictions, challenges remain in fostering cyclic modeling practices and including experimentation on the modeling of biodiversity in education. This research underscores the importance of updating curricula and teacher training to incorporate modern biodiversity concepts and modeling strategies, empowering students to make informed socioscientific decisions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":771,"journal":{"name":"Science & Education","volume":"35 4","pages":"1195 - 1242"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11191-025-00707-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biodiversity, a complex and multifaceted concept, is often reduced to species richness in educational contexts and other critical components are neglected (functional types, evenness, interactions, and spatial and temporal distribution). This study investigated students’ and teachers’ modeling-based talk and the impact of a modeling-based teaching and learning sequence (MBTLS) on 17–18-year-old students’ conceptual understanding of biodiversity in a secondary school setting in Argentina. Through the qualitative content analysis of teachers’ and students’ modeling-related talk, this research describes how modeling activities with rubber tokens and threads on a field trip and in the classroom can expand students’ biodiversity understanding beyond species-centered perspectives. It also identifies key teaching strategies (generating, evaluating, and modifying models) and students’ modeling activities (exploration, development, and prediction) that facilitate the construction, evaluation, and refinement of biodiversity models. While species remained the predominant component referred to in modeling-related talk, functional and genetic diversity, among others, gained prominence throughout the MBTLS, showcasing the potential of an MBTLS to broaden biodiversity education. Additionally, the findings highlight the interplay among real, material, and abstract planes of biodiversity models, emphasizing their role in connecting scientific theories to real-world phenomena. Pre- and posttest analyses indicated significant improvements in students’ understanding of biodiversity components and attributes, particularly functional richness and evenness. However, because of teachers’ modifying models and the scarcity of students’ predictions, challenges remain in fostering cyclic modeling practices and including experimentation on the modeling of biodiversity in education. This research underscores the importance of updating curricula and teacher training to incorporate modern biodiversity concepts and modeling strategies, empowering students to make informed socioscientific decisions.

通过基于模型的教学过程,学生对生物多样性的概念理解有所提高
生物多样性是一个复杂而多方面的概念,在教育背景下往往被简化为物种丰富度,而忽略了其他关键组成部分(功能类型、均匀性、相互作用和时空分布)。本研究调查了阿根廷一所中学学生和教师基于建模的谈话,以及基于建模的教学序列(MBTLS)对17 - 18岁学生生物多样性概念理解的影响。本研究通过对师生建模相关演讲的定性内容分析,描述了在实地考察和课堂上使用橡胶符号和线索的建模活动如何扩展学生对生物多样性的理解,超越以物种为中心的视角。它还确定了促进生物多样性模型的构建、评估和改进的关键教学策略(生成、评估和修改模型)和学生的建模活动(探索、开发和预测)。虽然物种在建模相关的讨论中仍然是主要的组成部分,但功能和遗传多样性等在MBTLS中获得了突出的地位,显示了MBTLS在扩大生物多样性教育方面的潜力。此外,研究结果强调了生物多样性模型的真实、物质和抽象层面之间的相互作用,强调了它们在将科学理论与现实世界现象联系起来方面的作用。测试前和测试后的分析表明,学生对生物多样性组成和属性的理解显著提高,特别是功能丰富度和均匀度。然而,由于教师对模型的修改和学生预测的稀缺性,在促进循环建模实践和包括教育中生物多样性建模实验方面仍然存在挑战。这项研究强调了更新课程和教师培训的重要性,以纳入现代生物多样性概念和建模策略,使学生能够做出明智的社会科学决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science & Education
Science & Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
14.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Science Education publishes original articles on the latest issues and trends occurring internationally in science curriculum, instruction, learning, policy and preparation of science teachers with the aim to advance our knowledge of science education theory and practice. In addition to original articles, the journal features the following special sections: -Learning : consisting of theoretical and empirical research studies on learning of science. We invite manuscripts that investigate learning and its change and growth from various lenses, including psychological, social, cognitive, sociohistorical, and affective. Studies examining the relationship of learning to teaching, the science knowledge and practices, the learners themselves, and the contexts (social, political, physical, ideological, institutional, epistemological, and cultural) are similarly welcome. -Issues and Trends : consisting primarily of analytical, interpretive, or persuasive essays on current educational, social, or philosophical issues and trends relevant to the teaching of science. This special section particularly seeks to promote informed dialogues about current issues in science education, and carefully reasoned papers representing disparate viewpoints are welcomed. Manuscripts submitted for this section may be in the form of a position paper, a polemical piece, or a creative commentary. -Science Learning in Everyday Life : consisting of analytical, interpretative, or philosophical papers regarding learning science outside of the formal classroom. Papers should investigate experiences in settings such as community, home, the Internet, after school settings, museums, and other opportunities that develop science interest, knowledge or practices across the life span. Attention to issues and factors relating to equity in science learning are especially encouraged.. -Science Teacher Education [...]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书