A Responsibility Framework for Geometric Specification Management through RACI Integration

Procedia CIRP Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-05 DOI:10.1016/j.procir.2026.03.131
Mattia Maltauro, Alina Sersch, Gianmaria Concheri, Peter Gust, Roberto Meneghello
{"title":"A Responsibility Framework for Geometric Specification Management through RACI Integration","authors":"Mattia Maltauro,&nbsp;Alina Sersch,&nbsp;Gianmaria Concheri,&nbsp;Peter Gust,&nbsp;Roberto Meneghello","doi":"10.1016/j.procir.2026.03.131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Geometrical Product Specification (GPS) plays a critical role in ensuring functional compliance, manufacturability, and verifiability across the product development lifecycle. Recent research has highlighted the evolutionary nature of specifications: from functional (FunSpec) to manufacturing (ManSpec), verification (VeriSpec), and contractual (ConSpec) documents; yet the allocation of clear responsibilities among stakeholders remains underdeveloped. This paper proposes the integration of the RACI (Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed) matrix into the ISO GPS workflow as a structured means to clarify roles, responsibilities, and communication pathways across design, manufacturing, and quality assurance domains, therefore building upon the responsibility principle presented in ISO 8015. Starting from the specification document types presented in ISO/TS 21619 and the interaction between these document types, this study introduces a RACI-supported framework that maps stakeholder involvement to each stage of specification evolution. A possible implementation example demonstrates how the method enhances transparency, prevents overlaps or gaps in responsibilities, and supports compliance with industrial standards such as ISO 9001. The results suggest that embedding RACI within GPS workflows strengthens interdisciplinary collaboration, reduces ambiguity, and lays the foundation for responsibility-aware product specification management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20535,"journal":{"name":"Procedia CIRP","volume":"145 ","pages":"Pages 43-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Procedia CIRP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212827126007456","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Geometrical Product Specification (GPS) plays a critical role in ensuring functional compliance, manufacturability, and verifiability across the product development lifecycle. Recent research has highlighted the evolutionary nature of specifications: from functional (FunSpec) to manufacturing (ManSpec), verification (VeriSpec), and contractual (ConSpec) documents; yet the allocation of clear responsibilities among stakeholders remains underdeveloped. This paper proposes the integration of the RACI (Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed) matrix into the ISO GPS workflow as a structured means to clarify roles, responsibilities, and communication pathways across design, manufacturing, and quality assurance domains, therefore building upon the responsibility principle presented in ISO 8015. Starting from the specification document types presented in ISO/TS 21619 and the interaction between these document types, this study introduces a RACI-supported framework that maps stakeholder involvement to each stage of specification evolution. A possible implementation example demonstrates how the method enhances transparency, prevents overlaps or gaps in responsibilities, and supports compliance with industrial standards such as ISO 9001. The results suggest that embedding RACI within GPS workflows strengthens interdisciplinary collaboration, reduces ambiguity, and lays the foundation for responsibility-aware product specification management.
基于RACI集成的几何规格管理责任框架
几何产品规格(GPS)在确保产品开发生命周期中的功能遵从性、可制造性和可验证性方面起着关键作用。最近的研究强调了规范的进化本质:从功能(FunSpec)到制造(ManSpec),验证(VeriSpec)和合同(ConSpec)文档;然而,在利益相关者之间分配明确的责任仍然不发达。本文建议将RACI(负责、问责、咨询、知情)矩阵整合到ISO GPS工作流程中,作为一种结构化的手段,以澄清设计、制造和质量保证领域的角色、责任和沟通途径,从而建立在ISO 8015中提出的责任原则之上。从ISO/TS 21619中提出的规范文档类型以及这些文档类型之间的交互开始,本研究引入了一个raci支持的框架,该框架将涉众参与映射到规范演进的每个阶段。一个可能的实现示例演示了该方法如何增强透明度,防止职责重叠或空白,并支持遵守诸如ISO 9001之类的工业标准。结果表明,在GPS工作流中嵌入RACI加强了跨学科协作,减少了歧义,并为责任感知产品规格管理奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书