Administrative coordination, integrated plans, and policy capacities for local climate policy implementation

IF 4.5 3区 管理学 Q1 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Francesco Sarti
{"title":"Administrative coordination, integrated plans, and policy capacities for local climate policy implementation","authors":"Francesco Sarti","doi":"10.1007/s11077-026-09621-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The literature has gone to great lengths to describe how administrative coordination can support climate policy implementation. Yet few studies have adopted both a configurational and an actor-oriented perspective to understand which combination of policy capacities and policy design features bureaucrats perceive as necessary or sufficient to effectively engage in administrative coordination for climate policy implementation. Analyzing eighteen local departments implementing climate plans in four cities (Bologna, Lausanne, Padua, Zurich) and across various policy sectors, a configurational approach based on mixed methods allows testing two hypotheses: the first (H1) is that a combination of multiple, high-level organizational capabilities is sufficient for effective coordination. The second one (H2) is that both integrated planning and high organizational policy capacities together are sufficient for effective coordination. Finding evidence for H2, this paper contributes to the ongoing debate regarding the integrative policy capacities needed to foster the ecological transition at the local level. It makes a distinctive contribution by systematically clarifying how the <jats:italic>interplay</jats:italic> between policy capacities and policy design features shapes administrative coordination outputs.","PeriodicalId":51433,"journal":{"name":"Policy Sciences","volume":"360 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-026-09621-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The literature has gone to great lengths to describe how administrative coordination can support climate policy implementation. Yet few studies have adopted both a configurational and an actor-oriented perspective to understand which combination of policy capacities and policy design features bureaucrats perceive as necessary or sufficient to effectively engage in administrative coordination for climate policy implementation. Analyzing eighteen local departments implementing climate plans in four cities (Bologna, Lausanne, Padua, Zurich) and across various policy sectors, a configurational approach based on mixed methods allows testing two hypotheses: the first (H1) is that a combination of multiple, high-level organizational capabilities is sufficient for effective coordination. The second one (H2) is that both integrated planning and high organizational policy capacities together are sufficient for effective coordination. Finding evidence for H2, this paper contributes to the ongoing debate regarding the integrative policy capacities needed to foster the ecological transition at the local level. It makes a distinctive contribution by systematically clarifying how the interplay between policy capacities and policy design features shapes administrative coordination outputs.
地方气候政策实施的行政协调、综合规划和政策能力
文献已经花了很大篇幅描述行政协调如何支持气候政策的实施。然而,很少有研究同时采用配置和行为主体导向的视角来理解,官僚们认为哪些政策能力和政策设计特征的组合是有效地参与气候政策实施的行政协调所必需或充分的。通过分析在四个城市(博洛尼亚、洛桑、帕多瓦、苏黎世)实施气候计划的18个地方部门以及不同的政策部门,基于混合方法的配置方法可以检验两个假设:第一种(H1)是多种高层组织能力的组合足以实现有效协调。第二个(H2)是综合规划和高组织政策能力共同足以实现有效协调。通过寻找H2的证据,本文为正在进行的关于在地方层面促进生态转型所需的综合政策能力的辩论做出了贡献。它通过系统地阐明政策能力和政策设计特点之间的相互作用如何影响行政协调产出,作出了独特的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Policy Sciences
Policy Sciences Multiple-
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The policy sciences are distinctive within the policy movement in that they embrace the scholarly traditions innovated and elaborated by Harold D. Lasswell and Myres S. McDougal. Within these pages we provide space for approaches that are problem-oriented, contextual, and multi-method in orientation. There are many other journals in which authors can take top-down, deductive, and large-sample approach or adopt a primarily theoretical focus. Policy Sciences encourages systematic and empirical investigations in which problems are clearly identified from a practical and theoretical perspective, are well situated in the extant literature, and are investigated utilizing methodologies compatible with contextual, as opposed to reductionist, understandings. We tend not to publish pieces that are solely theoretical, but favor works in which the applied policy lessons are clearly articulated. Policy Sciences favors, but does not publish exclusively, works that either explicitly or implicitly utilize the policy sciences framework. The policy sciences can be applied to articles with greater or lesser intensity to accommodate the focus of an author’s work. At the minimum, this means taking a problem oriented, multi-method or contextual approach. At the fullest expression, it may mean leveraging central theory or explicitly applying aspects of the framework, which is comprised of three principal dimensions: (1) social process, which is mapped in terms of participants, perspectives, situations, base values, strategies, outcomes and effects, with values (power, wealth, enlightenment, skill, rectitude, respect, well-being, and affection) being the key elements in understanding participants’ behaviors and interactions; (2) decision process, which is mapped in terms of seven functions—intelligence, promotion, prescription, invocation, application, termination, and appraisal; and (3) problem orientation, which comprises the intellectual tasks of clarifying goals, describing trends, analyzing conditions, projecting developments, and inventing, evaluating, and selecting alternatives. There is a more extensive core literature that also applies and can be visited at the policy sciences website: http://www.policysciences.org/classicworks.cfm. In addition to articles that explicitly utilize the policy sciences framework, Policy Sciences has a long tradition of publishing papers that draw on various aspects of that framework and its central theory as well as high quality conceptual pieces that address key challenges, opportunities, or approaches in ways congruent with the perspective that this journal strives to maintain and extend.Officially cited as: Policy Sci
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书