Analyzing Online Migration Forums: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing for International Migration Research

IF 2.9 1区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY
Nari Yoo, Donghun Kim, Sou Hyun Jang, Eric Fong
{"title":"Analyzing Online Migration Forums: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing for International Migration Research","authors":"Nari Yoo, Donghun Kim, Sou Hyun Jang, Eric Fong","doi":"10.1177/01979183261473318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In contemporary migration studies, online forums are common spaces where people exchange information and seek advice about international migration. This methods note introduces the Reddit community r/IWantOut as a data source for studying migration aspirations and presents a validated natural language processing (NLP) pipeline for analyzing it. The forum's community rules require posters to encode age, gender, origin, and intended destinations in a fixed title format, so users label their own migration aspirations in a semi-machine-readable form when they post. Using 156,313 submissions from 2009 to 2026 (58,892 after cleaning), we demonstrate three analytical approaches: (1) time-series analysis to identify temporal shifts in discourse volume, (2) dictionary- and rule-based extraction, together with Named Entity Recognition (NER), to recover origin–destination pairs and sociodemographic attributes from the structured titles, and (3) large language model (LLM)-based zero-shot classification, used only for classifying migration motivations. Validation against human-coded labels across three LLMs (GPT-4.1, Claude-3.5-Sonnet, and DeepSeek-V3) showed that GPT-4.1 achieved the highest agreement (mean κ = 0.566), with substantial agreement on push factors, moderate agreement on pull and enabling factors, and fair agreement on constraining factors. Applying this approach to 56,242 international migration posts, we found that enabling factors (individual-level resources) appeared most frequently (77.3%), followed by constraining factors (49.3%), pull factors (37.2%), and push factors (23.6%). For each method, we provide practical guidance on implementation, data access, and validation, and reflect on methodological limitations and ethical considerations.","PeriodicalId":48229,"journal":{"name":"International Migration Review","volume":"279 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Migration Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01979183261473318","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In contemporary migration studies, online forums are common spaces where people exchange information and seek advice about international migration. This methods note introduces the Reddit community r/IWantOut as a data source for studying migration aspirations and presents a validated natural language processing (NLP) pipeline for analyzing it. The forum's community rules require posters to encode age, gender, origin, and intended destinations in a fixed title format, so users label their own migration aspirations in a semi-machine-readable form when they post. Using 156,313 submissions from 2009 to 2026 (58,892 after cleaning), we demonstrate three analytical approaches: (1) time-series analysis to identify temporal shifts in discourse volume, (2) dictionary- and rule-based extraction, together with Named Entity Recognition (NER), to recover origin–destination pairs and sociodemographic attributes from the structured titles, and (3) large language model (LLM)-based zero-shot classification, used only for classifying migration motivations. Validation against human-coded labels across three LLMs (GPT-4.1, Claude-3.5-Sonnet, and DeepSeek-V3) showed that GPT-4.1 achieved the highest agreement (mean κ = 0.566), with substantial agreement on push factors, moderate agreement on pull and enabling factors, and fair agreement on constraining factors. Applying this approach to 56,242 international migration posts, we found that enabling factors (individual-level resources) appeared most frequently (77.3%), followed by constraining factors (49.3%), pull factors (37.2%), and push factors (23.6%). For each method, we provide practical guidance on implementation, data access, and validation, and reflect on methodological limitations and ethical considerations.
分析在线移民论坛:国际移民研究的自然语言处理介绍
在当代移民研究中,在线论坛是人们交流信息和寻求有关国际移民建议的共同空间。本方法说明介绍了Reddit社区r/IWantOut作为研究迁移愿望的数据源,并提出了一个经过验证的自然语言处理(NLP)管道来分析它。论坛的社区规则要求发帖者以固定的标题格式对年龄、性别、来源地和预期目的地进行编码,这样用户在发帖时就能以半机器可读的形式标注自己的移民愿望。使用2009年至2026年的156,313份提交(清理后为58,892份),我们展示了三种分析方法:(1)时间序列分析,以识别话语量的时间变化;(2)基于字典和规则的提取,以及命名实体识别(NER),从结构化标题中恢复原点-目的地对和社会人口统计学属性;(3)基于大型语言模型(LLM)的零概率分类,仅用于对迁移动机进行分类。对三个llm (GPT-4.1、Claude-3.5-Sonnet和DeepSeek-V3)的人工编码标签进行验证表明,GPT-4.1达到了最高的一致性(平均κ = 0.566),在推动因素上具有基本一致性,在拉动和使能因素上具有中等一致性,在约束因素上具有公平一致性。将该方法应用于56,242个国际移民站点,我们发现启用因素(个人层面的资源)出现频率最高(77.3%),其次是约束因素(49.3%),拉动因素(37.2%)和推动因素(23.6%)。对于每种方法,我们都提供了实施、数据访问和验证的实践指导,并反思了方法的局限性和伦理考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
7.90%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: International Migration Review is an interdisciplinary peer-reviewed journal created to encourage and facilitate the study of all aspects of sociodemographic, historical, economic, political, legislative and international migration. It is internationally regarded as the principal journal in the field facilitating study of international migration, ethnic group relations, and refugee movements. Through an interdisciplinary approach and from an international perspective, IMR provides the single most comprehensive forum devoted exclusively to the analysis and review of international population movements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书