{"title":"A Two-Level Semantic Segmentation Framework for Visual Corrosion Pattern Assessment in Steel Bridges","authors":"Sal Saad Al Deen Taher, Ji Dang","doi":"10.1016/j.cacaie.2026.100173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Corrosion assessment in steel bridges requires not only estimating the spatial extent of visible deterioration but also distinguishing visual corrosion appearances that may support inspection interpretation. Existing vision-based corrosion-segmentation studies predominantly formulate the task as binary corrosion-versus-background mapping, which supports damage localization but provides limited information regarding corrosion-pattern distribution. This study proposes a two-level semantic segmentation framework for visual corrosion assessment of steel bridge components. Level 1 performs binary pixel-wise segmentation to quantify visible corrosion coverage, whereas Level 2 assigns corrosion pixels to four inspection-oriented visual categories: Uniform, Crevice, Underfilm, and Other Localized corrosion. Field images were annotated using an operational visual taxonomy by the first author, and category-label reproducibility was subsequently evaluated through a blinded second-annotator audit of the categorized validation polygons. Transformer-based and CNN-based models were evaluated using common image subsets, input resolution, and evaluation metrics, while model-specific implementation and optimization settings were documented explicitly. Performance was assessed using region-overlap metrics, class-wise precision, recall, and F1-score, and Boundary-F1 to quantify edge agreement along irregular corrosion fronts. The highest-performing binary configuration achieved an mIoU of 0.843. The adopted formula-derived Level 2 configuration achieved a five-class mIoU of 0.605 and a mean corrosion-category F1-score of 0.678; a manual-weighting variant produced a marginally higher five-class mIoU of 0.607 but was not adopted as the primary formula-derived SegFormer configuration. Binary-merged evaluation showed that Level 2 retained substantial corrosion-coverage capability, although dedicated binary models remained superior for foreground–background segmentation. The framework provides complementary representations of corrosion coverage, visual-category distribution, and boundary quality. It is intended to support, rather than replace, expert inspection, field measurement, and engineering evaluation.","PeriodicalId":156,"journal":{"name":"Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cacaie.2026.100173","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Corrosion assessment in steel bridges requires not only estimating the spatial extent of visible deterioration but also distinguishing visual corrosion appearances that may support inspection interpretation. Existing vision-based corrosion-segmentation studies predominantly formulate the task as binary corrosion-versus-background mapping, which supports damage localization but provides limited information regarding corrosion-pattern distribution. This study proposes a two-level semantic segmentation framework for visual corrosion assessment of steel bridge components. Level 1 performs binary pixel-wise segmentation to quantify visible corrosion coverage, whereas Level 2 assigns corrosion pixels to four inspection-oriented visual categories: Uniform, Crevice, Underfilm, and Other Localized corrosion. Field images were annotated using an operational visual taxonomy by the first author, and category-label reproducibility was subsequently evaluated through a blinded second-annotator audit of the categorized validation polygons. Transformer-based and CNN-based models were evaluated using common image subsets, input resolution, and evaluation metrics, while model-specific implementation and optimization settings were documented explicitly. Performance was assessed using region-overlap metrics, class-wise precision, recall, and F1-score, and Boundary-F1 to quantify edge agreement along irregular corrosion fronts. The highest-performing binary configuration achieved an mIoU of 0.843. The adopted formula-derived Level 2 configuration achieved a five-class mIoU of 0.605 and a mean corrosion-category F1-score of 0.678; a manual-weighting variant produced a marginally higher five-class mIoU of 0.607 but was not adopted as the primary formula-derived SegFormer configuration. Binary-merged evaluation showed that Level 2 retained substantial corrosion-coverage capability, although dedicated binary models remained superior for foreground–background segmentation. The framework provides complementary representations of corrosion coverage, visual-category distribution, and boundary quality. It is intended to support, rather than replace, expert inspection, field measurement, and engineering evaluation.
期刊介绍:
Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering stands as a scholarly, peer-reviewed archival journal, serving as a vital link between advancements in computer technology and civil and infrastructure engineering. The journal serves as a distinctive platform for the publication of original articles, spotlighting novel computational techniques and inventive applications of computers. Specifically, it concentrates on recent progress in computer and information technologies, fostering the development and application of emerging computing paradigms.
Encompassing a broad scope, the journal addresses bridge, construction, environmental, highway, geotechnical, structural, transportation, and water resources engineering. It extends its reach to the management of infrastructure systems, covering domains such as highways, bridges, pavements, airports, and utilities. The journal delves into areas like artificial intelligence, cognitive modeling, concurrent engineering, database management, distributed computing, evolutionary computing, fuzzy logic, genetic algorithms, geometric modeling, internet-based technologies, knowledge discovery and engineering, machine learning, mobile computing, multimedia technologies, networking, neural network computing, optimization and search, parallel processing, robotics, smart structures, software engineering, virtual reality, and visualization techniques.