The Role of Perioperative C-Reactive Protein Measurement in Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

IF 0.9
Mari Babasiz, Andreas Christian Strauss, Max Jaenisch, Marius Bruehl, Robert Ossendorff, Martin Resl, Dieter Christian Wirtz, Thomas Wallny
{"title":"The Role of Perioperative C-Reactive Protein Measurement in Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.","authors":"Mari Babasiz, Andreas Christian Strauss, Max Jaenisch, Marius Bruehl, Robert Ossendorff, Martin Resl, Dieter Christian Wirtz, Thomas Wallny","doi":"10.1055/a-2906-0174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>C-reactive protein (CRP) is an established component of perioperative diagnostics in primary hip and knee arthroplasty; however, its clinical value and the validity of commonly used thresholds remain controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the pre- and postoperative handling of CRP at certified German arthroplasty centres (EPZ) and to critically appraise its clinical relevance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 12-item internet-based questionnaire on the perioperative use of CRP was mailed to all 659 centres certified in April 2024; 134 centres participated anonymously. In 2023, these centres had performed a total of 91793 primary hip and knee arthroplasties.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preoperatively, 130 of 134 centres (97.0%) determined CRP routinely. The thresholds applied varied considerably (< 5 mg/l: 48 centres; < 10 mg/l: 69; > 10 mg/l: 11). When the threshold was exceeded, 78 centres primarily referred patients for external evaluation, whereas 39 performed the work-up themselves. Most centres considered the probability of identifying a treatable focus to be low; when no focus was found, 67 of 130 centres proceeded with surgery nonetheless. Postoperatively, 126 centres determined CRP, but only 93 considered this necessary. The timing varied markedly, with 40.5% measuring as early as the first postoperative day. Additional inflammatory parameters were rarely obtained. Only seven centres based the indication for revision primarily on the CRP value.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CRP is used frequently but heterogeneously in perioperative diagnostics. Given its limited specificity, particularly for mildly elevated values, and the well-known physiological postoperative increase, routine postoperative CRP measurement appears dispensable in uncomplicated cases. A standardised checklist and a stronger clinical focus could render diagnostics more efficient.</p>","PeriodicalId":94274,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Unfallchirurgie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Unfallchirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2906-0174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: C-reactive protein (CRP) is an established component of perioperative diagnostics in primary hip and knee arthroplasty; however, its clinical value and the validity of commonly used thresholds remain controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the pre- and postoperative handling of CRP at certified German arthroplasty centres (EPZ) and to critically appraise its clinical relevance.

Methods: A 12-item internet-based questionnaire on the perioperative use of CRP was mailed to all 659 centres certified in April 2024; 134 centres participated anonymously. In 2023, these centres had performed a total of 91793 primary hip and knee arthroplasties.

Results: Preoperatively, 130 of 134 centres (97.0%) determined CRP routinely. The thresholds applied varied considerably (< 5 mg/l: 48 centres; < 10 mg/l: 69; > 10 mg/l: 11). When the threshold was exceeded, 78 centres primarily referred patients for external evaluation, whereas 39 performed the work-up themselves. Most centres considered the probability of identifying a treatable focus to be low; when no focus was found, 67 of 130 centres proceeded with surgery nonetheless. Postoperatively, 126 centres determined CRP, but only 93 considered this necessary. The timing varied markedly, with 40.5% measuring as early as the first postoperative day. Additional inflammatory parameters were rarely obtained. Only seven centres based the indication for revision primarily on the CRP value.

Conclusion: CRP is used frequently but heterogeneously in perioperative diagnostics. Given its limited specificity, particularly for mildly elevated values, and the well-known physiological postoperative increase, routine postoperative CRP measurement appears dispensable in uncomplicated cases. A standardised checklist and a stronger clinical focus could render diagnostics more efficient.

c -反应蛋白测定在初次髋关节和膝关节置换术中的作用。
背景:c反应蛋白(CRP)是原发性髋关节和膝关节置换术围手术期诊断的一个既定组成部分;然而,其临床价值和常用阈值的有效性仍然存在争议。本研究的目的是评估经认证的德国关节成形术中心(EPZ)对CRP的术前和术后处理,并批判性地评估其临床相关性。方法:于2024年4月将一份包含12个项目的CRP围手术期使用网络问卷邮寄至所有659家经认证的中心;134个中心匿名参与。在2023年,这些中心共进行了91793例髋关节和膝关节置换术。结果:术前,134个中心中有130个(97.0%)常规检测CRP。应用的阈值差异很大(10 mg/l: 11)。当超过阈值时,78个中心主要将患者转介给外部评估,而39个中心自行进行检查。大多数中心认为确定可治疗病灶的可能性很低;当没有找到病灶时,130个中心中有67个继续进行手术。术后126个中心检测CRP,但只有93个中心认为有必要。时间变化明显,40.5%早在术后第一天测量。很少获得其他炎症参数。只有7个中心主要以CRP值作为修改适应症的依据。结论:CRP在围手术期诊断中的应用频率较高,但差异较大。鉴于其有限的特异性,特别是轻度升高的值,以及众所周知的术后生理升高,术后常规CRP测量在无并发症的病例中似乎是可有可无的。标准化的检查表和更强的临床重点可以提高诊断效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书