Mari Babasiz, Andreas Christian Strauss, Max Jaenisch, Marius Bruehl, Robert Ossendorff, Martin Resl, Dieter Christian Wirtz, Thomas Wallny
{"title":"The Role of Perioperative C-Reactive Protein Measurement in Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.","authors":"Mari Babasiz, Andreas Christian Strauss, Max Jaenisch, Marius Bruehl, Robert Ossendorff, Martin Resl, Dieter Christian Wirtz, Thomas Wallny","doi":"10.1055/a-2906-0174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>C-reactive protein (CRP) is an established component of perioperative diagnostics in primary hip and knee arthroplasty; however, its clinical value and the validity of commonly used thresholds remain controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the pre- and postoperative handling of CRP at certified German arthroplasty centres (EPZ) and to critically appraise its clinical relevance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 12-item internet-based questionnaire on the perioperative use of CRP was mailed to all 659 centres certified in April 2024; 134 centres participated anonymously. In 2023, these centres had performed a total of 91793 primary hip and knee arthroplasties.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preoperatively, 130 of 134 centres (97.0%) determined CRP routinely. The thresholds applied varied considerably (< 5 mg/l: 48 centres; < 10 mg/l: 69; > 10 mg/l: 11). When the threshold was exceeded, 78 centres primarily referred patients for external evaluation, whereas 39 performed the work-up themselves. Most centres considered the probability of identifying a treatable focus to be low; when no focus was found, 67 of 130 centres proceeded with surgery nonetheless. Postoperatively, 126 centres determined CRP, but only 93 considered this necessary. The timing varied markedly, with 40.5% measuring as early as the first postoperative day. Additional inflammatory parameters were rarely obtained. Only seven centres based the indication for revision primarily on the CRP value.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CRP is used frequently but heterogeneously in perioperative diagnostics. Given its limited specificity, particularly for mildly elevated values, and the well-known physiological postoperative increase, routine postoperative CRP measurement appears dispensable in uncomplicated cases. A standardised checklist and a stronger clinical focus could render diagnostics more efficient.</p>","PeriodicalId":94274,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Unfallchirurgie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Unfallchirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2906-0174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: C-reactive protein (CRP) is an established component of perioperative diagnostics in primary hip and knee arthroplasty; however, its clinical value and the validity of commonly used thresholds remain controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the pre- and postoperative handling of CRP at certified German arthroplasty centres (EPZ) and to critically appraise its clinical relevance.
Methods: A 12-item internet-based questionnaire on the perioperative use of CRP was mailed to all 659 centres certified in April 2024; 134 centres participated anonymously. In 2023, these centres had performed a total of 91793 primary hip and knee arthroplasties.
Results: Preoperatively, 130 of 134 centres (97.0%) determined CRP routinely. The thresholds applied varied considerably (< 5 mg/l: 48 centres; < 10 mg/l: 69; > 10 mg/l: 11). When the threshold was exceeded, 78 centres primarily referred patients for external evaluation, whereas 39 performed the work-up themselves. Most centres considered the probability of identifying a treatable focus to be low; when no focus was found, 67 of 130 centres proceeded with surgery nonetheless. Postoperatively, 126 centres determined CRP, but only 93 considered this necessary. The timing varied markedly, with 40.5% measuring as early as the first postoperative day. Additional inflammatory parameters were rarely obtained. Only seven centres based the indication for revision primarily on the CRP value.
Conclusion: CRP is used frequently but heterogeneously in perioperative diagnostics. Given its limited specificity, particularly for mildly elevated values, and the well-known physiological postoperative increase, routine postoperative CRP measurement appears dispensable in uncomplicated cases. A standardised checklist and a stronger clinical focus could render diagnostics more efficient.