The addition of PSMA PET in selecting candidates for prostate cancer focal therapy

IF 2 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
BJUI compass Pub Date : 2026-08-06 DOI:10.1002/bco2.70264
Kylie Yen-Yi Lim, Mohammad Asghari-Jafarabadi, Arveen A. Kalapara, Julian Smith, Mark Frydenberg, Weranja Ranasinghe
{"title":"The addition of PSMA PET in selecting candidates for prostate cancer focal therapy","authors":"Kylie Yen-Yi Lim,&nbsp;Mohammad Asghari-Jafarabadi,&nbsp;Arveen A. Kalapara,&nbsp;Julian Smith,&nbsp;Mark Frydenberg,&nbsp;Weranja Ranasinghe","doi":"10.1002/bco2.70264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study aims to evaluate whether prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET improves detection of index lesions and refines patient selection for focal therapy (FT) compared with standard diagnostic pathways.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patients and methods</h3>\n \n <p>We performed a retrospective review of men who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) between 2015 and 2023. Pre-operative assessment included multiparametric MRI, PSMA PET/CT and transperineal prostate biopsy. RP whole-mount histopathology served as the reference standard. Focal therapy eligibility was assessed, and diagnostic performance compared between standard-of-care selection criteria and criteria incorporating PSMA PET.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Sixty patients (26%) met SOC criteria for FT. On final RP histopathology, only 20/60 (33.3%) were truly eligible, with discordance most commonly due to bilateral clinically significant prostate cancer (80%). Incorporation of PSMA PET into the selection model improved specificity for appropriate FT selection from 80.3% to 89.7% and positive predictive value from 33.3% to 46.2%. For detection of outfield disease, addition of PSMA PET increased sensitivity to 75.5% and negative predictive value to 53.5%. Higher SUVmax was significantly associated with FT ineligibility (AUC 0.67), with an optimal cut-point of SUVmax &gt; 4.78 predicting unsuitable candidates.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Only a small proportion of men fulfil criteria for focal therapy, with a high risk of bilateral or contralateral disease using MRI and biopsy alone. PSMA PET improves diagnostic accuracy by identifying outfield lesions and reducing inappropriate FT selection. These findings support integration of PSMA PET to optimise patient selection, with further studies in prospective focal therapy cohorts required.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72420,"journal":{"name":"BJUI compass","volume":"7 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13448158/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJUI compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.70264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This study aims to evaluate whether prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET improves detection of index lesions and refines patient selection for focal therapy (FT) compared with standard diagnostic pathways.

Patients and methods

We performed a retrospective review of men who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) between 2015 and 2023. Pre-operative assessment included multiparametric MRI, PSMA PET/CT and transperineal prostate biopsy. RP whole-mount histopathology served as the reference standard. Focal therapy eligibility was assessed, and diagnostic performance compared between standard-of-care selection criteria and criteria incorporating PSMA PET.

Results

Sixty patients (26%) met SOC criteria for FT. On final RP histopathology, only 20/60 (33.3%) were truly eligible, with discordance most commonly due to bilateral clinically significant prostate cancer (80%). Incorporation of PSMA PET into the selection model improved specificity for appropriate FT selection from 80.3% to 89.7% and positive predictive value from 33.3% to 46.2%. For detection of outfield disease, addition of PSMA PET increased sensitivity to 75.5% and negative predictive value to 53.5%. Higher SUVmax was significantly associated with FT ineligibility (AUC 0.67), with an optimal cut-point of SUVmax > 4.78 predicting unsuitable candidates.

Conclusion

Only a small proportion of men fulfil criteria for focal therapy, with a high risk of bilateral or contralateral disease using MRI and biopsy alone. PSMA PET improves diagnostic accuracy by identifying outfield lesions and reducing inappropriate FT selection. These findings support integration of PSMA PET to optimise patient selection, with further studies in prospective focal therapy cohorts required.

PSMA PET在选择前列腺癌局灶治疗候选者中的应用。
目的:本研究旨在评估与标准诊断途径相比,前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA) PET是否能改善指数病变的检测,并改善患者对局灶治疗(FT)的选择。患者和方法:我们对2015年至2023年间接受根治性前列腺切除术(RP)的男性进行了回顾性研究。术前评估包括多参数MRI, PSMA PET/CT和经会阴前列腺活检。RP全载组织病理学作为参考标准。评估局灶性治疗的资格,并比较标准治疗选择标准和纳入PSMA PET的标准的诊断表现。结果:60例患者(26%)符合FT的SOC标准。在最终的RP组织病理学中,只有20/60(33.3%)真正符合标准,其中最常见的不一致是由于双侧临床显著的前列腺癌(80%)。将PSMA PET纳入选择模型可将适当FT选择的特异性从80.3%提高到89.7%,阳性预测值从33.3%提高到46.2%。对于外场疾病的检测,PSMA PET的加入将敏感性提高到75.5%,阴性预测值提高到53.5%。较高的SUVmax与FT不合格显著相关(AUC为0.67),SUVmax的最佳临界值为bbb4.78,预测不合适的候选人。结论:只有一小部分男性符合局灶治疗标准,单独使用MRI和活检时双侧或对侧疾病的风险很高。PSMA PET通过识别外场病变和减少不适当的FT选择来提高诊断准确性。这些发现支持整合PSMA PET以优化患者选择,需要对前瞻性局灶治疗队列进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书