Reproducibility of 3.0 T single-frequency cardiac MR elastography for quantification of left ventricular myocardial stiffness.

IF 1.8
Radiology advances Pub Date : 2026-07-17 eCollection Date: 2026-07-01 DOI:10.1093/radadv/umag032
Jun Wang, Yong Cheng, Yewen Jiang, Zijun Zheng, Zhanglei Li, Zhen Wang, Shutian An, Jun Chen, Kevin J Glaser, Arvin Arani, Yongqiang Yu, Ren Zhao, Xiaohu Li, Md PhD
{"title":"Reproducibility of 3.0 T single-frequency cardiac MR elastography for quantification of left ventricular myocardial stiffness.","authors":"Jun Wang, Yong Cheng, Yewen Jiang, Zijun Zheng, Zhanglei Li, Zhen Wang, Shutian An, Jun Chen, Kevin J Glaser, Arvin Arani, Yongqiang Yu, Ren Zhao, Xiaohu Li, Md PhD","doi":"10.1093/radadv/umag032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) allows the non-invasive quantification of myocardial stiffness, but long-interval reproducibility data at 3.0 T single-frequency 140-Hz remain limited.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the short- and long-interval reproducibility of 3.0 T cardiac MRE for left ventricular (LV) myocardial stiffness across healthy volunteers and patients with conditions associated with elevated myocardial stiffness.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective single-center study included 69 participants: 60 healthy volunteers and 9 with cardiovascular disease (6 with aortic stenosis and 3 with long-standing hypertension). All participants underwent baseline cardiac MRE (scanner: Signa Premier 3.0 T, GE Healthcare, driver: Resoundant), an immediate short-interval rescan (SIR) within 5 minutes, and a long-interval rescan (LIR) after approximately 1 month. Left ventricular myocardial stiffness and octahedral shear strain signal-to-noise ratio were measured independently by 2 readers. Reproducibility was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), within-subject coefficient of variation, standard error of measurement, and smallest detectable change at the 95% confidence (SDC95) level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline LV myocardial stiffness was higher in the disease group than in healthy volunteers, 11.73 ± 1.01 kPa and 7.80 ± 0.70 kPa (mean ± SD; <i>P</i> < .001), respectively. Inter-reader agreement was excellent across all timepoints, with ICCs of 0.970 at baseline (95% CI, 0.953-0.982), 0.966 for SIR (95% CI, 0.945-0.979), and 0.962 for LIR (95% CI, 0.939-0.976). Within-reader scan-rescan reproducibility was also excellent. For Reader 1, stiffness ICC was 0.979 for the SIR (95% CI, 0.966-0.987) and 0.957 for the LIR (95% CI, 0.932-0.973), with SDC95 values of 0.616 kPa (95% CI, 0.528-0.741) and 0.869 kPa (95% CI, 0.744-1.044), respectively. Reader 2 showed excellent reproducibility, with ICCs ≤0.943.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>3D single-frequency 140-Hz cardiac MRE at 3.0 T provides excellent short- and long-interval reproducibility for LV myocardial stiffness quantification. The SDC95 values may help distinguish true longitudinal stiffness changes from measurement variability.</p>","PeriodicalId":519940,"journal":{"name":"Radiology advances","volume":"3 4","pages":"umag032"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13447016/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/radadv/umag032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cardiac magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) allows the non-invasive quantification of myocardial stiffness, but long-interval reproducibility data at 3.0 T single-frequency 140-Hz remain limited.

Purpose: To evaluate the short- and long-interval reproducibility of 3.0 T cardiac MRE for left ventricular (LV) myocardial stiffness across healthy volunteers and patients with conditions associated with elevated myocardial stiffness.

Materials and methods: This prospective single-center study included 69 participants: 60 healthy volunteers and 9 with cardiovascular disease (6 with aortic stenosis and 3 with long-standing hypertension). All participants underwent baseline cardiac MRE (scanner: Signa Premier 3.0 T, GE Healthcare, driver: Resoundant), an immediate short-interval rescan (SIR) within 5 minutes, and a long-interval rescan (LIR) after approximately 1 month. Left ventricular myocardial stiffness and octahedral shear strain signal-to-noise ratio were measured independently by 2 readers. Reproducibility was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), within-subject coefficient of variation, standard error of measurement, and smallest detectable change at the 95% confidence (SDC95) level.

Results: Baseline LV myocardial stiffness was higher in the disease group than in healthy volunteers, 11.73 ± 1.01 kPa and 7.80 ± 0.70 kPa (mean ± SD; P < .001), respectively. Inter-reader agreement was excellent across all timepoints, with ICCs of 0.970 at baseline (95% CI, 0.953-0.982), 0.966 for SIR (95% CI, 0.945-0.979), and 0.962 for LIR (95% CI, 0.939-0.976). Within-reader scan-rescan reproducibility was also excellent. For Reader 1, stiffness ICC was 0.979 for the SIR (95% CI, 0.966-0.987) and 0.957 for the LIR (95% CI, 0.932-0.973), with SDC95 values of 0.616 kPa (95% CI, 0.528-0.741) and 0.869 kPa (95% CI, 0.744-1.044), respectively. Reader 2 showed excellent reproducibility, with ICCs ≤0.943.

Conclusions: 3D single-frequency 140-Hz cardiac MRE at 3.0 T provides excellent short- and long-interval reproducibility for LV myocardial stiffness quantification. The SDC95 values may help distinguish true longitudinal stiffness changes from measurement variability.

3.0 T单频心脏MR弹性成像定量左室心肌硬度的再现性。
背景:心脏磁共振弹性成像(MRE)可以对心肌刚度进行无创量化,但3.0 T单频140-Hz下的长间隔可重复性数据仍然有限。目的:评价3.0 T心脏MRE对健康志愿者和心肌僵硬度升高患者左心室(LV)心肌僵硬度的短、长间期再现性。材料和方法:这项前瞻性单中心研究包括69名参与者:60名健康志愿者和9名心血管疾病患者(6名主动脉狭窄患者和3名长期高血压患者)。所有参与者进行了基线心脏磁共振(扫描仪:Signa Premier 3.0 T, GE Healthcare,驱动器:reoundant),在5分钟内立即进行短间隔重新扫描(SIR),并在大约1个月后进行长间隔重新扫描(LIR)。左室心肌刚度和八面体剪切应变信噪比由2位读者独立测量。使用Bland-Altman分析、类内相关系数(ICCs)、受试者内变异系数、测量标准误差和95%置信度(SDC95)水平下的最小可检测变化来评估再现性。结果:疾病组左室心肌僵硬度基线值高于健康组,分别为11.73±1.01 kPa和7.80±0.70 kPa (mean±SD; P)结论:3.0 T时3D单频140 hz心脏MRE为左室心肌僵硬度定量提供了良好的短、长间隔再现性。SDC95值可以帮助区分真实的纵向刚度变化和测量变异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书