The lifestyle continuum: family physicians' attitudes toward lifestyle medicine and their health-promoting lifestyles.

IF 1.7
Ozden Gökdemir, Halil Pak, Gazmend Bojaj, Miriam Rey Seoane, Marina Jotić Ivanović, Halime Seda Küçükerdem, Olgu Aygün, Maria Bakola, Angharad Kate Woolley
{"title":"The lifestyle continuum: family physicians' attitudes toward lifestyle medicine and their health-promoting lifestyles.","authors":"Ozden Gökdemir, Halil Pak, Gazmend Bojaj, Miriam Rey Seoane, Marina Jotić Ivanović, Halime Seda Küçükerdem, Olgu Aygün, Maria Bakola, Angharad Kate Woolley","doi":"10.1017/S1463423626101558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigates family physicians' attitudes toward lifestyle medicine, focusing on how these attitudes manifest in their health-promoting lifestyles and the moderating role of their healthcare sector attainment. Employing a quantitative, cross-sectional design, multicentric data were collected from 215 family physicians via an online survey accessed through professional networks. Data were collected using a study-specific demographic and healthcare sector information form, a custom questionnaire designed for attitudes toward lifestyle medicine, and The Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II. Findings revealed a positive association between health-promoting lifestyles and attitudes toward lifestyle medicine. The healthcare sector attainment significantly moderated this relationship, with private practice physicians showing a significant link between their health-promoting lifestyles (specifically, personal stress management, health responsibility, physical activity, and nutrition behaviours) and their attitudes toward lifestyle medicine. Conversely, this connection was not statistically significant in the public sector. The findings were discussed within the framework of social and organizational psychology theories and relevant literature. These results suggest that while physicians generally acknowledge lifestyle medicine, its embodiment through personal health behaviours is more pronounced in specific professional contexts. Our study underscores the need for sector-specific strategies to integrate lifestyle medicine more effectively into clinical practice. Policy initiatives should address structural barriers in the public sector that might hinder physicians' personal engagement with health-promoting behaviours, thereby impacting their professional advocacy for lifestyle medicine. Future research should explore the underlying mechanisms within different healthcare sectors and employ longitudinal designs to establish causality, ultimately aiming to enhance physician well-being and advance preventive care across all settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":74493,"journal":{"name":"Primary health care research & development","volume":"27 ","pages":"e87"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13463160/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary health care research & development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423626101558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates family physicians' attitudes toward lifestyle medicine, focusing on how these attitudes manifest in their health-promoting lifestyles and the moderating role of their healthcare sector attainment. Employing a quantitative, cross-sectional design, multicentric data were collected from 215 family physicians via an online survey accessed through professional networks. Data were collected using a study-specific demographic and healthcare sector information form, a custom questionnaire designed for attitudes toward lifestyle medicine, and The Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II. Findings revealed a positive association between health-promoting lifestyles and attitudes toward lifestyle medicine. The healthcare sector attainment significantly moderated this relationship, with private practice physicians showing a significant link between their health-promoting lifestyles (specifically, personal stress management, health responsibility, physical activity, and nutrition behaviours) and their attitudes toward lifestyle medicine. Conversely, this connection was not statistically significant in the public sector. The findings were discussed within the framework of social and organizational psychology theories and relevant literature. These results suggest that while physicians generally acknowledge lifestyle medicine, its embodiment through personal health behaviours is more pronounced in specific professional contexts. Our study underscores the need for sector-specific strategies to integrate lifestyle medicine more effectively into clinical practice. Policy initiatives should address structural barriers in the public sector that might hinder physicians' personal engagement with health-promoting behaviours, thereby impacting their professional advocacy for lifestyle medicine. Future research should explore the underlying mechanisms within different healthcare sectors and employ longitudinal designs to establish causality, ultimately aiming to enhance physician well-being and advance preventive care across all settings.

生活方式统一体:家庭医生对生活方式医学的态度及其促进健康的生活方式。
本研究调查了家庭医生对生活方式医学的态度,重点探讨了这些态度如何体现在他们的健康促进生活方式中,以及他们的医疗保健部门成就的调节作用。采用定量、横断面设计,通过专业网络访问的在线调查收集了215名家庭医生的多中心数据。数据的收集使用了特定研究的人口统计和卫生保健部门信息表、针对生活方式医学态度设计的定制问卷和促进健康的生活方式概况II。研究结果显示,促进健康的生活方式与对生活方式医学的态度呈正相关。医疗保健部门的成就显著地缓和了这一关系,私人执业医生显示,他们促进健康的生活方式(特别是个人压力管理、健康责任、体育活动和营养行为)与他们对生活方式医学的态度之间存在显著联系。相反,在公共部门,这种联系在统计上并不显著。研究结果在社会与组织心理学理论和相关文献的框架内进行了讨论。这些结果表明,虽然医生普遍承认生活方式医学,但在特定的专业背景下,其通过个人健康行为的体现更为明显。我们的研究强调需要制定针对特定行业的策略,将生活方式医学更有效地融入临床实践。政策举措应解决公共部门的结构性障碍,这些障碍可能阻碍医生个人参与促进健康的行为,从而影响他们对生活方式医学的专业宣传。未来的研究应该探索不同医疗保健部门的潜在机制,并采用纵向设计来确定因果关系,最终旨在提高医生的幸福感,并在所有环境中推进预防保健。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书