Completeness and timeliness of records of SARS due to COVID-19 in the SIVEP-Gripe System, Brazil 2020-2023.

IF 2
Taina Barbie do Espírito Santo, Alexandra Crispim Boing
{"title":"Completeness and timeliness of records of SARS due to COVID-19 in the SIVEP-Gripe System, Brazil 2020-2023.","authors":"Taina Barbie do Espírito Santo, Alexandra Crispim Boing","doi":"10.1590/1980-549720260034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the completeness and timeliness of records of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) due to COVID-19 in the SIVEP-Gripe system in Brazil, from 2020 to 2023.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a descriptive study based on secondary, public, and anonymized data from SIVEP-Gripe, comprising 2,200,796 SARS due to Covid-19 records. Sixty-six sociodemographic, clinical, hospitalization, outcome, and treatment variables were analyzed. Completeness was classified according to Romero and Cunha (2006). Timeliness was assessed through the intervals between symptom onset and notification, notification and data entry, and notification and case closure, considering historical surveillance parameters (7, 30, and 60 days, respectively).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a predominance of variables classified as having very poor completeness throughout the analyzed period, despite a slight improvement in the good and excellent completeness classifications between 2020 and 2023. Regional heterogeneity was observed; Amapá, Mato Grosso do Sul, Santa Catarina, and Paraná achieved higher proportions of satisfactory completion, whereas Tocantins, Pernambuco, Mato Grosso, Rondônia, and Alagoas had the worst performance. Between 2020 and 2023, the average notification time decreased from 13 to 7 days. Data entry was performed on time in over 90% of records in most states, while case closure remained around 86%. Nevertheless, the 90% target for timely notification was not achieved.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite improvements in the timeliness of records, completeness remained unsatisfactory and uneven across states. These findings highlight the need to strengthen data entry practices and invest in continuous training and systematic monitoring to ensure more consistent data for surveillance and public health planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":74697,"journal":{"name":"Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology","volume":"29 ","pages":"e260034"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13427215/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-549720260034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the completeness and timeliness of records of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) due to COVID-19 in the SIVEP-Gripe system in Brazil, from 2020 to 2023.

Methods: This was a descriptive study based on secondary, public, and anonymized data from SIVEP-Gripe, comprising 2,200,796 SARS due to Covid-19 records. Sixty-six sociodemographic, clinical, hospitalization, outcome, and treatment variables were analyzed. Completeness was classified according to Romero and Cunha (2006). Timeliness was assessed through the intervals between symptom onset and notification, notification and data entry, and notification and case closure, considering historical surveillance parameters (7, 30, and 60 days, respectively).

Results: There was a predominance of variables classified as having very poor completeness throughout the analyzed period, despite a slight improvement in the good and excellent completeness classifications between 2020 and 2023. Regional heterogeneity was observed; Amapá, Mato Grosso do Sul, Santa Catarina, and Paraná achieved higher proportions of satisfactory completion, whereas Tocantins, Pernambuco, Mato Grosso, Rondônia, and Alagoas had the worst performance. Between 2020 and 2023, the average notification time decreased from 13 to 7 days. Data entry was performed on time in over 90% of records in most states, while case closure remained around 86%. Nevertheless, the 90% target for timely notification was not achieved.

Conclusion: Despite improvements in the timeliness of records, completeness remained unsatisfactory and uneven across states. These findings highlight the need to strengthen data entry practices and invest in continuous training and systematic monitoring to ensure more consistent data for surveillance and public health planning.

巴西2020-2023年SIVEP-Gripe系统中因COVID-19引起的SARS记录的完整性和及时性
目的:评价2020 - 2023年巴西SIVEP-Gripe系统中COVID-19所致严重急性呼吸综合征(SARS)病例记录的完整性和及时性。方法:这是一项描述性研究,基于SIVEP-Gripe的二手、公开和匿名数据,包括2,200,796例因Covid-19引起的SARS记录。分析了66个社会人口学、临床、住院、结局和治疗变量。根据Romero和Cunha(2006)对完整性进行分类。考虑历史监测参数(分别为7、30和60天),通过症状出现和通报之间、通报和数据输入之间以及通报和病例关闭之间的时间间隔来评估及时性。结果:在整个分析期间,尽管在2020年至2023年期间,良好和优秀的完整性分类略有改善,但被分类为非常差的变量占主导地位。区域异质性显著;阿马apap、南马托格罗索州、圣卡塔琳娜州和帕拉纳州的完成率较高,而托坎廷斯州、伯南布哥州、马托格罗索州、Rondônia和阿拉戈斯州的完成率最差。从2020年到2023年,平均通报时间从13天减少到7天。在大多数州,超过90%的记录按时完成了数据输入,而案件结案率保持在86%左右。然而,90%的及时通报目标没有实现。结论:尽管记录的及时性有所改善,但完整性仍然令人不满意,各州之间也不均衡。这些调查结果突出表明,需要加强数据输入做法,并投资于持续培训和系统监测,以确保监测和公共卫生规划的数据更加一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书