A Comparative Analysis of a Perceptual Hearing Loss Assessment Dataset and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Core Sets for Hearing Loss.

IF 2.3 0 REHABILITATION
Advances in rehabilitation science and practice Pub Date : 2026-08-05 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/27536351261471149
Tahereh Afghah, Kirsten C Wagener
{"title":"A Comparative Analysis of a Perceptual Hearing Loss Assessment Dataset and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Core Sets for Hearing Loss.","authors":"Tahereh Afghah, Kirsten C Wagener","doi":"10.1177/27536351261471149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Common hearing assessments often overlook key aspects of hearing loss and its impact on daily-life. This study evaluates a broad dataset of audiological and functional measures by applying the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) Core Sets for Hearing Loss. The aim is to clarify which aspects of hearing loss-related functioning are represented in the dataset and which aspects are not addressed, thereby supporting appropriate interpretation and use of the data in clinical and research contexts.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The dataset includes results from otoscopy, pure-tone audiometry, a self-reported hearing and functioning questionnaire (HEAR-COMMAND Tool), speech intelligibility tests (Göttinger Sentence Test, GöSA and Oldenburger Sentence Test, OLSA), listening effort evaluation (Adaptive Categorical Listening Effort Scaling, ACALES), loudness perception assessments (Loudness Validation Method and Adaptive Categorical Loudness Scaling), a multi-talker conversation task (Concurrent Oldenburger Sentence Test, CCOLSA), coupler measurements, in-situ recordings, tone-in-noise perception, and the Dialogue Picture Task (DIAPIX). Using the ICF linking rules, all measures, performed on 76 participants, were systematically mapped to ICF categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the brief CSHL, the dataset addressed 92.5% of the categories, missing only brain and inner ear structures. For the comprehensive CSHL, the dataset addressed 50.4% of the categories. This included 81.8% of Body Functions, 40% of Body Structures, 59.5% of Activities and Participation, and 29.1% of Environmental Factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results demonstrate that the dataset captures many key aspects of hearing loss and its consequences while also clarifying which areas of functioning are not addressed. By applying the ICF framework as a standardized reference, this study provides guidance for the transparent interpretation and appropriate use of the dataset in clinical and research settings, while enabling the creation of detailed profiles of an individual's hearing loss that are relevant for modeling speech intelligibility and listening effort.</p>","PeriodicalId":72107,"journal":{"name":"Advances in rehabilitation science and practice","volume":"15 ","pages":"27536351261471149"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13443246/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in rehabilitation science and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536351261471149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"0","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Common hearing assessments often overlook key aspects of hearing loss and its impact on daily-life. This study evaluates a broad dataset of audiological and functional measures by applying the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) Core Sets for Hearing Loss. The aim is to clarify which aspects of hearing loss-related functioning are represented in the dataset and which aspects are not addressed, thereby supporting appropriate interpretation and use of the data in clinical and research contexts.

Design: The dataset includes results from otoscopy, pure-tone audiometry, a self-reported hearing and functioning questionnaire (HEAR-COMMAND Tool), speech intelligibility tests (Göttinger Sentence Test, GöSA and Oldenburger Sentence Test, OLSA), listening effort evaluation (Adaptive Categorical Listening Effort Scaling, ACALES), loudness perception assessments (Loudness Validation Method and Adaptive Categorical Loudness Scaling), a multi-talker conversation task (Concurrent Oldenburger Sentence Test, CCOLSA), coupler measurements, in-situ recordings, tone-in-noise perception, and the Dialogue Picture Task (DIAPIX). Using the ICF linking rules, all measures, performed on 76 participants, were systematically mapped to ICF categories.

Results: For the brief CSHL, the dataset addressed 92.5% of the categories, missing only brain and inner ear structures. For the comprehensive CSHL, the dataset addressed 50.4% of the categories. This included 81.8% of Body Functions, 40% of Body Structures, 59.5% of Activities and Participation, and 29.1% of Environmental Factors.

Conclusion: The results demonstrate that the dataset captures many key aspects of hearing loss and its consequences while also clarifying which areas of functioning are not addressed. By applying the ICF framework as a standardized reference, this study provides guidance for the transparent interpretation and appropriate use of the dataset in clinical and research settings, while enabling the creation of detailed profiles of an individual's hearing loss that are relevant for modeling speech intelligibility and listening effort.

感性听力损失评估数据集与国际听力损失功能、残疾和健康核心集分类的比较分析。
目的:常见的听力评估往往忽略了听力损失的关键方面及其对日常生活的影响。本研究通过应用世界卫生组织的国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)听力损失核心集来评估听力学和功能测量的广泛数据集。目的是澄清听力损失相关功能的哪些方面在数据集中得到了体现,哪些方面没有得到解决,从而支持在临床和研究背景下对数据的适当解释和使用。设计:数据集包括耳镜检查、纯音听力测量、自我报告的听力和功能问卷(听力命令工具)、语音清晰度测试(Göttinger句子测试,GöSA和Oldenburger句子测试,OLSA)、听力努力评估(自适应分类听力努力量表,ACALES)、响度感知评估(响度验证方法和自适应分类响度量表)、多说话者对话任务(并发Oldenburger句子测试,OLSA)。CCOLSA),耦合器测量,原位记录,噪声中音调感知和对话图像任务(DIAPIX)。使用ICF链接规则,对76名参与者执行的所有措施都被系统地映射到ICF类别。结果:对于简短的CSHL,该数据集处理了92.5%的类别,仅缺少大脑和内耳结构。对于综合CSHL,该数据集处理了50.4%的类别。这包括81.8%的身体功能,40%的身体结构,59.5%的活动和参与,以及29.1%的环境因素。结论:结果表明,该数据集捕获了听力损失及其后果的许多关键方面,同时也澄清了哪些功能领域没有得到解决。通过应用ICF框架作为标准化参考,本研究为临床和研究环境中数据集的透明解释和适当使用提供了指导,同时能够创建与建模语音可理解性和听力努力相关的个人听力损失的详细概况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书