Psychometric validity and clinical utility of the GHQ-12 for screening psychological health in isolated, confined and unusual or extreme environments.

African Journal of Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2026-07-24 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.4102/ajopa.v8i0.195
Charles H van Wijk, Chris J B Muller
{"title":"Psychometric validity and clinical utility of the GHQ-12 for screening psychological health in isolated, confined and unusual or extreme environments.","authors":"Charles H van Wijk, Chris J B Muller","doi":"10.4102/ajopa.v8i0.195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated the psychometric validity and clinical utility of the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in isolated, confined and unusual or extreme (ICUE) work environments in South Africa. Two occupational health surveillance cohorts (<i>N</i> = 730 and <i>N</i> = 128) representing diverse occupational fields completed the GHQ-12 together with validated measures of common mental disorders, psychological resilience, emotional wellbeing and mental toughness. Confirmatory factor analyses supported a bifactor model comprising a strong general factor with minimal unique variance attributable to the positive and negative item subfactors. Internal consistency was high across samples. The GHQ-12 total scores correlated positively with depression, anxiety and adjustment disorder symptoms, and negatively with psychological resilience, emotional wellbeing and mental toughness, supporting convergent validity. Test-retest reliability was moderately strong, with a minority showing marked deterioration of mental health under more stressful operational conditions, indicating the tool's potential sensitivity to environmental stressors. The GHQ-12 total scores differentiated between individuals with and without common mental disorders, and receiver operating characteristic analyses indicated acceptable sensitivity and specificity at optimal thresholds. Introducing a 'grey-zone' approach with lower and upper thresholds enhanced its practical application for surveillance and triage, by improving risk identification and decision-making for occupational health practitioners.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>This study provides the first large-scale evaluation of the GHQ-12 in ICUE occupational environments in southern Africa. By combining psychometric evaluation with a clinically oriented grey-zone approach, it offers evidence to support how brief mental health tools can be applied to high-risk workplaces such as offshore vessels, submarines and polar research stations.</p>","PeriodicalId":34043,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Psychological Assessment","volume":"8 ","pages":"195"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13444004/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Psychological Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/ajopa.v8i0.195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluated the psychometric validity and clinical utility of the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in isolated, confined and unusual or extreme (ICUE) work environments in South Africa. Two occupational health surveillance cohorts (N = 730 and N = 128) representing diverse occupational fields completed the GHQ-12 together with validated measures of common mental disorders, psychological resilience, emotional wellbeing and mental toughness. Confirmatory factor analyses supported a bifactor model comprising a strong general factor with minimal unique variance attributable to the positive and negative item subfactors. Internal consistency was high across samples. The GHQ-12 total scores correlated positively with depression, anxiety and adjustment disorder symptoms, and negatively with psychological resilience, emotional wellbeing and mental toughness, supporting convergent validity. Test-retest reliability was moderately strong, with a minority showing marked deterioration of mental health under more stressful operational conditions, indicating the tool's potential sensitivity to environmental stressors. The GHQ-12 total scores differentiated between individuals with and without common mental disorders, and receiver operating characteristic analyses indicated acceptable sensitivity and specificity at optimal thresholds. Introducing a 'grey-zone' approach with lower and upper thresholds enhanced its practical application for surveillance and triage, by improving risk identification and decision-making for occupational health practitioners.

Contribution: This study provides the first large-scale evaluation of the GHQ-12 in ICUE occupational environments in southern Africa. By combining psychometric evaluation with a clinically oriented grey-zone approach, it offers evidence to support how brief mental health tools can be applied to high-risk workplaces such as offshore vessels, submarines and polar research stations.

GHQ-12在孤立、禁闭和不寻常或极端环境中筛查心理健康的心理测量效度和临床应用。
本研究评估了12项一般健康问卷(GHQ-12)在南非孤立、受限和不寻常或极端(ICUE)工作环境中的心理测量效度和临床效用。代表不同职业领域的两个职业健康监测队列(N = 730和N = 128)完成了GHQ-12以及常见精神障碍、心理弹性、情绪健康和精神韧性的有效测量。验证性因子分析支持一个双因子模型,该模型包括一个强大的一般因子,具有可归因于正面和负面项目子因子的最小唯一方差。样品之间的内部一致性很高。GHQ-12总分与抑郁、焦虑、适应障碍症状呈正相关,与心理弹性、情绪健康、心理韧性呈负相关,支持收敛效度。测试-重测信度中等,少数人在更有压力的操作条件下表现出明显的心理健康恶化,这表明该工具对环境压力源的潜在敏感性。GHQ-12总分在有和没有常见精神障碍的个体之间存在差异,受试者操作特征分析显示,在最佳阈值下,灵敏度和特异性都是可以接受的。引入具有下限和上限的“灰色地带”方法,通过改进职业卫生从业人员的风险识别和决策,加强了其在监测和分类方面的实际应用。贡献:本研究首次对南部非洲ICUE职业环境中的GHQ-12进行了大规模评估。通过将心理测量评估与临床导向的灰色地带方法相结合,它提供了证据,支持如何将简短的心理健康工具应用于近海船只、潜艇和极地研究站等高风险工作场所。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书