Cost-effectiveness of community-based interventions for type 2 diabetes management in Indonesia: a time-horizon sensitivity analysis.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Aalbrecht A Irawan, Nursanti Anggriani, Yudhie Andriyana, Rizky Abdulah
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness of community-based interventions for type 2 diabetes management in Indonesia: a time-horizon sensitivity analysis.","authors":"Aalbrecht A Irawan, Nursanti Anggriani, Yudhie Andriyana, Rizky Abdulah","doi":"10.1186/s12962-026-00812-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) imposes a severe economic burden on Indonesia's Social Health Insurance Administration Body (BPJS Kesehatan), driven predominantly by expensive late-stage complications. While the Prolanis program offers community-based prevention, a lack of long-term economic forecasting hinders optimal resource allocation among its core interventions. To address this gap, this study aims to evaluate community-based intervention strategies to determine which approach is the most cost-effective for long-term T2DM management in Indonesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a deterministic linear compartmental state-transition model to forecast the 25-year epidemiological and economic impacts of six intervention strategies derived from three Prolanis pillars: health education, physical activity, and lifestyle modification. The model integrated an economic resource allocation framework, Indonesian epidemiology data, and a 3.8-fold complication cost penalty multiplier for complication states. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated from a healthcare payer perspective using the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) and Time-Horizon Sensitivity Analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 25 years, the Lifestyle Modification intervention emerged as the dominant strategy compared to baseline care. It generated the highest increase in the managed T2DM population while incurring the lowest total systemic cost. ICER analyses demonstrated that Lifestyle Modification strictly dominated individual and combined promotive activities, which were subject to severe budgetary restrictions due to their high delivery cost-weights. Furthermore, temporal analysis confirmed that Lifestyle Modification achieves systemic net savings rapidly by Year 5. By Year 25, it resulted in projected cumulative net savings of 19.22 trillion IDR under the 3% base-case discount rate, with sensitivity analyses confirming robust dominance across 0% (27.61 trillion IDR savings) and 5% (15.48 trillion IDR savings) discount rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lifestyle Modification is the most economically dominant community-based intervention for managing T2DM in Indonesia. To avert the financial penalties of downstream complications, policymakers should strategically rebalance the Prolanis capitation budget to prioritize proactive, monitoring-driven lifestyle interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47054,"journal":{"name":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13450512/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-026-00812-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) imposes a severe economic burden on Indonesia's Social Health Insurance Administration Body (BPJS Kesehatan), driven predominantly by expensive late-stage complications. While the Prolanis program offers community-based prevention, a lack of long-term economic forecasting hinders optimal resource allocation among its core interventions. To address this gap, this study aims to evaluate community-based intervention strategies to determine which approach is the most cost-effective for long-term T2DM management in Indonesia.

Methods: We developed a deterministic linear compartmental state-transition model to forecast the 25-year epidemiological and economic impacts of six intervention strategies derived from three Prolanis pillars: health education, physical activity, and lifestyle modification. The model integrated an economic resource allocation framework, Indonesian epidemiology data, and a 3.8-fold complication cost penalty multiplier for complication states. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated from a healthcare payer perspective using the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) and Time-Horizon Sensitivity Analysis.

Results: Over 25 years, the Lifestyle Modification intervention emerged as the dominant strategy compared to baseline care. It generated the highest increase in the managed T2DM population while incurring the lowest total systemic cost. ICER analyses demonstrated that Lifestyle Modification strictly dominated individual and combined promotive activities, which were subject to severe budgetary restrictions due to their high delivery cost-weights. Furthermore, temporal analysis confirmed that Lifestyle Modification achieves systemic net savings rapidly by Year 5. By Year 25, it resulted in projected cumulative net savings of 19.22 trillion IDR under the 3% base-case discount rate, with sensitivity analyses confirming robust dominance across 0% (27.61 trillion IDR savings) and 5% (15.48 trillion IDR savings) discount rates.

Conclusion: Lifestyle Modification is the most economically dominant community-based intervention for managing T2DM in Indonesia. To avert the financial penalties of downstream complications, policymakers should strategically rebalance the Prolanis capitation budget to prioritize proactive, monitoring-driven lifestyle interventions.

印度尼西亚2型糖尿病管理社区干预措施的成本效益:时间范围敏感性分析
背景:2型糖尿病(T2DM)给印尼社会健康保险管理机构(BPJS Kesehatan)带来了严重的经济负担,主要是由昂贵的晚期并发症造成的。虽然Prolanis项目提供以社区为基础的预防,但缺乏长期经济预测阻碍了其核心干预措施的最佳资源分配。为了解决这一差距,本研究旨在评估基于社区的干预策略,以确定哪种方法对印度尼西亚的长期T2DM管理最具成本效益。方法:我们建立了一个确定性的线性区隔状态过渡模型来预测来自Prolanis三个支柱的六种干预策略的25年流行病学和经济影响:健康教育、体育活动和生活方式改变。该模型综合了经济资源分配框架、印度尼西亚流行病学数据和3.8倍的并发症成本惩罚乘数。从医疗保健支付者的角度,使用增量成本效益比(ICER)和时间范围敏感性分析来评估成本效益。结果:25年来,与基线护理相比,生活方式改变干预成为主要策略。它在管理T2DM人群中产生了最高的增长,而产生了最低的总系统成本。ICER的分析表明,“改变生活方式”在个人和联合推广活动中占绝对主导地位,这些活动由于其高交付成本权重而受到严格的预算限制。此外,时间分析证实,生活方式改变在第5年迅速实现系统净储蓄。到第25年,在3%的基本折现率下,预计累计净节省19.22万亿印尼盾,敏感性分析证实了0%(27.61万亿印尼盾)和5%(15.48万亿印尼盾)折现率的强劲优势。结论:生活方式改变是印尼管理T2DM最经济的社区干预措施。为了避免下游并发症带来的经济损失,政策制定者应该战略性地重新平衡Prolanis的资本预算,优先考虑主动的、监测驱动的生活方式干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
59
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of cost-effectiveness analysis, including conceptual or methodological work, economic evaluations, and policy analysis related to resource allocation at a national or international level. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation is aimed at health economists, health services researchers, and policy-makers with an interest in enhancing the flow and transfer of knowledge relating to efficiency in the health sector. Manuscripts are encouraged from researchers based in low- and middle-income countries, with a view to increasing the international economic evidence base for health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书