Åsa Anger, Leida Kaaman, Rebecka Mac, Johan Holmberg, Nitya Jayaram-Lindström, Tobias Lundgren, Maria Hagströmer, Carl Johan Sundberg, Lina Martinsson, Sigrid Salomonsson
{"title":"Braining, structured physical activity in specialized psychiatry for patients with substance use disorders-a feasibility study.","authors":"Åsa Anger, Leida Kaaman, Rebecka Mac, Johan Holmberg, Nitya Jayaram-Lindström, Tobias Lundgren, Maria Hagströmer, Carl Johan Sundberg, Lina Martinsson, Sigrid Salomonsson","doi":"10.1186/s40814-026-01898-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals with substance use disorders (SUD) have poor metabolic and cardiovascular health and a high prevalence of depression and anxiety symptoms. Regular physical activity can improve both somatic and mental health. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of an aerobic physical activity intervention (Braining) in psychiatric care services specialized in SUD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this uncontrolled open trial with pre-, post-, and 12-month follow-up measures, 22 patients with SUD participated in a 12-week physical activity intervention. Recommended participation was three 30-45-min moderate-to-vigorous interval-based exercise sessions per week combining aerobic and body-weight strength exercises. No minimum session attendance was required for study participation. Feasibility was assessed through recruitment yield, number of exercise sessions attended, and adherence to study procedures. Satisfaction, acceptability, credibility, and negative effects were assessed using self-report questionnaires and adverse event reporting. Physical activity was measured using accelerometry (ActiGraph GT3X) and self-report. Patient-centered outcomes were summarized descriptively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean number of attended exercise sessions was 9 (SD = 7.7). Adherence to ActiGraph measurements was 73% at baseline, 46% mid-intervention, and 32% post-intervention. Completion of self-report assessments was 100% at baseline, 86% post-intervention, and 77% at 12-month follow-up. The mean Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) score was 27 (SD = 3.9), and no serious adverse events were reported. Descriptive trends suggested reductions in psychiatric symptoms and substance use and improvements in functional status and quality of life, whereas changes in somatic measures were limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Acceptability of the intervention was high in the target patient population; however, exercise attendance was low. Participants engaged adequately in study procedures, but adherence to accelerometer-based measurements was low. With further methodological refinements to enhance patient engagement and adaptations to how physical activity is measured in vulnerable patient populations, Braining remains a relevant intervention and warrants systematic evaluation in future large-scale controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>The study was registered on 25/12/2021 at ClinicalTrials.gov under ID NCT05186688.</p>","PeriodicalId":20176,"journal":{"name":"Pilot and Feasibility Studies","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13445667/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pilot and Feasibility Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-026-01898-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Individuals with substance use disorders (SUD) have poor metabolic and cardiovascular health and a high prevalence of depression and anxiety symptoms. Regular physical activity can improve both somatic and mental health. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of an aerobic physical activity intervention (Braining) in psychiatric care services specialized in SUD.
Methods: In this uncontrolled open trial with pre-, post-, and 12-month follow-up measures, 22 patients with SUD participated in a 12-week physical activity intervention. Recommended participation was three 30-45-min moderate-to-vigorous interval-based exercise sessions per week combining aerobic and body-weight strength exercises. No minimum session attendance was required for study participation. Feasibility was assessed through recruitment yield, number of exercise sessions attended, and adherence to study procedures. Satisfaction, acceptability, credibility, and negative effects were assessed using self-report questionnaires and adverse event reporting. Physical activity was measured using accelerometry (ActiGraph GT3X) and self-report. Patient-centered outcomes were summarized descriptively.
Results: The mean number of attended exercise sessions was 9 (SD = 7.7). Adherence to ActiGraph measurements was 73% at baseline, 46% mid-intervention, and 32% post-intervention. Completion of self-report assessments was 100% at baseline, 86% post-intervention, and 77% at 12-month follow-up. The mean Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) score was 27 (SD = 3.9), and no serious adverse events were reported. Descriptive trends suggested reductions in psychiatric symptoms and substance use and improvements in functional status and quality of life, whereas changes in somatic measures were limited.
Conclusions: Acceptability of the intervention was high in the target patient population; however, exercise attendance was low. Participants engaged adequately in study procedures, but adherence to accelerometer-based measurements was low. With further methodological refinements to enhance patient engagement and adaptations to how physical activity is measured in vulnerable patient populations, Braining remains a relevant intervention and warrants systematic evaluation in future large-scale controlled trials.
Study registration: The study was registered on 25/12/2021 at ClinicalTrials.gov under ID NCT05186688.
期刊介绍:
Pilot and Feasibility Studies encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of pilot and feasibility studies in biomedicine. The journal publishes research articles that are intended to directly influence future clinical trials or large scale observational studies, as well as protocols, commentaries and methodology articles. The journal also ensures that the results of all well-conducted, peer-reviewed, pilot and feasibility studies are published, regardless of outcome or significance of findings. Pilot and feasibility studies are increasingly conducted prior to a full randomized controlled trial. However, these studies often lack clear objectives, many remain unpublished, and there is confusion over the meanings of the words “pilot” and “feasibility”. Pilot and Feasibility Studies provides a forum for discussion around this key aspect of the scientific process, and seeks to ensure that these studies are published, so as to complete the publication thread for clinical research.