Braining, structured physical activity in specialized psychiatry for patients with substance use disorders-a feasibility study.

IF 2.1 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Åsa Anger, Leida Kaaman, Rebecka Mac, Johan Holmberg, Nitya Jayaram-Lindström, Tobias Lundgren, Maria Hagströmer, Carl Johan Sundberg, Lina Martinsson, Sigrid Salomonsson
{"title":"Braining, structured physical activity in specialized psychiatry for patients with substance use disorders-a feasibility study.","authors":"Åsa Anger, Leida Kaaman, Rebecka Mac, Johan Holmberg, Nitya Jayaram-Lindström, Tobias Lundgren, Maria Hagströmer, Carl Johan Sundberg, Lina Martinsson, Sigrid Salomonsson","doi":"10.1186/s40814-026-01898-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals with substance use disorders (SUD) have poor metabolic and cardiovascular health and a high prevalence of depression and anxiety symptoms. Regular physical activity can improve both somatic and mental health. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of an aerobic physical activity intervention (Braining) in psychiatric care services specialized in SUD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this uncontrolled open trial with pre-, post-, and 12-month follow-up measures, 22 patients with SUD participated in a 12-week physical activity intervention. Recommended participation was three 30-45-min moderate-to-vigorous interval-based exercise sessions per week combining aerobic and body-weight strength exercises. No minimum session attendance was required for study participation. Feasibility was assessed through recruitment yield, number of exercise sessions attended, and adherence to study procedures. Satisfaction, acceptability, credibility, and negative effects were assessed using self-report questionnaires and adverse event reporting. Physical activity was measured using accelerometry (ActiGraph GT3X) and self-report. Patient-centered outcomes were summarized descriptively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean number of attended exercise sessions was 9 (SD = 7.7). Adherence to ActiGraph measurements was 73% at baseline, 46% mid-intervention, and 32% post-intervention. Completion of self-report assessments was 100% at baseline, 86% post-intervention, and 77% at 12-month follow-up. The mean Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) score was 27 (SD = 3.9), and no serious adverse events were reported. Descriptive trends suggested reductions in psychiatric symptoms and substance use and improvements in functional status and quality of life, whereas changes in somatic measures were limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Acceptability of the intervention was high in the target patient population; however, exercise attendance was low. Participants engaged adequately in study procedures, but adherence to accelerometer-based measurements was low. With further methodological refinements to enhance patient engagement and adaptations to how physical activity is measured in vulnerable patient populations, Braining remains a relevant intervention and warrants systematic evaluation in future large-scale controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>The study was registered on 25/12/2021 at ClinicalTrials.gov under ID NCT05186688.</p>","PeriodicalId":20176,"journal":{"name":"Pilot and Feasibility Studies","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13445667/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pilot and Feasibility Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-026-01898-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Individuals with substance use disorders (SUD) have poor metabolic and cardiovascular health and a high prevalence of depression and anxiety symptoms. Regular physical activity can improve both somatic and mental health. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of an aerobic physical activity intervention (Braining) in psychiatric care services specialized in SUD.

Methods: In this uncontrolled open trial with pre-, post-, and 12-month follow-up measures, 22 patients with SUD participated in a 12-week physical activity intervention. Recommended participation was three 30-45-min moderate-to-vigorous interval-based exercise sessions per week combining aerobic and body-weight strength exercises. No minimum session attendance was required for study participation. Feasibility was assessed through recruitment yield, number of exercise sessions attended, and adherence to study procedures. Satisfaction, acceptability, credibility, and negative effects were assessed using self-report questionnaires and adverse event reporting. Physical activity was measured using accelerometry (ActiGraph GT3X) and self-report. Patient-centered outcomes were summarized descriptively.

Results: The mean number of attended exercise sessions was 9 (SD = 7.7). Adherence to ActiGraph measurements was 73% at baseline, 46% mid-intervention, and 32% post-intervention. Completion of self-report assessments was 100% at baseline, 86% post-intervention, and 77% at 12-month follow-up. The mean Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) score was 27 (SD = 3.9), and no serious adverse events were reported. Descriptive trends suggested reductions in psychiatric symptoms and substance use and improvements in functional status and quality of life, whereas changes in somatic measures were limited.

Conclusions: Acceptability of the intervention was high in the target patient population; however, exercise attendance was low. Participants engaged adequately in study procedures, but adherence to accelerometer-based measurements was low. With further methodological refinements to enhance patient engagement and adaptations to how physical activity is measured in vulnerable patient populations, Braining remains a relevant intervention and warrants systematic evaluation in future large-scale controlled trials.

Study registration: The study was registered on 25/12/2021 at ClinicalTrials.gov under ID NCT05186688.

大脑,物质使用障碍患者的专业精神病学中有组织的身体活动-可行性研究。
背景:物质使用障碍(SUD)患者的代谢和心血管健康状况较差,抑郁和焦虑症状的患病率较高。有规律的体育活动可以改善身体和心理健康。本研究旨在评估有氧体育活动干预(脑训练)在专门治疗SUD的精神科护理服务中的可行性。方法:在这项不受控制的开放试验中,22例SUD患者参加了为期12周的身体活动干预,包括术前、术后和12个月的随访。建议每周参加三次30-45分钟的中等到高强度间歇运动,结合有氧和体重力量锻炼。参与研究没有最低出勤率的要求。通过招募率、参加的锻炼次数和对研究程序的依从性来评估可行性。满意度、可接受性、可信度和负面影响通过自我报告问卷和不良事件报告进行评估。采用加速度计(ActiGraph GT3X)和自我报告测量身体活动。以患者为中心的结果进行描述性总结。结果:平均参加锻炼次数为9次(SD = 7.7)。基线时坚持使用ActiGraph测量的比例为73%,干预中期为46%,干预后为32%。基线时自我报告评估的完成率为100%,干预后为86%,12个月随访时为77%。患者满意度问卷(CSQ-8)平均得分为27分(SD = 3.9),无严重不良事件发生。描述性趋势表明,精神症状和药物使用减少,功能状态和生活质量改善,而躯体测量的变化有限。结论:该干预措施在目标人群中可接受性较高;然而,锻炼出勤率很低。参与者充分参与了研究程序,但对基于加速度计的测量的依从性较低。随着方法学的进一步完善,以提高患者的参与度和适应如何在弱势患者群体中测量身体活动,大脑训练仍然是一种相关的干预措施,值得在未来的大规模对照试验中进行系统评估。研究注册:该研究于2021年12月25日在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,ID为NCT05186688。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Pilot and Feasibility Studies Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
241
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Pilot and Feasibility Studies encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of pilot and feasibility studies in biomedicine. The journal publishes research articles that are intended to directly influence future clinical trials or large scale observational studies, as well as protocols, commentaries and methodology articles. The journal also ensures that the results of all well-conducted, peer-reviewed, pilot and feasibility studies are published, regardless of outcome or significance of findings. Pilot and feasibility studies are increasingly conducted prior to a full randomized controlled trial. However, these studies often lack clear objectives, many remain unpublished, and there is confusion over the meanings of the words “pilot” and “feasibility”. Pilot and Feasibility Studies provides a forum for discussion around this key aspect of the scientific process, and seeks to ensure that these studies are published, so as to complete the publication thread for clinical research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书