Early prediction of intensive care unit-acquired weakness using quadriceps ultrasound and routine clinical variables: development and temporal validation of a prospective multicentre machine-learning model.

IF 7.5 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Tongjuan Zou, Xuehua Chen, Jun Li, Xianying Lei, Hengyu Cai, Li Zhang, Li Zhang, Xueying Zeng, Qionglan Dong, Shurong Zhang, Yan Kang, Bo Wang, Zhongwei Zhang, Xiaodong Jin, Wanhong Yin
{"title":"Early prediction of intensive care unit-acquired weakness using quadriceps ultrasound and routine clinical variables: development and temporal validation of a prospective multicentre machine-learning model.","authors":"Tongjuan Zou, Xuehua Chen, Jun Li, Xianying Lei, Hengyu Cai, Li Zhang, Li Zhang, Xueying Zeng, Qionglan Dong, Shurong Zhang, Yan Kang, Bo Wang, Zhongwei Zhang, Xiaodong Jin, Wanhong Yin","doi":"10.1186/s40560-026-00919-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICUAW) is frequent in critically ill adults and is associated with adverse outcomes, but early recognition is difficult because standard diagnosis relies on volitional strength testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective multicentre cohort study across 16 tertiary ICUs in southwest China, adults expected to remain in the ICU for ≥ 3 days underwent quadriceps ultrasound and routine clinical assessment within 24 h of admission. ICUAW was defined by the first evaluable Medical Research Council (MRC) score during ICU stay. We developed and compared nine algorithms in a development cohort (n = 858) and performed temporal external validation in a later cohort (n = 345).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ICUAW occurred in 579/858 (67.5%) patients in the development cohort and 181/345 (52.5%) in the validation cohort. In external validation, a random forest model integrating unpressurised ultrasound and clinical features achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.810 (95% CI 0.765-0.855), with sensitivity 0.983 (0.952-0.997) and specificity 0.726 (0.651-0.792). The corresponding pressurised-ultrasound model showed lower discrimination (AUC 0.730 [0.676-0.783]) and specificity (0.506 [0.427-0.585]). Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) highlighted quadriceps muscle thickness, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, albumin, and inflammatory markers as key contributors. In additional incremental-value analyses using the General RF model as the reference, the unpressurised RF model improved risk reclassification and discrimination (cf-NRI 0.490, 95% CI 0.277-0.698; IDI 0.072, 95% CI 0.045-0.099), whereas the pressurised RF model showed a smaller cf-NRI improvement (0.231, 95% CI 0.011-0.463) with less consistent IDI improvement (0.019, 95% CI - 0.002 to 0.040).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This early ultrasound-clinical model may identify patients at high risk of ICUAW before strength testing becomes feasible and support earlier targeting of preventive and rehabilitation strategies. Trial registration Registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300075581) on September 8, 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":16123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13445787/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-026-00919-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICUAW) is frequent in critically ill adults and is associated with adverse outcomes, but early recognition is difficult because standard diagnosis relies on volitional strength testing.

Methods: In this prospective multicentre cohort study across 16 tertiary ICUs in southwest China, adults expected to remain in the ICU for ≥ 3 days underwent quadriceps ultrasound and routine clinical assessment within 24 h of admission. ICUAW was defined by the first evaluable Medical Research Council (MRC) score during ICU stay. We developed and compared nine algorithms in a development cohort (n = 858) and performed temporal external validation in a later cohort (n = 345).

Results: ICUAW occurred in 579/858 (67.5%) patients in the development cohort and 181/345 (52.5%) in the validation cohort. In external validation, a random forest model integrating unpressurised ultrasound and clinical features achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.810 (95% CI 0.765-0.855), with sensitivity 0.983 (0.952-0.997) and specificity 0.726 (0.651-0.792). The corresponding pressurised-ultrasound model showed lower discrimination (AUC 0.730 [0.676-0.783]) and specificity (0.506 [0.427-0.585]). Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) highlighted quadriceps muscle thickness, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, albumin, and inflammatory markers as key contributors. In additional incremental-value analyses using the General RF model as the reference, the unpressurised RF model improved risk reclassification and discrimination (cf-NRI 0.490, 95% CI 0.277-0.698; IDI 0.072, 95% CI 0.045-0.099), whereas the pressurised RF model showed a smaller cf-NRI improvement (0.231, 95% CI 0.011-0.463) with less consistent IDI improvement (0.019, 95% CI - 0.002 to 0.040).

Conclusions: This early ultrasound-clinical model may identify patients at high risk of ICUAW before strength testing becomes feasible and support earlier targeting of preventive and rehabilitation strategies. Trial registration Registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300075581) on September 8, 2023.

使用股四头肌超声和常规临床变量早期预测重症监护病房获得性虚弱:前瞻性多中心机器学习模型的开发和时间验证。
背景:重症监护病房获得性虚弱(ICUAW)常见于危重成人,并与不良后果相关,但早期识别困难,因为标准诊断依赖于意志力量测试。方法:在中国西南地区16个三级ICU的前瞻性多中心队列研究中,预计在ICU停留≥3天的成人在入院24小时内接受股四头肌超声检查和常规临床评估。ICUAW是由ICU住院期间第一个可评估的医学研究委员会(MRC)评分来定义的。我们在一个开发队列(n = 858)中开发并比较了9种算法,并在随后的队列(n = 345)中进行了时间外部验证。结果:在开发队列中,579/858例(67.5%)患者发生ICUAW,在验证队列中,181/345例(52.5%)患者发生ICUAW。在外部验证中,整合无压力超声和临床特征的随机森林模型的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)为0.810 (95% CI 0.765-0.855),灵敏度0.983(0.952-0.997),特异性0.726(0.651-0.792)。相应的加压超声模型具有较低的鉴别能力(AUC为0.730[0.676-0.783])和特异性(0.506[0.427-0.585])。Shapley加性解释(SHAP)强调股四头肌厚度、顺序器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分、白蛋白和炎症标志物是关键因素。在使用通用RF模型作为参考的附加增量值分析中,未加压RF模型改善了风险重新分类和区分(cf-NRI 0.490, 95% CI 0.277-0.698; IDI 0.072, 95% CI 0.045-0.099),而加压RF模型显示出较小的cf-NRI改善(0.231,95% CI 0.011-0.463), IDI改善不太一致(0.019,95% CI - 0.002 - 0.040)。结论:这种早期超声临床模型可以在强度测试变得可行之前识别出ICUAW的高风险患者,并支持早期针对性的预防和康复策略。试验注册于2023年9月8日在中国临床试验注册中心注册(ChiCTR2300075581)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
1.40%
发文量
51
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: "Journal of Intensive Care" is an open access journal dedicated to the comprehensive coverage of intensive care medicine, providing a platform for the latest research and clinical insights in this critical field. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including intensive and critical care, trauma and surgical intensive care, pediatric intensive care, acute and emergency medicine, perioperative medicine, resuscitation, infection control, and organ dysfunction. Recognizing the importance of cultural diversity in healthcare practices, "Journal of Intensive Care" also encourages submissions that explore and discuss the cultural aspects of intensive care, aiming to promote a more inclusive and culturally sensitive approach to patient care. By fostering a global exchange of knowledge and expertise, the journal contributes to the continuous improvement of intensive care practices worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书