The Effect of Chlorhexidine Mouthwash, With or Without Alcohol, on Plaque and Gingivitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Bregje W M van Swaaij, Maud Joosstens, G A Fridus Van der Weijden, Liselet de Vries, Dagmar Else Slot
{"title":"The Effect of Chlorhexidine Mouthwash, With or Without Alcohol, on Plaque and Gingivitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Bregje W M van Swaaij, Maud Joosstens, G A Fridus Van der Weijden, Liselet de Vries, Dagmar Else Slot","doi":"10.1111/idh.70139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study systematically assessed the available literature on the effect of a chlorhexidine mouthwash without alcohol (CHXalc-) compared to a chlorhexidine mouthwash with alcohol (CHXalc+) on plaque and parameters of gingivitis. Side effects and user appreciation were secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>MEDLINE-PubMed and Cochrane-CENTRAL databases were searched up to January 2025 to identify eligible studies. Studies evaluating the effect of CHXalc- compared to CHXalc+ were included. A descriptive analysis and, when feasible, a meta-analysis were performed. The risk of bias was assessed, and the body of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After screening, 17 papers met the inclusion criteria and were included. A descriptive analysis demonstrated that most studies showed no differences in plaque, bleeding, and gingivitis scores between CHXalc- and CHXalc+. In non-brushing studies, the overall meta-analysis of plaque scores showed a significant difference in favour of CHXalc+ on end (SMD = 0.49; 95% CI [0.03; 0.95], p = 0.04) and incremental difference scores (SMD = 0.82; 95% CI [0.40; 1.24], p = 0.0001). For brushing studies, the overall meta-analysis showed no significant differences in plaque scores. Further meta-analyses of bleeding and gingival index scores showed, in majority, no significant differences between CHXalc- and CHXalc+. Tooth surface discoloration scores also did not differ. Taste preference was divided, with half of the comparisons with outcomes in favour of CHXalc- and the other half showing no difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When a CHX-mouthwash is used in non-brushing situations, there is weak evidence that CHXalc- provided a reduced effect regarding plaque control than CHXalc+. In brushing situations, there is weak evidence for no difference between CHXalc- and CHXalc+ in terms of plaque control. Regarding parameters of gingival inflammation and side effects, there is weak to moderate evidence indicating no difference between CHXalc- and CHXalc+. Regarding user perception of taste, no clear preference emerged from the eligible papers.</p>","PeriodicalId":13791,"journal":{"name":"International journal of dental hygiene","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of dental hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/idh.70139","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study systematically assessed the available literature on the effect of a chlorhexidine mouthwash without alcohol (CHXalc-) compared to a chlorhexidine mouthwash with alcohol (CHXalc+) on plaque and parameters of gingivitis. Side effects and user appreciation were secondary outcomes.

Materials and methods: MEDLINE-PubMed and Cochrane-CENTRAL databases were searched up to January 2025 to identify eligible studies. Studies evaluating the effect of CHXalc- compared to CHXalc+ were included. A descriptive analysis and, when feasible, a meta-analysis were performed. The risk of bias was assessed, and the body of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach.

Results: After screening, 17 papers met the inclusion criteria and were included. A descriptive analysis demonstrated that most studies showed no differences in plaque, bleeding, and gingivitis scores between CHXalc- and CHXalc+. In non-brushing studies, the overall meta-analysis of plaque scores showed a significant difference in favour of CHXalc+ on end (SMD = 0.49; 95% CI [0.03; 0.95], p = 0.04) and incremental difference scores (SMD = 0.82; 95% CI [0.40; 1.24], p = 0.0001). For brushing studies, the overall meta-analysis showed no significant differences in plaque scores. Further meta-analyses of bleeding and gingival index scores showed, in majority, no significant differences between CHXalc- and CHXalc+. Tooth surface discoloration scores also did not differ. Taste preference was divided, with half of the comparisons with outcomes in favour of CHXalc- and the other half showing no difference.

Conclusion: When a CHX-mouthwash is used in non-brushing situations, there is weak evidence that CHXalc- provided a reduced effect regarding plaque control than CHXalc+. In brushing situations, there is weak evidence for no difference between CHXalc- and CHXalc+ in terms of plaque control. Regarding parameters of gingival inflammation and side effects, there is weak to moderate evidence indicating no difference between CHXalc- and CHXalc+. Regarding user perception of taste, no clear preference emerged from the eligible papers.

含或不含酒精氯己定漱口水对牙菌斑和牙龈炎的影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的:本研究系统地评估了无酒精氯己定漱口水(CHXalc-)与含酒精氯己定漱口水(CHXalc+)对牙菌斑和牙龈炎参数的影响。副作用和用户评价是次要结果。材料和方法:检索截至2025年1月的MEDLINE-PubMed和Cochrane-CENTRAL数据库,以确定符合条件的研究。研究评价了CHXalc-与CHXalc+的效果。进行描述性分析,可行时进行meta分析。评估偏倚风险,并使用GRADE方法对证据体进行评估。结果:经筛选,符合纳入标准的文献17篇。一项描述性分析表明,大多数研究显示CHXalc-和CHXalc+在牙菌斑、出血和牙龈炎评分方面没有差异。在非刷牙研究中,斑块评分的整体荟萃分析显示,CHXalc+在终点(SMD = 0.49, 95% CI [0.03; 0.95], p = 0.04)和增量差异评分(SMD = 0.82, 95% CI [0.40; 1.24], p = 0.0001)方面存在显著差异。对于刷牙研究,总体荟萃分析显示斑块评分没有显著差异。进一步的出血和牙龈指数评分荟萃分析显示,CHXalc-和CHXalc+在大多数情况下没有显著差异。牙齿表面变色评分也没有差异。味觉偏好被分成两组,其中一半的比较结果偏向CHXalc,而另一半则没有差异。结论:当chx漱口水在不刷牙的情况下使用时,有微弱的证据表明CHXalc-对牙菌斑的控制效果比CHXalc+要低。在刷牙的情况下,没有证据表明CHXalc-和CHXalc+在菌斑控制方面没有差异。关于牙龈炎症和副作用的参数,CHXalc-和CHXalc+没有弱到中等的证据表明差异。关于用户对味道的感知,从合格的论文中没有出现明确的偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International journal of dental hygiene
International journal of dental hygiene DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Dental Hygiene is the official scientific peer-reviewed journal of the International Federation of Dental Hygienists (IFDH). The journal brings the latest scientific news, high quality commissioned reviews as well as clinical, professional and educational developmental and legislative news to the profession world-wide. Thus, it acts as a forum for exchange of relevant information and enhancement of the profession with the purpose of promoting oral health for patients and communities. The aim of the International Journal of Dental Hygiene is to provide a forum for exchange of scientific knowledge in the field of oral health and dental hygiene. A further aim is to support and facilitate the application of new knowledge into clinical practice. The journal welcomes original research, reviews and case reports as well as clinical, professional, educational and legislative news to the profession world-wide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书