Pain response after palliative-intent radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Kenji Makita, Yuichi Hiroshima, Keiichi Takehana, Tetsuo Saito, Naoki Nakamura, Takeo Takahashi, Yoshiyuki Shioyama
{"title":"Pain response after palliative-intent radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review.","authors":"Kenji Makita, Yuichi Hiroshima, Keiichi Takehana, Tetsuo Saito, Naoki Nakamura, Takeo Takahashi, Yoshiyuki Shioyama","doi":"10.1007/s10147-026-03163-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To date, no review has specifically focused on palliative-intent radiotherapy (RT) for pancreatic cancer (PC)-related pain. This study aimed to evaluate the pain response after palliative-intent RT for PC-related pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Ichushi-Web, and the Cochrane Library for studies published between 1971 and 2024. Studies in which palliative-intent RT was administered for PC-related pain were included. Extracted Data were independently assessed by three reviewers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 629 studies identified through the database search, 11 met the inclusion criteria. The most frequently used palliative-intent RT schedules were 30 Gy in 10 fractions for conventional RT and 25 Gy in a single fraction for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). In addition, 8 Gy once weekly (24 Gy in 3 fractions) RT has also been reported. Because the methods used for pain assessment varied across the included studies, a meta-analysis was considered inappropriate. Pain associated with PC improved following palliative-intent conventional RT (pain response rate, 69-94%), palliative-intent SBRT (pain response rate, 53-90%), and 8 Gy once weekly RT (pain response rate, 80%). A few grade ≥ 3 gastrointestinal adverse events were reported (< 10%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Palliative-intent RT appears to be a promising approach for alleviating PC-related pain. However, the current evidence is heterogeneous in terms of target selection and dose-fractionations. Further studies, including randomized controlled trials, may help identify optimal treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"2150-2157"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-026-03163-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To date, no review has specifically focused on palliative-intent radiotherapy (RT) for pancreatic cancer (PC)-related pain. This study aimed to evaluate the pain response after palliative-intent RT for PC-related pain.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Ichushi-Web, and the Cochrane Library for studies published between 1971 and 2024. Studies in which palliative-intent RT was administered for PC-related pain were included. Extracted Data were independently assessed by three reviewers.

Results: Of the 629 studies identified through the database search, 11 met the inclusion criteria. The most frequently used palliative-intent RT schedules were 30 Gy in 10 fractions for conventional RT and 25 Gy in a single fraction for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). In addition, 8 Gy once weekly (24 Gy in 3 fractions) RT has also been reported. Because the methods used for pain assessment varied across the included studies, a meta-analysis was considered inappropriate. Pain associated with PC improved following palliative-intent conventional RT (pain response rate, 69-94%), palliative-intent SBRT (pain response rate, 53-90%), and 8 Gy once weekly RT (pain response rate, 80%). A few grade ≥ 3 gastrointestinal adverse events were reported (< 10%).

Conclusion: Palliative-intent RT appears to be a promising approach for alleviating PC-related pain. However, the current evidence is heterogeneous in terms of target selection and dose-fractionations. Further studies, including randomized controlled trials, may help identify optimal treatment strategies.

胰腺癌姑息性放射治疗后的疼痛反应:一项系统综述。
背景:到目前为止,还没有专门针对姑息性放疗(RT)治疗胰腺癌(PC)相关疼痛的综述。本研究旨在评估姑息性放射治疗pc相关疼痛后的疼痛反应。方法:综合检索PubMed、Ichushi-Web和Cochrane图书馆1971 - 2024年间发表的研究。在这些研究中,姑息性RT治疗与pc相关的疼痛。提取的数据由三位评论者独立评估。结果:通过数据库检索确定的629项研究中,有11项符合纳入标准。最常用的姑息性放射治疗方案为常规放射治疗30 Gy / 10次,立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT) 25 Gy / 1次。此外,每周8 Gy 1次(3次24 Gy)的RT也有报道。由于所纳入的研究中用于疼痛评估的方法各不相同,因此荟萃分析被认为是不合适的。在缓解意图常规RT(疼痛缓解率,69-94%)、缓解意图SBRT(疼痛缓解率,53-90%)和每周8 Gy 1次RT(疼痛缓解率,80%)后,PC相关疼痛得到改善。报告了一些≥3级胃肠道不良事件(结论:姑息性RT似乎是缓解pc相关疼痛的一种有希望的方法。然而,目前的证据在靶点选择和剂量分级方面是不一致的。进一步的研究,包括随机对照试验,可能有助于确定最佳治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Oncology (IJCO) welcomes original research papers on all aspects of clinical oncology that report the results of novel and timely investigations. Reports on clinical trials are encouraged. Experimental studies will also be accepted if they have obvious relevance to clinical oncology. Membership in the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology is not a prerequisite for submission to the journal. Papers are received on the understanding that: their contents have not been published in whole or in part elsewhere; that they are subject to peer review by at least two referees and the Editors, and to editorial revision of the language and contents; and that the Editors are responsible for their acceptance, rejection, and order of publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书