Accuracy of iliac crest reference pin placement in total hip arthroplasty: a CT-based analysis of risk factors for cortical perforation

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Yasutaka Masada, Tomonori Tetsunaga, Kazuki Yamada, Tomohiro Inoue, Ryuichiro Okuda, Tomoko Tetsunaga, Yuki Okazaki, Toshifumi Ozaki
{"title":"Accuracy of iliac crest reference pin placement in total hip arthroplasty: a CT-based analysis of risk factors for cortical perforation","authors":"Yasutaka Masada,&nbsp;Tomonori Tetsunaga,&nbsp;Kazuki Yamada,&nbsp;Tomohiro Inoue,&nbsp;Ryuichiro Okuda,&nbsp;Tomoko Tetsunaga,&nbsp;Yuki Okazaki,&nbsp;Toshifumi Ozaki","doi":"10.1007/s00402-026-06464-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Accurate iliac crest reference pin placement is essential for safe navigation-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA). Although complications are uncommon, inaccurate placement may cause neurovascular injury. This study aimed to evaluate pin insertion accuracy using postoperative computed tomography (CT), identify risk factors for cortical perforation, and determine whether CT-detected cortical perforation was associated with postoperative acetabular cup positioning accuracy.</p><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We retrospectively analyzed 200 primary THAs performed using portable or CT-based navigation between December 2022 and July 2025. Pin position was assessed on CT 1 week postoperatively and classified as complete intraosseous insertion or cortical perforation. Risk factors were examined using univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Perforation direction was evaluated using Firth’s penalized logistic regression. Postoperative cup positioning accuracy was assessed using CT-based radiographic inclination (RI), radiographic anteversion (RA), and absolute errors from target angles of 40° for RI and 15° for RA.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Cortical perforation occurred in 70 of 200 hips (35.0%): 32 medial and 38 lateral. On a pin-by-pin basis, 113 of 400 pins (28.3%) demonstrated perforation. In multivariable analysis, smaller ASIS width, lateral decubitus positioning, and 4-mm pin use independently predicted cortical perforation. Medial perforation was independently associated with lateral decubitus positioning, 4-mm pin use, and smaller iliac wing angle in Firth’s model. RI, RA, absolute RI error, and absolute RA error did not differ significantly between the intraosseous and cortical perforation groups. All hips in both groups were within 10° of the target angles for both RI and RA. No dislocation or revision surgery occurred in either group.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>CT-detected cortical perforation of iliac crest reference pins was common but was rarely accompanied by clinically apparent complications and was not associated with inferior postoperative cup positioning accuracy. Perforation risk was influenced by insertion position, platform-associated instrumentation, and pelvic morphology. These findings should be interpreted primarily as a technical accuracy endpoint rather than as evidence of clinically proven harm. The clinical significance of CT-detected cortical perforation remains uncertain, and particular attention should be paid to minimizing medial cortical breach.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"146 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13447472/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-026-06464-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Accurate iliac crest reference pin placement is essential for safe navigation-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA). Although complications are uncommon, inaccurate placement may cause neurovascular injury. This study aimed to evaluate pin insertion accuracy using postoperative computed tomography (CT), identify risk factors for cortical perforation, and determine whether CT-detected cortical perforation was associated with postoperative acetabular cup positioning accuracy.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively analyzed 200 primary THAs performed using portable or CT-based navigation between December 2022 and July 2025. Pin position was assessed on CT 1 week postoperatively and classified as complete intraosseous insertion or cortical perforation. Risk factors were examined using univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Perforation direction was evaluated using Firth’s penalized logistic regression. Postoperative cup positioning accuracy was assessed using CT-based radiographic inclination (RI), radiographic anteversion (RA), and absolute errors from target angles of 40° for RI and 15° for RA.

Results

Cortical perforation occurred in 70 of 200 hips (35.0%): 32 medial and 38 lateral. On a pin-by-pin basis, 113 of 400 pins (28.3%) demonstrated perforation. In multivariable analysis, smaller ASIS width, lateral decubitus positioning, and 4-mm pin use independently predicted cortical perforation. Medial perforation was independently associated with lateral decubitus positioning, 4-mm pin use, and smaller iliac wing angle in Firth’s model. RI, RA, absolute RI error, and absolute RA error did not differ significantly between the intraosseous and cortical perforation groups. All hips in both groups were within 10° of the target angles for both RI and RA. No dislocation or revision surgery occurred in either group.

Conclusions

CT-detected cortical perforation of iliac crest reference pins was common but was rarely accompanied by clinically apparent complications and was not associated with inferior postoperative cup positioning accuracy. Perforation risk was influenced by insertion position, platform-associated instrumentation, and pelvic morphology. These findings should be interpreted primarily as a technical accuracy endpoint rather than as evidence of clinically proven harm. The clinical significance of CT-detected cortical perforation remains uncertain, and particular attention should be paid to minimizing medial cortical breach.

全髋关节置换术中髂骨参考针放置的准确性:一项基于ct的皮质穿孔危险因素分析。
导读:准确的髂骨参考钉放置是安全导航辅助全髋关节置换术(THA)的必要条件。虽然并发症不常见,但不准确的放置可能导致神经血管损伤。本研究旨在通过术后CT评估针插入准确性,确定皮质穿孔的危险因素,并确定CT检测的皮质穿孔是否与术后髋臼杯定位准确性相关。材料和方法:我们回顾性分析了2022年12月至2025年7月期间使用便携式或基于ct的导航进行的200例原发性tha。术后1周在CT上评估针的位置,并分类为完全骨内插入或皮质穿孔。使用单变量和多变量logistic回归分析检查危险因素。使用Firth的惩罚逻辑回归评估射孔方向。术后杯子定位精度评估采用基于ct的放射倾斜(RI)、放射前倾(RA)和靶角绝对误差(RI为40°,RA为15°)。结果:皮质穿孔70例(35.0%),内侧32例,外侧38例。在针接针的基础上,400个针中有113个(28.3%)显示穿孔。在多变量分析中,较小的ASIS宽度、侧卧位和4mm针的使用独立预测皮质穿孔。在Firth的模型中,内侧穿孔与侧卧位、使用4mm针和较小的髂翼角独立相关。RI、RA、绝对RI误差和绝对RA误差在骨内穿孔组和皮质穿孔组之间无显著差异。两组的髋部均在RI和RA的目标角度10°以内。两组均未发生脱位或翻修手术。结论:ct检测到的髂嵴参考钉皮质穿孔是常见的,但很少伴有临床明显的并发症,且与术后杯定位精度较低无关。穿孔风险受插入位置、平台相关内固定和骨盆形态的影响。这些发现应该主要被解释为技术上的准确性终点,而不是临床证明有害的证据。ct检测皮质穿孔的临床意义仍不确定,应特别注意尽量减少内侧皮质破裂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
424
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance. "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书