Oscar Gonzalo, Juan Luis Sánchez-González, Alba Sánchez-Gil, Lorena Carrascal-Laso, María Isidoro-García, Javier Martín-Vallejo, Jesus Perez
{"title":"Evidence-based interventions for vocational recovery in first-episode psychosis: A meta-analysis of employment and education rates.","authors":"Oscar Gonzalo, Juan Luis Sánchez-González, Alba Sánchez-Gil, Lorena Carrascal-Laso, María Isidoro-García, Javier Martín-Vallejo, Jesus Perez","doi":"10.1177/00048674261471316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Young people with first-episode psychosis experience high rates of disruption in work and education and consistently describe vocational participation as a core priority of recovery. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of evidence-based interventions in improving employment and education rates after a first-episode psychosis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A PROSPERO-registered meta-analysis was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Three endpoints were analysed: (a) employment, (b) education, and (c) combined vocational rates. Both meta-analyses of proportions and comparative meta-analyses (intervention vs control) were performed under random-effects models. Risk of bias (RoB2), Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies - of Exposure and certainty of evidence Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one studies (<i>n</i> = 8651) were included. Vocational interventions - particularly Individual Placement and Support (odds ratio = 2.86, 95% CI 1.81-4.54) - were consistently associated with improved competitive employment compared with control conditions (odds ratio = 2.35, 95% CI 1.88-2.94). No intervention showed a consistent advantage for education rates (odds ratio = 1.19, 95% CI 0.80-1.76). The combined endpoint showed substantial heterogeneity (<i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 69.6%, <i>τ</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.296, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and possible publication bias, limiting interpretability (odds ratio = 2.02, 95% CI 1.29-3.17).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings support integrating structured, evidence-based vocational support - particularly Individual Placement and Support - as a routine component of services for early psychosis, specifically for patients with employment goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":8589,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"1022-1036"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00048674261471316","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Young people with first-episode psychosis experience high rates of disruption in work and education and consistently describe vocational participation as a core priority of recovery. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of evidence-based interventions in improving employment and education rates after a first-episode psychosis.
Method: A PROSPERO-registered meta-analysis was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Three endpoints were analysed: (a) employment, (b) education, and (c) combined vocational rates. Both meta-analyses of proportions and comparative meta-analyses (intervention vs control) were performed under random-effects models. Risk of bias (RoB2), Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies - of Exposure and certainty of evidence Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation were assessed.
Results: Thirty-one studies (n = 8651) were included. Vocational interventions - particularly Individual Placement and Support (odds ratio = 2.86, 95% CI 1.81-4.54) - were consistently associated with improved competitive employment compared with control conditions (odds ratio = 2.35, 95% CI 1.88-2.94). No intervention showed a consistent advantage for education rates (odds ratio = 1.19, 95% CI 0.80-1.76). The combined endpoint showed substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 69.6%, τ2 = 0.296, p < 0.001) and possible publication bias, limiting interpretability (odds ratio = 2.02, 95% CI 1.29-3.17).
Conclusions: Our findings support integrating structured, evidence-based vocational support - particularly Individual Placement and Support - as a routine component of services for early psychosis, specifically for patients with employment goals.
背景:患有首发精神病的年轻人在工作和教育方面的中断率很高,并且始终将职业参与描述为康复的核心优先事项。本荟萃分析旨在评估循证干预在改善首发精神病患者就业和受教育率方面的有效性。方法:按照系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行普洛斯佩罗注册的荟萃分析。分析了三个终点:(a)就业,(b)教育和(c)综合职业率。比例荟萃分析和比较荟萃分析(干预与对照)均在随机效应模型下进行。评估了偏倚风险(RoB2)、非随机研究中的偏倚风险-暴露和证据确定性的分级、评估、发展和评价。结果:纳入31项研究(n = 8651)。与对照条件相比,职业干预——特别是个人安置和支持(优势比= 2.86,95% CI 1.81-4.54)——始终与改善竞争性就业相关(优势比= 2.35,95% CI 1.88-2.94)。没有干预显示出受教育率的持续优势(优势比= 1.19,95% CI 0.80-1.76)。结论:我们的研究结果支持将结构化的、基于证据的职业支持,特别是个体安置和支持,作为早期精神病服务的常规组成部分,特别是对有就业目标的患者。
期刊介绍:
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry is the official Journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP).
The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry is a monthly journal publishing original articles which describe research or report opinions of interest to psychiatrists. These contributions may be presented as original research, reviews, perspectives, commentaries and letters to the editor.
The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry is the leading psychiatry journal of the Asia-Pacific region.