Augmented Reality for Anatomy Training: Efficacy and Interest Among Medical Trainees.

Journal of medical extended reality Pub Date : 2024-10-18 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1089/jmxr.2024.0006
Matthew K Mitchell, Alexander W Burns, Sohail Mohammed, Eleni Balasalle, Blaire K Rikard, Samir Ghandour, Laura Avery, Min Lang, Raul Uppot
{"title":"Augmented Reality for Anatomy Training: Efficacy and Interest Among Medical Trainees.","authors":"Matthew K Mitchell, Alexander W Burns, Sohail Mohammed, Eleni Balasalle, Blaire K Rikard, Samir Ghandour, Laura Avery, Min Lang, Raul Uppot","doi":"10.1089/jmxr.2024.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Augmented reality (AR) technology has steadily advanced since its inception, resulting in serious discussion of its utility in various fields, including medical education and training. In an attempt to address these questions, we conducted a prospective study at a U.S. medical school using an AR-based anatomy education software. Medical students in their preclinical years were invited to participate in the prospective study. Participants completed a presurvey that characterized familiarity with and interest in AR. Volunteers then engaged with three modules within the AR-based anatomy education software. After finishing the modules, participants completed a postsurvey regarding their experiences with and perceptions about AR. This study identified that less than half of medical students surveyed felt familiar with AR technology and its potential role within medical education prior to study exposure. A statistically significant difference was demonstrated between students' perceptions toward the use of AR in medical education prior to guided use when compared to students' perceptions after study exposure (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Users' sentiments, as gauged by postsurvey free responses, were largely in favor of AR as a supplement to existing wet lab dissections rather than as an outright replacement. This study demonstrated a potential use case for AR technology in the supplementation of traditional medical education methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":517437,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical extended reality","volume":"1 1","pages":"191-201"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13390691/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medical extended reality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jmxr.2024.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Augmented reality (AR) technology has steadily advanced since its inception, resulting in serious discussion of its utility in various fields, including medical education and training. In an attempt to address these questions, we conducted a prospective study at a U.S. medical school using an AR-based anatomy education software. Medical students in their preclinical years were invited to participate in the prospective study. Participants completed a presurvey that characterized familiarity with and interest in AR. Volunteers then engaged with three modules within the AR-based anatomy education software. After finishing the modules, participants completed a postsurvey regarding their experiences with and perceptions about AR. This study identified that less than half of medical students surveyed felt familiar with AR technology and its potential role within medical education prior to study exposure. A statistically significant difference was demonstrated between students' perceptions toward the use of AR in medical education prior to guided use when compared to students' perceptions after study exposure (p < 0.001). Users' sentiments, as gauged by postsurvey free responses, were largely in favor of AR as a supplement to existing wet lab dissections rather than as an outright replacement. This study demonstrated a potential use case for AR technology in the supplementation of traditional medical education methods.

增强现实解剖学训练:医疗学员的功效和兴趣。
增强现实(AR)技术自诞生以来稳步发展,导致其在包括医学教育和培训在内的各个领域的实用性的认真讨论。为了解决这些问题,我们在美国一所医学院使用基于ar的解剖学教育软件进行了一项前瞻性研究。在他们的临床前年的医学生被邀请参加前瞻性研究。参与者完成了对AR的熟悉程度和兴趣的调查。志愿者随后参与了基于AR的解剖学教育软件中的三个模块。在完成这些模块后,参与者完成了一项关于他们对AR的经历和看法的后调查。这项研究发现,在接受调查的医学生中,不到一半的人在接受研究之前熟悉AR技术及其在医学教育中的潜在作用。与学生接触研究后的认知相比,学生在指导使用前对医学教育中AR使用的认知存在统计学显著差异(p < 0.001)。根据调查后的自由反馈,用户的情绪在很大程度上支持AR作为现有湿式实验室解剖的补充,而不是完全替代。本研究展示了增强现实技术在补充传统医学教育方法方面的潜在用例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书