James S Cho, Devaunsh M Thaker, Rohan Jotwani, David Hao
{"title":"Extended Reality for Neuraxial Procedures: A Scoping Review.","authors":"James S Cho, Devaunsh M Thaker, Rohan Jotwani, David Hao","doi":"10.1089/jmxr.2024.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extended reality (XR) technology, encompassing augmented reality, mixed reality, and virtual reality, has the potential to enhance the teaching and performance of neuraxial procedures. The diverse applications of XR include immersive simulations and novel modes of procedural navigation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This scoping review aims to explore the varied applications of XR for neuraxial procedures while suggesting directions for future research.</p><p><strong>Evidence review: </strong>A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar until December 2023. Additional sources were identified via citation searching of relevant articles. The findings are reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 42 studies, including three pending clinical trials were included. Most included studies were published after 2015. XR technology was applied in diverse ways for simulation (<i>n</i> = 24), navigation (<i>n</i> = 17), and teleconsultation (<i>n</i> = 1), but only five of the completed studies described use in direct patient care. For the display of visuals, computer screens were most commonly used, followed by head-mounted devices, laser projectors, and semi-transparent mirrors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Interest in using XR technology for neuraxial procedures is growing. Preliminary work shows promise for this technology in both education and clinical practice, but achieving accurate image registration without disrupting existing workflows remains an ongoing barrier to clinical testing. Additional research is needed to assess the cost-effectiveness and reliability of this technology.</p>","PeriodicalId":517437,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical extended reality","volume":"1 1","pages":"112-123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13387235/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medical extended reality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jmxr.2024.0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Extended reality (XR) technology, encompassing augmented reality, mixed reality, and virtual reality, has the potential to enhance the teaching and performance of neuraxial procedures. The diverse applications of XR include immersive simulations and novel modes of procedural navigation.
Objectives: This scoping review aims to explore the varied applications of XR for neuraxial procedures while suggesting directions for future research.
Evidence review: A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar until December 2023. Additional sources were identified via citation searching of relevant articles. The findings are reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).
Findings: A total of 42 studies, including three pending clinical trials were included. Most included studies were published after 2015. XR technology was applied in diverse ways for simulation (n = 24), navigation (n = 17), and teleconsultation (n = 1), but only five of the completed studies described use in direct patient care. For the display of visuals, computer screens were most commonly used, followed by head-mounted devices, laser projectors, and semi-transparent mirrors.
Conclusions: Interest in using XR technology for neuraxial procedures is growing. Preliminary work shows promise for this technology in both education and clinical practice, but achieving accurate image registration without disrupting existing workflows remains an ongoing barrier to clinical testing. Additional research is needed to assess the cost-effectiveness and reliability of this technology.
背景:扩展现实(XR)技术,包括增强现实、混合现实和虚拟现实,有可能增强神经轴向手术的教学和表现。XR的各种应用包括沉浸式模拟和程序导航的新模式。目的:本综述旨在探讨XR在轴突手术中的各种应用,并为未来的研究提出方向。证据回顾:在PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials和谷歌Scholar上进行了系统检索,直到2023年12月。通过相关文章的引文搜索确定了其他来源。研究结果使用系统评价和荟萃分析扩展范围评价的首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)进行报告。结果:共纳入42项研究,包括3项正在进行的临床试验。大多数纳入的研究发表于2015年之后。XR技术以多种方式应用于模拟(n = 24)、导航(n = 17)和远程会诊(n = 1),但完成的研究中只有5项描述了在直接患者护理中的应用。在视觉显示方面,最常用的是电脑屏幕,其次是头戴式设备、激光投影仪和半透明镜子。结论:对使用XR技术进行轴突手术的兴趣正在增长。初步的工作显示了该技术在教育和临床实践中的前景,但在不破坏现有工作流程的情况下实现准确的图像配准仍然是临床测试的一个持续障碍。需要进一步的研究来评估这项技术的成本效益和可靠性。