CellDuality: Unlocking Biological Reasoning in LLMs with Self-Supervised RLVR.

Yuhang Chen, Zhen Tan, Ruichen Zhang, Mufan Qiu, Tianlong Chen
{"title":"CellDuality: Unlocking Biological Reasoning in LLMs with Self-Supervised RLVR.","authors":"Yuhang Chen, Zhen Tan, Ruichen Zhang, Mufan Qiu, Tianlong Chen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Developing generalist large language models (LLMs) capable of complex biological reasoning is a central challenge in computational biology. While existing LLMs excel at predictive tasks like cell type annotation and logically-constrained problems, enabling open-ended and mechanistic reasoning remains a challenge. A promising direction is Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Rewards (RLVR), which has been shown to significantly enhance complex reasoning in general domains like mathematics and code synthesis. However, its application in biology is hindered, as most biological outcomes are non-verifiable. For example, verifying a generated gene sequence is usually infeasible. In this paper, we introduce CellDuality, a self-supervised framework that enables LLM agents for robust reasoning in single-cell biology. Our framework is built on the principle of complementary task duality, a self-verification process that leverages a bidirectional reasoning loop. First, the model performs a forward reasoning task by predicting a biological outcome (e.g., a cell's response to a drug). Then, in a complementary inverse task, it must reason backward from its own prediction to reconstruct the initial conditions (e.g., the original drug perturbation). The fidelity of this reconstruction serves as an intrinsic reward signal, creating a feedback loop that enforces logical and biological consistency. We use these intrinsic rewards to align the base LLM via reinforcement learning, without requiring ground-truth verification labels. We demonstrate that CellDuality achieves state-of-the-art performance and provides coherent biological explanations across a diverse suite of single-cell reasoning tasks. Critically, on the challenging out-of-distribution perturbation prediction benchmark, our self-supervised approach significantly outperforms the standard fine-tuning baseline and narrows the performance gap to a supervised RLVR baseline. Our work showcases a new path toward scalable training of biological foundation models.</p>","PeriodicalId":521258,"journal":{"name":"... International Conference on Learning Representations","volume":"2026 ","pages":"115272-115283"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13441433/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"... International Conference on Learning Representations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Developing generalist large language models (LLMs) capable of complex biological reasoning is a central challenge in computational biology. While existing LLMs excel at predictive tasks like cell type annotation and logically-constrained problems, enabling open-ended and mechanistic reasoning remains a challenge. A promising direction is Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Rewards (RLVR), which has been shown to significantly enhance complex reasoning in general domains like mathematics and code synthesis. However, its application in biology is hindered, as most biological outcomes are non-verifiable. For example, verifying a generated gene sequence is usually infeasible. In this paper, we introduce CellDuality, a self-supervised framework that enables LLM agents for robust reasoning in single-cell biology. Our framework is built on the principle of complementary task duality, a self-verification process that leverages a bidirectional reasoning loop. First, the model performs a forward reasoning task by predicting a biological outcome (e.g., a cell's response to a drug). Then, in a complementary inverse task, it must reason backward from its own prediction to reconstruct the initial conditions (e.g., the original drug perturbation). The fidelity of this reconstruction serves as an intrinsic reward signal, creating a feedback loop that enforces logical and biological consistency. We use these intrinsic rewards to align the base LLM via reinforcement learning, without requiring ground-truth verification labels. We demonstrate that CellDuality achieves state-of-the-art performance and provides coherent biological explanations across a diverse suite of single-cell reasoning tasks. Critically, on the challenging out-of-distribution perturbation prediction benchmark, our self-supervised approach significantly outperforms the standard fine-tuning baseline and narrows the performance gap to a supervised RLVR baseline. Our work showcases a new path toward scalable training of biological foundation models.

细胞对偶性:用自监督RLVR解锁llm中的生物推理。
开发能够进行复杂生物推理的通才大语言模型(LLMs)是计算生物学的核心挑战。虽然现有的法学硕士擅长于预测任务,如细胞类型注释和逻辑约束问题,但实现开放式和机械推理仍然是一个挑战。一个很有前途的方向是来自可验证奖励的强化学习(RLVR),它已被证明可以显着增强数学和代码合成等一般领域的复杂推理。然而,它在生物学中的应用受到阻碍,因为大多数生物学结果是不可验证的。例如,验证生成的基因序列通常是不可行的。在本文中,我们介绍了CellDuality,这是一个自我监督框架,使LLM代理能够在单细胞生物学中进行鲁棒推理。我们的框架建立在互补任务对偶性的原则之上,这是一个利用双向推理循环的自我验证过程。首先,该模型通过预测生物结果(例如,细胞对药物的反应)来执行前向推理任务。然后,在互补逆任务中,它必须从自己的预测向后推理,以重建初始条件(例如,原始药物扰动)。这种重建的保真度作为一种内在的奖励信号,创造了一个强化逻辑和生物一致性的反馈循环。我们使用这些内在奖励通过强化学习来对齐基础LLM,而不需要基础事实验证标签。我们证明CellDuality实现了最先进的性能,并在不同的单细胞推理任务中提供了连贯的生物学解释。关键是,在具有挑战性的分布外扰动预测基准上,我们的自监督方法显着优于标准微调基线,并缩小了与监督RLVR基线的性能差距。我们的工作展示了生物基础模型可扩展训练的新途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书