Supporting homecare workers to provide palliative and end-of-life care: A scoping review of interventions and their implementation.

IF 2.7 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Palliative Care and Social Practice Pub Date : 2026-08-04 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26323524261467434
Lesley E Williamson, Annika Dhawan, Fatima Mujtabah, Ai Qi Katrina Yeung, Monica Leverton, Katherine E Sleeman, Abigail Burgess, Clare Ellis-Smith, Catherine J Evans
{"title":"Supporting homecare workers to provide palliative and end-of-life care: A scoping review of interventions and their implementation.","authors":"Lesley E Williamson, Annika Dhawan, Fatima Mujtabah, Ai Qi Katrina Yeung, Monica Leverton, Katherine E Sleeman, Abigail Burgess, Clare Ellis-Smith, Catherine J Evans","doi":"10.1177/26323524261467434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social homecare workers provide care to enable people to live as independently as possible in their own homes. They play a central role in supporting palliative and end-of-life care but often encounter challenges and can feel disempowered.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to scope the evidence on interventions to support homecare workers' provision of palliative and end-of-life care, and the contextual factors that influence their implementation.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>Papers were included if they reported primary research of any design, evaluating any intervention supporting homecare workers to provide palliative and end-of-life care.</p><p><strong>Sources of evidence: </strong>We systematically searched four bibliographic databases and supplemented this with reference chaining and grey literature searching.</p><p><strong>Charting methods: </strong>Using a qualitative content analysis, we deductively mapped data against the four contextual domains of the Practical Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found 13 papers reporting interventions to support homecare workers to provide palliative and end-of-life care, of which only seven described contextual factors that influence their implementation. The most common intervention type was training, and most cited contextual factors related to homecare workers' perspectives of the intervention. Characteristics relating to homecare workers' schedules and agency staff turnover were also described as influencing implementation of interventions. However, few reported the influence of the perspectives or characteristics of managers, people receiving homecare, and families. Only two of the seven papers mentioned the influence of the external environment or infrastructure to promote implementation and sustainability of interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The scarcity of evidence on interventions and their implementation is a missed opportunity to support the homecare sector's response to increasing demand for community-based care and reduced hospital deaths. Better understanding of how the workforce can be supported to provide palliative and end-of-life care, in a sustainable way, would help facilitate high-quality care at home for people approaching the end of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":36693,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","volume":"20 ","pages":"26323524261467434"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13438218/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524261467434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Social homecare workers provide care to enable people to live as independently as possible in their own homes. They play a central role in supporting palliative and end-of-life care but often encounter challenges and can feel disempowered.

Objectives: We aimed to scope the evidence on interventions to support homecare workers' provision of palliative and end-of-life care, and the contextual factors that influence their implementation.

Eligibility criteria: Papers were included if they reported primary research of any design, evaluating any intervention supporting homecare workers to provide palliative and end-of-life care.

Sources of evidence: We systematically searched four bibliographic databases and supplemented this with reference chaining and grey literature searching.

Charting methods: Using a qualitative content analysis, we deductively mapped data against the four contextual domains of the Practical Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model.

Results: We found 13 papers reporting interventions to support homecare workers to provide palliative and end-of-life care, of which only seven described contextual factors that influence their implementation. The most common intervention type was training, and most cited contextual factors related to homecare workers' perspectives of the intervention. Characteristics relating to homecare workers' schedules and agency staff turnover were also described as influencing implementation of interventions. However, few reported the influence of the perspectives or characteristics of managers, people receiving homecare, and families. Only two of the seven papers mentioned the influence of the external environment or infrastructure to promote implementation and sustainability of interventions.

Conclusions: The scarcity of evidence on interventions and their implementation is a missed opportunity to support the homecare sector's response to increasing demand for community-based care and reduced hospital deaths. Better understanding of how the workforce can be supported to provide palliative and end-of-life care, in a sustainable way, would help facilitate high-quality care at home for people approaching the end of life.

支持家庭护理工作者提供姑息治疗和临终关怀:干预措施及其实施的范围审查。
背景:社会家庭护理工作者提供护理,使人们尽可能独立地生活在自己的家中。他们在支持姑息治疗和临终关怀方面发挥着核心作用,但经常遇到挑战,并感到被剥夺了权力。目的:我们旨在对支持家庭护理工作者提供姑息和临终关怀的干预措施以及影响其实施的背景因素的证据进行范围研究。入选标准:如果论文报告了任何设计的初步研究,评估任何支持家庭护理工作者提供姑息治疗和临终关怀的干预措施,则纳入。证据来源:我们系统地检索了四个书目数据库,并辅以参考文献链和灰色文献检索。制图方法:使用定性内容分析,我们根据实际稳健实施和可持续性模型的四个上下文域演绎映射数据。结果:我们发现13篇论文报告了支持家庭护理工作者提供姑息治疗和临终关怀的干预措施,其中只有7篇描述了影响其实施的环境因素。最常见的干预类型是培训,并且最常提到的环境因素与家庭护理工作者对干预的看法有关。与家庭护理工作者的时间表和机构工作人员更替有关的特征也被描述为影响干预措施的实施。然而,很少有人报告了管理者、接受家庭护理的人以及家庭的观点或特征的影响。七篇论文中只有两篇提到了外部环境或基础设施对促进干预措施的执行和可持续性的影响。结论:缺乏干预措施及其实施的证据,错失了支持家庭护理部门应对日益增长的社区护理需求和减少医院死亡的机会。更好地了解如何支持劳动力以可持续的方式提供姑息治疗和临终关怀,将有助于为接近生命终点的人提供高质量的家庭护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Palliative Care and Social Practice
Palliative Care and Social Practice Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书