Subcutaneous Amivantamab and Lazertinib in PALOMA-3: Efficacy, Safety, and Administration: A Vodcast.

IF 5.1 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Targeted Oncology Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-06 DOI:10.1007/s11523-026-01248-7
Danny Nguyen
{"title":"Subcutaneous Amivantamab and Lazertinib in PALOMA-3: Efficacy, Safety, and Administration: A Vodcast.","authors":"Danny Nguyen","doi":"10.1007/s11523-026-01248-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intravenous (IV) amivantamab, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-MET bispecific antibody, is approved for multiple indications alone or in combination for patients with EGFR-mutated advanced or metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the PALOMA-3 study, subcutaneous (SC) amivantamab was investigated to improve tolerability, reduce administration time, maintain efficacy, and improve patient experience. This vodcast reviews the rationale and data supporting SC amivantamab on the basis of the PALOMA-3 study and provides expert-led recommendations for SC amivantamab treatment. The PALOMA-3 study investigated the noninferiority of pharmacokinetics, with other endpoints including efficacy and safety of SC versus IV amivantamab, combined with lazertinib in participants with EGFR-mutated, advanced NSCLC after disease progression on osimertinib and platinum-based chemotherapy. Geometric mean ratios of C<sub>trough</sub> for SC to IV amivantamab were 1.15 at Cycle 2 Day 1 (C2D1) and 1.42 at C4D1; C2<sub>AUCD1-D15</sub> was 1.035. Objective response rate (ORR) was 30% in the SC group and 33% in the IV group; median progression-free survival was 6.1 and 4.3 months, respectively. SC amivantamab resulted in fewer patients reporting infusion-related reactions (IRR; 13% versus 66% IV) and venous thromboembolism (VTE; 9% versus 14%) with prophylactic anticoagulation; shorter administration time at C1D1 (< 5 min per SC injection versus ~ 5 h for IV); and higher patient-reported convenience at the end of treatment (85% versus 35%). We discuss clinical considerations for SC amivantamab dosing and administration, including premedications, prophylactic measures, dose modifications, management of adverse reactions, and switching between IV and SC amivantamab. In conclusion, SC amivantamab demonstrated noninferior pharmacokinetics and antitumor responses compared with IV amivantamab in the PALOMA-3 study. SC amivantamab also reduced IRR and VTE, with shorter treatment administration times and enhanced patient convenience compared with IV. Utilizing SC amivantamab, while optimizing treatment efficacy and safety through mitigating and managing adverse events, may enhance the patient experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":22195,"journal":{"name":"Targeted Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"617-620"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13630892/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Targeted Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-026-01248-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intravenous (IV) amivantamab, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-MET bispecific antibody, is approved for multiple indications alone or in combination for patients with EGFR-mutated advanced or metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the PALOMA-3 study, subcutaneous (SC) amivantamab was investigated to improve tolerability, reduce administration time, maintain efficacy, and improve patient experience. This vodcast reviews the rationale and data supporting SC amivantamab on the basis of the PALOMA-3 study and provides expert-led recommendations for SC amivantamab treatment. The PALOMA-3 study investigated the noninferiority of pharmacokinetics, with other endpoints including efficacy and safety of SC versus IV amivantamab, combined with lazertinib in participants with EGFR-mutated, advanced NSCLC after disease progression on osimertinib and platinum-based chemotherapy. Geometric mean ratios of Ctrough for SC to IV amivantamab were 1.15 at Cycle 2 Day 1 (C2D1) and 1.42 at C4D1; C2AUCD1-D15 was 1.035. Objective response rate (ORR) was 30% in the SC group and 33% in the IV group; median progression-free survival was 6.1 and 4.3 months, respectively. SC amivantamab resulted in fewer patients reporting infusion-related reactions (IRR; 13% versus 66% IV) and venous thromboembolism (VTE; 9% versus 14%) with prophylactic anticoagulation; shorter administration time at C1D1 (< 5 min per SC injection versus ~ 5 h for IV); and higher patient-reported convenience at the end of treatment (85% versus 35%). We discuss clinical considerations for SC amivantamab dosing and administration, including premedications, prophylactic measures, dose modifications, management of adverse reactions, and switching between IV and SC amivantamab. In conclusion, SC amivantamab demonstrated noninferior pharmacokinetics and antitumor responses compared with IV amivantamab in the PALOMA-3 study. SC amivantamab also reduced IRR and VTE, with shorter treatment administration times and enhanced patient convenience compared with IV. Utilizing SC amivantamab, while optimizing treatment efficacy and safety through mitigating and managing adverse events, may enhance the patient experience.

皮下阿米万他单和拉泽替尼在PALOMA-3:疗效,安全性和给药:一个Vodcast。
静脉注射(IV) amivantamab是一种表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)-MET双特异性抗体,被批准单独或联合用于EGFR突变的晚期或转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的多种适应症。在PALOMA-3研究中,研究了皮下(SC)阿米万他单抗以提高耐受性,缩短给药时间,保持疗效并改善患者体验。本播客在PALOMA-3研究的基础上回顾了支持SC阿米万他抗的基本原理和数据,并提供了专家主导的SC阿米万他抗治疗建议。PALOMA-3研究调查了药代动力学的非劣效性,其他终点包括egfr突变的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者在接受奥西替尼和铂基化疗后,SC与静脉阿米万他单抗联合拉泽替尼的疗效和安全性。在第2周期第1天(C2D1), SC与IV阿米万他单抗的几何平均穿透率为1.15,在C4D1时为1.42;C2AUCD1-D15为1.035。客观缓解率(ORR) SC组为30%,IV组为33%;中位无进展生存期分别为6.1个月和4.3个月。在预防性抗凝治疗中,SC amivantamab导致更少的患者报告输注相关反应(IRR, 13%对66%静脉)和静脉血栓栓塞(VTE, 9%对14%);C1D1给药时间较短(每次SC注射< 5分钟,而静脉注射约5小时);在治疗结束时患者报告的便利性更高(85%对35%)。我们讨论了临床考虑,包括预用药,预防措施,剂量调整,不良反应的管理,以及静脉注射和静脉注射之间的切换阿米万他单抗。总之,在PALOMA-3研究中,与静脉注射阿米万他单抗相比,SC阿米万他单抗的药代动力学和抗肿瘤反应优于静脉注射阿米万他单抗。与静脉注射相比,SC阿米万他单抗还降低了IRR和VTE,缩短了给药时间,增强了患者的便利性。使用SC阿米万他单抗,同时通过减轻和管理不良事件优化了治疗疗效和安全性,可以改善患者体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Targeted Oncology
Targeted Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
64
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Targeted Oncology addresses physicians and scientists committed to oncology and cancer research by providing a programme of articles on molecularly targeted pharmacotherapy in oncology. The journal includes: Original Research Articles on all aspects of molecularly targeted agents for the treatment of cancer, including immune checkpoint inhibitors and related approaches. Comprehensive narrative Review Articles and shorter Leading Articles discussing relevant clinically established as well as emerging agents and pathways. Current Opinion articles that place interesting areas in perspective. Therapy in Practice articles that provide a guide to the optimum management of a condition and highlight practical, clinically relevant considerations and recommendations. Systematic Reviews that use explicit, systematic methods as outlined by the PRISMA statement. Adis Drug Reviews of the properties and place in therapy of both newer and established targeted drugs in oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书