Burden and Treatment Preference of Probable Neuropathic Pain in 13 592 people: A Cross-Sectional and Discrete Choice Experiment in the General Population in Malaysia
Wee-Kiat Tan, Maznah Dahlui, Azhari Rosman, Hiang Leng Tan, Noraidah Guntalib, Siew Pheng Chan, Shalini Sree Dharan, Pei Chiek Teh, Daniel Yi Jie Wong, Kenny Tan, Solomon Tesfaye, Lee-Ling Lim
{"title":"Burden and Treatment Preference of Probable Neuropathic Pain in 13 592 people: A Cross-Sectional and Discrete Choice Experiment in the General Population in Malaysia","authors":"Wee-Kiat Tan, Maznah Dahlui, Azhari Rosman, Hiang Leng Tan, Noraidah Guntalib, Siew Pheng Chan, Shalini Sree Dharan, Pei Chiek Teh, Daniel Yi Jie Wong, Kenny Tan, Solomon Tesfaye, Lee-Ling Lim","doi":"10.1111/jns.70154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Neuropathic pain (NeuP) is widely underdiagnosed, and treatment-related adverse events often drive nonadherence. We investigated the probable NeuP prevalence, symptoms recognition, and treatment preferences among the general population in Malaysia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We utilized a digital ID-Pain questionnaire across nine tertiary hospitals to screen for probable NeuP. We also designed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to assess participants' ability to differentiate NeuP from nociceptive symptoms and to evaluate treatment preferences across five attributes (perceived pain reduction, time to effect, proven effectiveness, risk of common side effects, and cost) among the general population.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The screening cohort included 13 592 adults (17.1% with diabetes). The overall prevalence of screen-positive for probable NeuP was 18.3% in the general population, increasing to 40.1% among people with diabetes. In the DCE cohort (<i>n</i> = 3999), 82.1% of participants demonstrated poor-to-moderate NeuP symptom recognition. Regarding treatment preferences, avoiding a high risk of common side effects was the primary driver of choice (coefficient −1.744, 95% CI −1.820, −1.669), followed by the desire for strong scientific evidence (coefficient 1.237, 95% CI 1.182, 1.291). Apart from clinical attributes, participants showed significant cost sensitivity (coefficient −5.565, 95% CI −6.909, −4.221).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Interpretation</h3>\n \n <p>Despite a high prevalence of probable NeuP, poor symptom recognition creates a significant diagnostic challenge. Given that aversion to side effects is prioritized over other attributes, clinicians need to focus on tolerable anti-neuropathic agents and employ proactive side-effect management to optimize NeuP treatment adherence.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System","volume":"31 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13437251/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jns.70154","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and Aim
Neuropathic pain (NeuP) is widely underdiagnosed, and treatment-related adverse events often drive nonadherence. We investigated the probable NeuP prevalence, symptoms recognition, and treatment preferences among the general population in Malaysia.
Methods
We utilized a digital ID-Pain questionnaire across nine tertiary hospitals to screen for probable NeuP. We also designed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to assess participants' ability to differentiate NeuP from nociceptive symptoms and to evaluate treatment preferences across five attributes (perceived pain reduction, time to effect, proven effectiveness, risk of common side effects, and cost) among the general population.
Results
The screening cohort included 13 592 adults (17.1% with diabetes). The overall prevalence of screen-positive for probable NeuP was 18.3% in the general population, increasing to 40.1% among people with diabetes. In the DCE cohort (n = 3999), 82.1% of participants demonstrated poor-to-moderate NeuP symptom recognition. Regarding treatment preferences, avoiding a high risk of common side effects was the primary driver of choice (coefficient −1.744, 95% CI −1.820, −1.669), followed by the desire for strong scientific evidence (coefficient 1.237, 95% CI 1.182, 1.291). Apart from clinical attributes, participants showed significant cost sensitivity (coefficient −5.565, 95% CI −6.909, −4.221).
Interpretation
Despite a high prevalence of probable NeuP, poor symptom recognition creates a significant diagnostic challenge. Given that aversion to side effects is prioritized over other attributes, clinicians need to focus on tolerable anti-neuropathic agents and employ proactive side-effect management to optimize NeuP treatment adherence.
背景和目的:神经性疼痛(NeuP)被广泛低估,治疗相关的不良事件经常导致不依从。我们调查了马来西亚普通人群中可能的NeuP患病率、症状识别和治疗偏好。方法:我们在九家三级医院使用数字ID-Pain问卷来筛选可能的NeuP。我们还设计了一个离散选择实验(DCE)来评估参与者区分NeuP和伤害性症状的能力,并评估普通人群中五个属性(感知疼痛减轻、效果时间、已证实的有效性、常见副作用的风险和成本)的治疗偏好。结果:筛查队列包括13592名成年人(17.1%患有糖尿病)。在一般人群中,可能的NeuP筛查阳性的总体患病率为18.3%,在糖尿病患者中增加到40.1%。在DCE队列中(n = 3999), 82.1%的参与者表现出较差至中度的NeuP症状识别。关于治疗偏好,避免常见副作用的高风险是选择的主要驱动因素(系数-1.744,95% CI -1.820, -1.669),其次是对强有力的科学证据的渴望(系数1.237,95% CI 1.182, 1.291)。除了临床属性外,参与者表现出显著的成本敏感性(系数-5.565,95% CI -6.909, -4.221)。解释:尽管可能的NeuP患病率很高,但较差的症状识别造成了重大的诊断挑战。考虑到对副作用的厌恶优先于其他属性,临床医生需要关注可耐受的抗神经病变药物,并采用积极的副作用管理来优化NeuP治疗的依从性。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System is the official journal of the Peripheral Nerve Society. Founded in 1996, it is the scientific journal of choice for clinicians, clinical scientists and basic neuroscientists interested in all aspects of biology and clinical research of peripheral nervous system disorders.
The Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes high quality articles on cell and molecular biology, genomics, neuropathic pain, clinical research, trials, and unique case reports on inherited and acquired peripheral neuropathies.
Original articles are organized according to the topic in one of four specific areas: Mechanisms of Disease, Genetics, Clinical Research, and Clinical Trials.
The journal also publishes regular review papers on hot topics and Special Issues on basic, clinical, or assembled research in the field of peripheral nervous system disorders. Authors interested in contributing a review-type article or a Special Issue should contact the Editorial Office to discuss the scope of the proposed article with the Editor-in-Chief.