Attitudes, perceptions, and beliefs related to full practice authority for advanced practice registered nurses.

IF 1.6 4区 医学
Mark D Miller, Jennifer C Barut
{"title":"Attitudes, perceptions, and beliefs related to full practice authority for advanced practice registered nurses.","authors":"Mark D Miller, Jennifer C Barut","doi":"10.1097/JXX.0000000000001315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) play a critical role in addressing health care access, yet regulatory barriers in states without full practice authority (FPA) limit their capacity to provide care. Tennessee remains a restricted-practice state, and limited data exist on Tennessee APRNs' attitudes and perceptions regarding FPA.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this Doctor of Nursing Practice project was to examine the attitudes, perceptions, and beliefs of APRNs in Tennessee related to FPA and to identify factors influencing their perspectives.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A cross-sectional, web-based survey was distributed via email to all APRNs listed in the Tennessee state licensure database from October 1 through December 31, 2023. The survey included a total of 26 structured questions with Likert-type responses and open-ended questions. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were used to analyze quantitative and qualitative data, respectively. The Vanderbilt Institutional Review Board exempted the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,484 APRNs responded (9% response rate), with 1,281 complete responses. Most respondents were nurse practitioners ( n = 1,285; 86.6%). More than two thirds ( n = 978; 67.4%) indicated a preference for FPA, with rural APRNs showing significantly higher support (76.5%) compared with suburban (63.3%) and urban (63.5%) APRNs. Although 81.5% of respondents reported a strong understanding of FPA, qualitative analysis of 7,630 open-ended responses revealed that approximately 25% of those reporting a high level of understanding held misconceptions about FPA's scope and implications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tennessee APRNs broadly support FPA, particularly those in rural settings, yet significant misconceptions persist. These findings highlight the need for targeted educational initiatives and informed advocacy to advance FPA policy in Tennessee and other restricted-practice states.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Targeted education is needed to address APRN knowledge gaps and bolster advocacy. Advancing FPA will require coordinated education, legislative action, and public awareness to improve health care access and workforce utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":17179,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners","volume":" ","pages":"837-846"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JXX.0000000000001315","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) play a critical role in addressing health care access, yet regulatory barriers in states without full practice authority (FPA) limit their capacity to provide care. Tennessee remains a restricted-practice state, and limited data exist on Tennessee APRNs' attitudes and perceptions regarding FPA.

Purpose: The purpose of this Doctor of Nursing Practice project was to examine the attitudes, perceptions, and beliefs of APRNs in Tennessee related to FPA and to identify factors influencing their perspectives.

Methodology: A cross-sectional, web-based survey was distributed via email to all APRNs listed in the Tennessee state licensure database from October 1 through December 31, 2023. The survey included a total of 26 structured questions with Likert-type responses and open-ended questions. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were used to analyze quantitative and qualitative data, respectively. The Vanderbilt Institutional Review Board exempted the study.

Results: A total of 1,484 APRNs responded (9% response rate), with 1,281 complete responses. Most respondents were nurse practitioners ( n = 1,285; 86.6%). More than two thirds ( n = 978; 67.4%) indicated a preference for FPA, with rural APRNs showing significantly higher support (76.5%) compared with suburban (63.3%) and urban (63.5%) APRNs. Although 81.5% of respondents reported a strong understanding of FPA, qualitative analysis of 7,630 open-ended responses revealed that approximately 25% of those reporting a high level of understanding held misconceptions about FPA's scope and implications.

Conclusions: Tennessee APRNs broadly support FPA, particularly those in rural settings, yet significant misconceptions persist. These findings highlight the need for targeted educational initiatives and informed advocacy to advance FPA policy in Tennessee and other restricted-practice states.

Implications: Targeted education is needed to address APRN knowledge gaps and bolster advocacy. Advancing FPA will require coordinated education, legislative action, and public awareness to improve health care access and workforce utilization.

对高级执业注册护士充分执业权威的态度、观念和信念。
背景:高级执业注册护士(APRNs)在解决卫生保健获取方面发挥着关键作用,但在没有完全执业权(FPA)的州,监管障碍限制了他们提供护理的能力。田纳西州仍然是一个限制执业的州,关于田纳西州APRNs对FPA的态度和看法的数据有限。目的:本护理实践博士项目的目的是调查田纳西州APRNs对FPA的态度、认知和信念,并确定影响其观点的因素。方法:从2023年10月1日至12月31日,通过电子邮件向田纳西州许可证数据库中列出的所有aprn分发一项基于网络的横断面调查。该调查包括26个结构化问题,李克特式回答和开放式问题。定量数据采用描述性统计,定性数据采用专题分析。范德比尔特机构审查委员会豁免了这项研究。结果:共1484例APRNs应答(有效率9%),其中1281例完全应答。调查对象以执业护士为主(1285人,86.6%)。超过三分之二(n = 978; 67.4%)的人表示更喜欢FPA,其中农村APRNs的支持率(76.5%)明显高于郊区(63.3%)和城市(63.5%)APRNs。尽管81.5%的受访者表示对FPA有深刻的理解,但对7630份开放式回答的定性分析显示,大约25%的受访者表示对FPA的范围和影响有高度的理解,但他们对FPA的范围和影响存在误解。结论:田纳西州aprn广泛支持FPA,特别是在农村地区,但仍存在重大误解。这些发现强调了有针对性的教育倡议和知情宣传的必要性,以推进田纳西州和其他限制实践州的FPA政策。意义:有针对性的教育需要解决APRN知识差距和加强宣传。推进FPA需要协调教育、立法行动和公众意识,以改善医疗服务的获取和劳动力的利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
16.70%
发文量
172
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners (JAANP) is a monthly peer-reviewed professional journal that serves as the official publication of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners. Published since 1989, the JAANP provides a strong clinical focus with articles related to primary, secondary, and tertiary care, nurse practitioner education, health policy, ethics and ethical issues, and health care delivery. The journal publishes original research, integrative/comprehensive reviews, case studies, a variety of topics in clinical practice, and theory-based articles related to patient and professional education. Although the majority of nurse practitioners function in primary care, there is an increasing focus on the provision of care across all types of systems from acute to long-term care settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书