Evolving organisational models in urban orthopaedic practice in India: A structured narrative review.

IF 1.6 4区 医学
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-06 DOI:10.1177/10225536261476473
Raghu Yelavarthi, Ravi Chandra Vattipalli
{"title":"Evolving organisational models in urban orthopaedic practice in India: A structured narrative review.","authors":"Raghu Yelavarthi, Ravi Chandra Vattipalli","doi":"10.1177/10225536261476473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Urban orthopaedic practice in India is undergoing profound organisational change driven by population ageing, an increasing burden of musculoskeletal disease, expanding subspecialisation, technological advances, and growing regulatory and quality-reporting requirements. These developments have renewed interest in organisational models capable of supporting coordinated, high-quality musculoskeletal care while maintaining clinical efficiency and professional sustainability. This structured narrative review evaluates contemporary organisational models of orthopaedic practice, with particular emphasis on structured group practice, within the Indian healthcare context. A structured narrative review was undertaken using PubMed as the primary database, supplemented by targeted Google Scholar searches and manual reference screening. Forty-five publications meeting predefined eligibility criteria were included in the final narrative synthesis. Evidence relating to orthopaedic practice organisation, subspecialisation, volume-outcome relationships, multidisciplinary care, clinical governance, registry participation, workforce wellbeing, health-system organisation, and practice sustainability was synthesised. The available literature suggests that structured group practice may facilitate subspecialty-focused care, multidisciplinary collaboration, standardisation of perioperative pathways, registry participation, continuous quality improvement, and equitable workload distribution. However, direct comparative evidence demonstrating superiority over well-organised solo or small-group practice remains limited, particularly in India. Many reported advantages appear to arise from effective evidence-based organisational processes rather than organisational size alone. The available evidence suggests that organisational models capable of supporting multidisciplinary care, clinical governance, and evidence-based organisational processes are increasingly important for contemporary orthopaedic practice. Structured group practice represents one context-dependent organisational approach that may be particularly relevant to urban India. The review identifies important evidence gaps, particularly the lack of comparative Indian studies, and highlights priorities for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":16608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":"34 2","pages":"10225536261476473"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10225536261476473","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urban orthopaedic practice in India is undergoing profound organisational change driven by population ageing, an increasing burden of musculoskeletal disease, expanding subspecialisation, technological advances, and growing regulatory and quality-reporting requirements. These developments have renewed interest in organisational models capable of supporting coordinated, high-quality musculoskeletal care while maintaining clinical efficiency and professional sustainability. This structured narrative review evaluates contemporary organisational models of orthopaedic practice, with particular emphasis on structured group practice, within the Indian healthcare context. A structured narrative review was undertaken using PubMed as the primary database, supplemented by targeted Google Scholar searches and manual reference screening. Forty-five publications meeting predefined eligibility criteria were included in the final narrative synthesis. Evidence relating to orthopaedic practice organisation, subspecialisation, volume-outcome relationships, multidisciplinary care, clinical governance, registry participation, workforce wellbeing, health-system organisation, and practice sustainability was synthesised. The available literature suggests that structured group practice may facilitate subspecialty-focused care, multidisciplinary collaboration, standardisation of perioperative pathways, registry participation, continuous quality improvement, and equitable workload distribution. However, direct comparative evidence demonstrating superiority over well-organised solo or small-group practice remains limited, particularly in India. Many reported advantages appear to arise from effective evidence-based organisational processes rather than organisational size alone. The available evidence suggests that organisational models capable of supporting multidisciplinary care, clinical governance, and evidence-based organisational processes are increasingly important for contemporary orthopaedic practice. Structured group practice represents one context-dependent organisational approach that may be particularly relevant to urban India. The review identifies important evidence gaps, particularly the lack of comparative Indian studies, and highlights priorities for future research.

在印度城市骨科实践中不断发展的组织模式:一个结构化的叙事回顾。
在人口老龄化、肌肉骨骼疾病负担日益加重、亚专业化程度不断扩大、技术进步以及监管和质量报告要求不断提高的推动下,印度的城市骨科实践正在经历深刻的组织变革。这些发展重新燃起了人们对组织模式的兴趣,这些模式能够支持协调、高质量的肌肉骨骼护理,同时保持临床效率和专业可持续性。这种结构化的叙事审查评估骨科实践的当代组织模式,特别强调结构化的群体实践,在印度医疗保健的背景下。以PubMed为主要数据库,辅以谷歌学者搜索和人工参考筛选,进行结构化的叙述性综述。45份符合预定资格标准的出版物被列入最后的叙述综合。综合了与骨科实践组织、亚专业化、数量-结果关系、多学科护理、临床治理、登记参与、劳动力福利、卫生系统组织和实践可持续性有关的证据。现有文献表明,结构化的小组实践可以促进以亚专科为重点的护理、多学科合作、围手术期途径的标准化、注册参与、持续的质量改进和公平的工作量分配。然而,证明优于组织良好的单人或小团体实践的直接比较证据仍然有限,特别是在印度。许多报告的优势似乎来自有效的循证组织流程,而不仅仅是组织规模。现有证据表明,能够支持多学科护理、临床治理和循证组织流程的组织模式对当代骨科实践越来越重要。结构化的小组实践代表了一种情境依赖的组织方法,可能与印度城市特别相关。该综述指出了重要的证据差距,特别是缺乏比较印度的研究,并强调了未来研究的重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery is an open access peer-reviewed journal publishing original reviews and research articles on all aspects of orthopaedic surgery. It is the official journal of the Asia Pacific Orthopaedic Association. The journal welcomes and will publish materials of a diverse nature, from basic science research to clinical trials and surgical techniques. The journal encourages contributions from all parts of the world, but special emphasis is given to research of particular relevance to the Asia Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书