Pharmaco-economic profile, effectiveness, and safety of a dolutegravir based first line ART regimen among people living with HIV in South Gujarat.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Brijeshkumar Sojitra, Chetna Patel, Krishnakant Niranjanbhai Bhatt, Sajal Pandya, Paras Shah, Akash Shah, Jaykumar Patel, Chirag Adwani, Vaibhav Panchal
{"title":"Pharmaco-economic profile, effectiveness, and safety of a dolutegravir based first line ART regimen among people living with HIV in South Gujarat.","authors":"Brijeshkumar Sojitra, Chetna Patel, Krishnakant Niranjanbhai Bhatt, Sajal Pandya, Paras Shah, Akash Shah, Jaykumar Patel, Chirag Adwani, Vaibhav Panchal","doi":"10.25259/IJMR_3640_2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background and objectives Dolutegravir (DTG)-based first line antiretroviral therapy (ART) is preferred globally due to its high efficacy, and tolerability. In India, data on evaluation of its pharmacoeconomic impact with effectiveness and safety remains limited. This study aimed to assess the pharmacoeconomic variables, effectiveness, and safety of the dolutegravir based first line ART regimen among people living with HIV (PLHIV) in south Gujarat. Methods This prospective, and observational study was conducted at an ART centre in a tertiary care hospital. Adults (≥18 yr) receiving first-line ART for ≥6 months were enrolled (n=204) following the informed consent. Pharmacoeconomic outcomes were evaluated using analysis of cost-effectiveness, cost minimisation, cost-utility, and cost-benefit. For effectiveness, CD4 count and plasma viral load (PVL) were recorded at baseline and 6 months. The safety was assessed using causality, severity, and preventability assessment of adverse drug reactions. Results Among 204 participants, 102 received TLD (tenofovir/lamivudine/dolutegravir) and 102 TLE (tenofovir/lamivudine/efavirenz). The TLD regimen demonstrated significantly better cost effectiveness (median CER 45.7 vs. 84.7; P<0.001) and lower mean annual treatment cost [INR (₹)17,074 vs. ₹19,283; P<0.001]. Quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and disability-adjusted life years (DALY) values were comparable between regimens. Both groups showed significant CD4 improvement over 6 months; inter-regimen differences were non-significant (P=0.386). Viral suppression at 6 months was higher with TLD (99% vs. 92.2%; P=0.019). Fourteen ADRs were reported for TLD group. Interpretation and conclusions Dolutegrevir-based regime demonstrated better cost effectiveness, lower annual cost, and more consistent viral load suppression, with comparable immunological recovery and a favourable safety profile, as compared to standard ART regime.</p>","PeriodicalId":13349,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Medical Research","volume":"164 2","pages":"252-259"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13466803/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/IJMR_3640_2025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives Dolutegravir (DTG)-based first line antiretroviral therapy (ART) is preferred globally due to its high efficacy, and tolerability. In India, data on evaluation of its pharmacoeconomic impact with effectiveness and safety remains limited. This study aimed to assess the pharmacoeconomic variables, effectiveness, and safety of the dolutegravir based first line ART regimen among people living with HIV (PLHIV) in south Gujarat. Methods This prospective, and observational study was conducted at an ART centre in a tertiary care hospital. Adults (≥18 yr) receiving first-line ART for ≥6 months were enrolled (n=204) following the informed consent. Pharmacoeconomic outcomes were evaluated using analysis of cost-effectiveness, cost minimisation, cost-utility, and cost-benefit. For effectiveness, CD4 count and plasma viral load (PVL) were recorded at baseline and 6 months. The safety was assessed using causality, severity, and preventability assessment of adverse drug reactions. Results Among 204 participants, 102 received TLD (tenofovir/lamivudine/dolutegravir) and 102 TLE (tenofovir/lamivudine/efavirenz). The TLD regimen demonstrated significantly better cost effectiveness (median CER 45.7 vs. 84.7; P<0.001) and lower mean annual treatment cost [INR (₹)17,074 vs. ₹19,283; P<0.001]. Quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and disability-adjusted life years (DALY) values were comparable between regimens. Both groups showed significant CD4 improvement over 6 months; inter-regimen differences were non-significant (P=0.386). Viral suppression at 6 months was higher with TLD (99% vs. 92.2%; P=0.019). Fourteen ADRs were reported for TLD group. Interpretation and conclusions Dolutegrevir-based regime demonstrated better cost effectiveness, lower annual cost, and more consistent viral load suppression, with comparable immunological recovery and a favourable safety profile, as compared to standard ART regime.

南古吉拉特邦艾滋病毒感染者中以多替韦为基础的一线抗逆转录病毒治疗方案的药物经济学概况、有效性和安全性。
背景和目的基于多替格拉韦(DTG)的一线抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)因其高效和耐受性而成为全球首选。在印度,评估其有效性和安全性的药物经济学影响的数据仍然有限。本研究旨在评估古吉拉特邦南部HIV感染者(PLHIV)中以多替格拉韦为基础的一线抗逆转录病毒治疗方案的药物经济学变量、有效性和安全性。方法本前瞻性观察性研究在某三级医院的ART中心进行。根据知情同意,纳入接受一线抗逆转录病毒治疗≥6个月的成人(≥18岁)(n=204)。使用成本-效果、成本最小化、成本-效用和成本-效益分析来评估药物经济学结果。在基线和6个月时记录CD4计数和血浆病毒载量(PVL)。安全性通过药物不良反应的因果关系、严重程度和可预防性评估来评估。结果在204名参与者中,102人接受TLD(替诺福韦/拉米夫定/多替格拉韦)治疗,102人接受TLE(替诺福韦/拉米夫定/依非韦伦)治疗。TLD方案显示出更好的成本效益(中位CER 45.7比84.7
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.40%
发文量
191
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Medical Research (IJMR) [ISSN 0971-5916] is one of the oldest medical Journals not only in India, but probably in Asia, as it started in the year 1913. The Journal was started as a quarterly (4 issues/year) in 1913 and made bimonthly (6 issues/year) in 1958. It became monthly (12 issues/year) in the year 1964.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书