Conceptualizing the “High” Bladder Neck – Anatomic Rabbit Hole or Functional Gold Mine?

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
European urology focus Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-05 DOI:10.1016/j.euf.2026.07.017
Melissa R. Kaufman, Hector S. Barba, Marcus J. Drake
{"title":"Conceptualizing the “High” Bladder Neck – Anatomic Rabbit Hole or Functional Gold Mine?","authors":"Melissa R. Kaufman,&nbsp;Hector S. Barba,&nbsp;Marcus J. Drake","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2026.07.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Describing a “high bladder neck” is common practice, yet it is not a standardized entity, and it lacks an evidence base in diagnostics and therapy. Recent systematic reviews report few trials, yet incision of the bladder neck remains a first-line therapy. The concept insinuates a basis for bladder outlet obstruction, so it is during voiding that such an issue should be assessed. For cystourethroscopy, the urinary tract is in the storage phase. A pressure-flow study in videourodynamics can visualize when the bladder neck is deflected into the proximal prostatic urethra by the force of bladder contraction, but this is rarely undertaken. Standard urodynamics may infer this diagnosis, but only by assuming the cause. Other forms of imaging are being evaluated, though they remain remote from delivering evidence based on therapy outcomes. Proper consensus regarding the “high bladder neck” is needed, primarily for standardization of terminology and agreement on justifiable endoscopic and imaging approaches.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":"12 4","pages":"Pages 684-687"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405456926001707","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Describing a “high bladder neck” is common practice, yet it is not a standardized entity, and it lacks an evidence base in diagnostics and therapy. Recent systematic reviews report few trials, yet incision of the bladder neck remains a first-line therapy. The concept insinuates a basis for bladder outlet obstruction, so it is during voiding that such an issue should be assessed. For cystourethroscopy, the urinary tract is in the storage phase. A pressure-flow study in videourodynamics can visualize when the bladder neck is deflected into the proximal prostatic urethra by the force of bladder contraction, but this is rarely undertaken. Standard urodynamics may infer this diagnosis, but only by assuming the cause. Other forms of imaging are being evaluated, though they remain remote from delivering evidence based on therapy outcomes. Proper consensus regarding the “high bladder neck” is needed, primarily for standardization of terminology and agreement on justifiable endoscopic and imaging approaches.
“高”膀胱颈的概念——解剖兔子洞还是功能金矿?
描述“高膀胱颈”是一种常见的做法,但它不是一个标准化的实体,在诊断和治疗中缺乏证据基础。最近的系统综述报道了一些试验,但膀胱颈部切口仍然是一线治疗方法。这个概念暗示了膀胱出口阻塞的基础,所以在排尿时应该评估这样的问题。膀胱输尿管镜检查时,尿路处于贮存期。视频尿动力学的压力流研究可以看到膀胱颈部在膀胱收缩的作用下偏转到前列腺尿道近端,但这种情况很少发生。标准尿动力学可以推断出这种诊断,但只能通过假设病因。其他形式的成像正在评估中,尽管它们距离提供基于治疗结果的证据还很遥远。需要就“高膀胱颈”达成适当的共识,主要是为了标准化术语并就合理的内窥镜和成像方法达成一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European urology focus
European urology focus Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
274
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: European Urology Focus is a new sister journal to European Urology and an official publication of the European Association of Urology (EAU). EU Focus will publish original articles, opinion piece editorials and topical reviews on a wide range of urological issues such as oncology, functional urology, reconstructive urology, laparoscopy, robotic surgery, endourology, female urology, andrology, paediatric urology and sexual medicine. The editorial team welcome basic and translational research articles in the field of urological diseases. Authors may be solicited by the Editor directly. All submitted manuscripts will be peer-reviewed by a panel of experts before being considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书