Ultrasonographic assessment of pubertal maturation: a reliable and radiation-free model for bone age estimation.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Gulsun Akay, Cagrı Erdogdu, Nuray Bagcı, Ozge Karadag Atas, Kahraman Gungor
{"title":"Ultrasonographic assessment of pubertal maturation: a reliable and radiation-free model for bone age estimation.","authors":"Gulsun Akay, Cagrı Erdogdu, Nuray Bagcı, Ozge Karadag Atas, Kahraman Gungor","doi":"10.1093/dmfr/twag058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Developing methods that minimize radiation exposure in skeletal age assessment for orthodontic planning and growth monitoring in pediatric populations is a priority. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of ultrasonography as a non-ionizing alternative in bone age estimation and to analyze the correlation between ultrasonographic skeletal maturation and chronological age.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, the left hand-wrist region of 131 individuals aged 8-18 years was evaluated simultaneously using digital radiography and ultrasonography. Skeletal maturation was analyzed based on the epiphysis-diaphysis relationship of the phalanges and radius, the presence of sesamoid bone, and bone age estimation based on the Greulich-Pyle atlas. In addition, the ossification ratios (o/O) of the distal radius and ulna were calculated. Friedman, Wilcoxon signed-rank, McNemar tests, and regression analyses were used to compare the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A strong correlation was found between chronological age, ultrasonographic age, and radiographic age. Statistically significant differences were found between ultrasonography and radiography measurements in all middle phalanges (MP2-MP5), the distal phalanx of the fourth finger (DP4), the distal and proximal phalanges of the first finger (DP1, PP1), proximal phalanges of the second finger (PP2) and the radius (p < 0.05). A high correlation (r = 0.862) was observed between the two methods used to detect sesamoid bones. A strong positive correlation (rs ≈ 0.70) was observed between chronological age and ultrasonographic ossification rates; the explanatory power of radius and ulna measurements on age was 54%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ultrasonography shows a strong correlation with both chronological and radiographic age and demonstrates high efficacy in detecting sesamoid bones and monitoring ossification rates. Statistically significant differences have been found between radiographic examination and ultrasonography in evaluating the epiphysis-diaphysis relationship of the phalanges.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>This research demonstrates that ultrasonography is a reliable, non-ionizing method for skeletal age assessment and shows significant diagnostic consistency across anatomical regions, similar to that of conventional radiography. Furthermore, it supports the clinical utility of ultrasonography as a reliable, radiation-free method and contributes to ongoing efforts to establish standardized, non-invasive assessment methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":11261,"journal":{"name":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twag058","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Developing methods that minimize radiation exposure in skeletal age assessment for orthodontic planning and growth monitoring in pediatric populations is a priority. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of ultrasonography as a non-ionizing alternative in bone age estimation and to analyze the correlation between ultrasonographic skeletal maturation and chronological age.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the left hand-wrist region of 131 individuals aged 8-18 years was evaluated simultaneously using digital radiography and ultrasonography. Skeletal maturation was analyzed based on the epiphysis-diaphysis relationship of the phalanges and radius, the presence of sesamoid bone, and bone age estimation based on the Greulich-Pyle atlas. In addition, the ossification ratios (o/O) of the distal radius and ulna were calculated. Friedman, Wilcoxon signed-rank, McNemar tests, and regression analyses were used to compare the data.

Results: A strong correlation was found between chronological age, ultrasonographic age, and radiographic age. Statistically significant differences were found between ultrasonography and radiography measurements in all middle phalanges (MP2-MP5), the distal phalanx of the fourth finger (DP4), the distal and proximal phalanges of the first finger (DP1, PP1), proximal phalanges of the second finger (PP2) and the radius (p < 0.05). A high correlation (r = 0.862) was observed between the two methods used to detect sesamoid bones. A strong positive correlation (rs ≈ 0.70) was observed between chronological age and ultrasonographic ossification rates; the explanatory power of radius and ulna measurements on age was 54%.

Conclusions: Ultrasonography shows a strong correlation with both chronological and radiographic age and demonstrates high efficacy in detecting sesamoid bones and monitoring ossification rates. Statistically significant differences have been found between radiographic examination and ultrasonography in evaluating the epiphysis-diaphysis relationship of the phalanges.

Advances in knowledge: This research demonstrates that ultrasonography is a reliable, non-ionizing method for skeletal age assessment and shows significant diagnostic consistency across anatomical regions, similar to that of conventional radiography. Furthermore, it supports the clinical utility of ultrasonography as a reliable, radiation-free method and contributes to ongoing efforts to establish standardized, non-invasive assessment methods.

青春期成熟的超声评估:一种可靠和无辐射的骨龄估计模型。
目的:在儿童正畸计划和生长监测的骨骼年龄评估中,开发最小化辐射暴露的方法是一个优先事项。本研究旨在评估超声作为一种非电离替代方法在骨年龄估计中的诊断效果,并分析超声骨骼成熟度与实足年龄的相关性。方法:对131例8 ~ 18岁的患者,采用数字x线摄影和超声同时对其左腕区域进行测量。根据指骨和桡骨的骨骺-骨干关系、籽状骨的存在以及基于Greulich-Pyle图谱的骨龄估计来分析骨骼成熟度。计算桡骨和尺骨远端骨化比(o/ o)。采用Friedman、Wilcoxon sign -rank、McNemar检验和回归分析对数据进行比较。结果:实足年龄、超声年龄和x线年龄有较强的相关性。所有中指骨(MP2-MP5)、无名指远端指骨(DP4)、无名指远端指骨和近端指骨(DP1, PP1)、无名指近端指骨(PP2)、桡骨(p)的超声与x线测量差异均有统计学意义。超声检查显示与实足年龄和x线年龄有很强的相关性,在检测籽骨和监测骨化率方面表现出很高的效率。影像学检查与超声检查在评价指骨骨骺-骨干关系方面有统计学差异。知识进展:本研究表明,超声检查是一种可靠的、非电离的骨骼年龄评估方法,并显示出跨解剖区域的显著诊断一致性,类似于传统的x线摄影。此外,它支持超声检查作为一种可靠、无辐射的临床应用方法,并有助于建立标准化、无创的评估方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
65
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) is the journal of the International Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (IADMFR) and covers the closely related fields of oral radiology and head and neck imaging. Established in 1972, DMFR is a key resource keeping dentists, radiologists and clinicians and scientists with an interest in Head and Neck imaging abreast of important research and developments in oral and maxillofacial radiology. The DMFR editorial board features a panel of international experts including Editor-in-Chief Professor Ralf Schulze. Our editorial board provide their expertise and guidance in shaping the content and direction of the journal. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor - 1.919 - Receipt to first decision - average of 3 weeks - Acceptance to online publication - average of 3 weeks - Open access option - ISSN: 0250-832X - eISSN: 1476-542X
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书