Retrospective Analysis of eFAST Exams to Detect COVID-19 in Trauma Patients.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Emergency Medicine International Pub Date : 2026-07-10 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1155/emmi/6173255
Nicholas Gossett, Michelle Thao Nguyen, Roy Almog, Andy Hsueh, Soheil Saadat, Megan Guy, Edmund Hsu, Madison Nashu, Ronald Goubert, Amanda Dos Santos, Andy Nguyen, Matthew Whited, Jessa Baker, John Christian Fox
{"title":"Retrospective Analysis of eFAST Exams to Detect COVID-19 in Trauma Patients.","authors":"Nicholas Gossett, Michelle Thao Nguyen, Roy Almog, Andy Hsueh, Soheil Saadat, Megan Guy, Edmund Hsu, Madison Nashu, Ronald Goubert, Amanda Dos Santos, Andy Nguyen, Matthew Whited, Jessa Baker, John Christian Fox","doi":"10.1155/emmi/6173255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This original research study evaluates the utility of pulmonary point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) within the extended focused assessment with sonography in trauma (eFAST) exam to detect asymptomatic COVID-19 in emergency department trauma patients. Specifically, it examines whether lung findings, such as B-lines, pleural thickening, and subpleural consolidations, can indicate a COVID-19 infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective review includes trauma patients aged 18 years or older who underwent eFAST and COVID-19 swab testing at the University of California, Irvine Medical Center, from December 2020 to October 2022. Two blinded reviewers analyzed eFAST scans for more than two B-lines, irregular pleural interface, or subpleural consolidations, with discrepancies resolved by ultrasound fellows. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 152 patients were included. Of 41 eFAST scans positive for COVID-19 findings, six were confirmed by PCR testing, yielding a positive predictive value of 15.6% (CI: 7.9%-25.6%). Among the 111 eFAST scans negative for COVID-19, 10 were PCR-positive, giving a negative predictive value of 91.0% (CI: 84.1%-95.6%). Sensitivity was 37.5% (CI: 15.2%-64.6%), and specificity was 74.3% (CI: 66.1%-81.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lung POCUS within the eFAST exam is not a reliable tool for detecting asymptomatic COVID-19 infection in trauma patients due to limited sensitivity and low positive predictive value. Standard diagnostic methods, such as PCR testing, and the use of personal protective equipment should remain the primary approach to protect healthcare providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":11528,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine International","volume":"2026 ","pages":"6173255"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13352133/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/emmi/6173255","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This original research study evaluates the utility of pulmonary point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) within the extended focused assessment with sonography in trauma (eFAST) exam to detect asymptomatic COVID-19 in emergency department trauma patients. Specifically, it examines whether lung findings, such as B-lines, pleural thickening, and subpleural consolidations, can indicate a COVID-19 infection.

Methods: This retrospective review includes trauma patients aged 18 years or older who underwent eFAST and COVID-19 swab testing at the University of California, Irvine Medical Center, from December 2020 to October 2022. Two blinded reviewers analyzed eFAST scans for more than two B-lines, irregular pleural interface, or subpleural consolidations, with discrepancies resolved by ultrasound fellows. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: A total of 152 patients were included. Of 41 eFAST scans positive for COVID-19 findings, six were confirmed by PCR testing, yielding a positive predictive value of 15.6% (CI: 7.9%-25.6%). Among the 111 eFAST scans negative for COVID-19, 10 were PCR-positive, giving a negative predictive value of 91.0% (CI: 84.1%-95.6%). Sensitivity was 37.5% (CI: 15.2%-64.6%), and specificity was 74.3% (CI: 66.1%-81.4%).

Conclusion: Lung POCUS within the eFAST exam is not a reliable tool for detecting asymptomatic COVID-19 infection in trauma patients due to limited sensitivity and low positive predictive value. Standard diagnostic methods, such as PCR testing, and the use of personal protective equipment should remain the primary approach to protect healthcare providers.

创伤患者快速检测COVID-19的回顾性分析
背景:本原始研究评估了肺部即时超声(POCUS)在急诊创伤患者创伤超声扩展集中评估(eFAST)检查中检测无症状COVID-19的效用。具体来说,它检查肺部的表现,如b线、胸膜增厚和胸膜下实变,是否表明COVID-19感染。方法:本回顾性研究包括2020年12月至2022年10月在加州大学欧文分校医学中心接受eFAST和COVID-19拭子检测的18岁及以上创伤患者。两名盲法评估者分析了eFAST扫描中超过两条b线、不规则胸膜界面或胸膜下实变的情况,并通过超声检查解决了差异。灵敏度、特异性和预测值以95%置信区间(ci)计算。结果:共纳入152例患者。在41例新冠病毒阳性的eFAST扫描中,有6例通过PCR检测得到证实,阳性预测值为15.6% (CI: 7.9%-25.6%)。在111例阴性的eFAST扫描中,10例pcr阳性,阴性预测值为91.0% (CI: 84.1%-95.6%)。敏感性为37.5% (CI: 15.2% ~ 64.6%),特异性为74.3% (CI: 66.1% ~ 81.4%)。结论:eFAST检查下的肺POCUS敏感性有限,阳性预测值较低,不是一种可靠的检测创伤患者无症状COVID-19感染的工具。标准诊断方法(如聚合酶链反应检测)和使用个人防护装备仍应是保护卫生保健提供者的主要方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine International
Emergency Medicine International EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
187
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Emergency Medicine International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for doctors, nurses, paramedics and ambulance staff. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to prehospital care, disaster preparedness and response, acute medical and paediatric emergencies, critical care, sports medicine, wound care, and toxicology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书