Evaluation of Personal Protective Equipment Use Among Environmental Services Workers in Hospital Settings.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Stephanie Betancur, Ashley Leak Bryant, AnnMarie Lee Walton
{"title":"Evaluation of Personal Protective Equipment Use Among Environmental Services Workers in Hospital Settings.","authors":"Stephanie Betancur, Ashley Leak Bryant, AnnMarie Lee Walton","doi":"10.1188/26.CJON.275-282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Environmental services (EVS) workers in healthcare settings are at risk for exposure to hazardous drugs, including antineoplastic drugs, because of their role in cleaning, sanitizing, and disinfecting surfaces where patients have received these drugs. Personal protective equipment (PPE) is critical for minimizing exposure; because oncology nurses rely on EVS partners to maintain safe care environments, inconsistent PPE use has direct implications for team safety and oncology practice.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to assess PPE use among EVS workers in oncology and non-oncology settings, identify gaps between self-reported and observed PPE use, and explore factors influencing use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The team employed a mixed-methods approach, combining observational data with verbally administered questionnaire data. Twelve EVS workers from various units participated. Observations of PPE use and responses to adapted survey instruments provided insights into practices and perceptions.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Results revealed discrepancies between self-reported and observed PPE use, and participants frequently overestimated use. Participants commonly wore gloves, but they underused gloves tested for use with hazardous drugs, particularly in oncology settings. The team identified training gaps as barriers to consistent PPE use, and social desirability bias may explain the discrepancy between self-reported and observed PPE use.</p>","PeriodicalId":10350,"journal":{"name":"Clinical journal of oncology nursing","volume":"30 4","pages":"275-282"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13464523/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical journal of oncology nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1188/26.CJON.275-282","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Environmental services (EVS) workers in healthcare settings are at risk for exposure to hazardous drugs, including antineoplastic drugs, because of their role in cleaning, sanitizing, and disinfecting surfaces where patients have received these drugs. Personal protective equipment (PPE) is critical for minimizing exposure; because oncology nurses rely on EVS partners to maintain safe care environments, inconsistent PPE use has direct implications for team safety and oncology practice.

Objectives: This study aimed to assess PPE use among EVS workers in oncology and non-oncology settings, identify gaps between self-reported and observed PPE use, and explore factors influencing use.

Methods: The team employed a mixed-methods approach, combining observational data with verbally administered questionnaire data. Twelve EVS workers from various units participated. Observations of PPE use and responses to adapted survey instruments provided insights into practices and perceptions.

Findings: Results revealed discrepancies between self-reported and observed PPE use, and participants frequently overestimated use. Participants commonly wore gloves, but they underused gloves tested for use with hazardous drugs, particularly in oncology settings. The team identified training gaps as barriers to consistent PPE use, and social desirability bias may explain the discrepancy between self-reported and observed PPE use.

医院环境服务人员个人防护装备使用评估
背景:卫生保健机构的环境服务(EVS)工作人员有暴露于危险药物(包括抗肿瘤药物)的风险,因为他们在清洁、消毒和消毒患者使用这些药物的表面方面发挥作用。个人防护装备(PPE)对于尽量减少接触至关重要;由于肿瘤护士依靠EVS合作伙伴来维持安全的护理环境,不一致的个人防护装备使用对团队安全和肿瘤实践具有直接影响。目的:本研究旨在评估肿瘤和非肿瘤环境中EVS工作人员的PPE使用情况,确定自我报告和观察到的PPE使用情况之间的差距,并探讨影响PPE使用的因素。方法:该团队采用混合方法,将观察数据与口头问卷调查数据相结合。来自各单位的电动汽车工人共12人参加。对个人防护装备使用情况的观察和对调整后的调查工具的反应提供了对实践和观念的见解。结果显示,自我报告的PPE使用情况与观察到的PPE使用情况存在差异,参与者经常高估使用情况。参与者通常戴手套,但他们没有充分使用手套进行危险药物的使用测试,特别是在肿瘤环境中。研究小组认为,培训差距是持续使用个人防护装备的障碍,社会期望偏见可能解释了自我报告和观察到的个人防护装备使用之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
127
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing (CJON) is an official publication of the Oncology Nursing Society (ONS) and is directed to the practicing nurse specializing in the care of patients with an actual or potential diagnosis of cancer. CJON is a vehicle to promote the mission of ONS, which is to advance excellence in oncology nursing and quality cancer care. The CJON mission is twofold: to provide practical information necessary to care for patients and their families across the cancer continuum and to develop publication skills in oncology nurses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书