Impact of Population-Specific Phenytoin Correction Factors on Estimation of Free Phenytoin Concentrations in a Community Teaching Hospital.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Abriana M Palumbo, Andrew Soliman, Kaysey Cloud, Khang Tran, Saeed K Alzghari, Margarita Taburyanskaya
{"title":"Impact of Population-Specific Phenytoin Correction Factors on Estimation of Free Phenytoin Concentrations in a Community Teaching Hospital.","authors":"Abriana M Palumbo, Andrew Soliman, Kaysey Cloud, Khang Tran, Saeed K Alzghari, Margarita Taburyanskaya","doi":"10.1177/10600280261470029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Phenytoin is a highly protein-bound medication and monitored due to its narrow therapeutic range. Free phenytoin serum concentratinos (fPHT<sub>m</sub>) are not readily available in many institutions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether population-specific correction factors (CFs) improve estimated free phenytoin serum concentrations (fPHTe) compared with traditional Winter-Tozer CF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective review included adults with same-day measured total phenytoin serum concentrations (mPHT), fPHT<sub>m</sub>, albumin, and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) values. Patients were stratified by active/breakthrough seizures, intermittent hemodialysis (IHD), or adults younger than 65. Patient-specific fPHT<sub>m</sub> percentages were used in the estimation of fPHTe.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 126 phenytoin levels reviewed, 66 met inclusion criteria. Population-specific CFs demonstrated lower bias and greater precision. In patients with active/breakthrough seizures and BUN <50 mg/dL, CF 0.29 improved accuracy compared with CF 0.2 (reduced mean percentage error [MPE] -59.59 vs -111.99 - indicating overprediction, root mean square error [RMSE] 1.79 vs 2.91), with similar trends when BUN exceeded 50 g/dL. A preliminary finding among adult patients younger than 65 showed better performance with a CF 0.275 than CF 0.2, with lower MPE (-40.43 vs -78.98) and RMSE (1.32 vs 2.16). In the IHD cohort, CF 0.201 outperformed CF 0.1 (MPE -74.40 vs -197.53 and RMSE 2.07 vs 5.32).</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>Population-specific CF estimated fPHT<sub>e</sub> more accurately and precisely than traditional CF. Findings remain preliminary due to limited representation, and further research is needed to improve CF selection across various subgroups.</p>","PeriodicalId":7933,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"10600280261470029"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10600280261470029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Phenytoin is a highly protein-bound medication and monitored due to its narrow therapeutic range. Free phenytoin serum concentratinos (fPHTm) are not readily available in many institutions.

Objective: To evaluate whether population-specific correction factors (CFs) improve estimated free phenytoin serum concentrations (fPHTe) compared with traditional Winter-Tozer CF.

Methods: This retrospective review included adults with same-day measured total phenytoin serum concentrations (mPHT), fPHTm, albumin, and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) values. Patients were stratified by active/breakthrough seizures, intermittent hemodialysis (IHD), or adults younger than 65. Patient-specific fPHTm percentages were used in the estimation of fPHTe.

Results: Of 126 phenytoin levels reviewed, 66 met inclusion criteria. Population-specific CFs demonstrated lower bias and greater precision. In patients with active/breakthrough seizures and BUN <50 mg/dL, CF 0.29 improved accuracy compared with CF 0.2 (reduced mean percentage error [MPE] -59.59 vs -111.99 - indicating overprediction, root mean square error [RMSE] 1.79 vs 2.91), with similar trends when BUN exceeded 50 g/dL. A preliminary finding among adult patients younger than 65 showed better performance with a CF 0.275 than CF 0.2, with lower MPE (-40.43 vs -78.98) and RMSE (1.32 vs 2.16). In the IHD cohort, CF 0.201 outperformed CF 0.1 (MPE -74.40 vs -197.53 and RMSE 2.07 vs 5.32).

Conclusion and relevance: Population-specific CF estimated fPHTe more accurately and precisely than traditional CF. Findings remain preliminary due to limited representation, and further research is needed to improve CF selection across various subgroups.

人群特异性苯妥英校正因子对社区教学医院游离苯妥英浓度估算的影响
背景:苯妥英是一种高度蛋白结合的药物,因其治疗范围窄而受到监测。游离苯妥英血清浓度(fPHTm)在许多机构不容易获得。目的:评价与传统的Winter-Tozer校正因子相比,人群特异性校正因子(CFs)是否能改善估计的游离苯妥英血清浓度(fPHTe)。方法:本回顾性研究纳入了当天测量的总苯妥英血清浓度(mPHT)、fPHTm、白蛋白和血尿素氮(BUN)值的成年人。患者按主动/突破性癫痫发作、间歇性血液透析(IHD)或年龄小于65岁的成年人进行分层。使用患者特异性fPHTm百分比来估计fPHTe。结果:在126个苯妥英水平中,66个符合纳入标准。人群特异性CFs显示出更低的偏差和更高的精度。结论和相关性:人群特异性CF比传统CF更准确和精确地估计fPHTe。由于代表性有限,研究结果仍处于初步阶段,需要进一步研究来改善不同亚组的CF选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
166
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Pharmacotherapy (AOP) is a peer-reviewed journal that advances pharmacotherapy throughout the world by publishing high-quality research and review articles to achieve the most desired health outcomes.The articles provide cutting-edge information about the most efficient, safe and cost-effective pharmacotherapy for the treatment and prevention of various illnesses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 14 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书