Contraceptive dissatisfaction among women in Sweden: a cross-sectional survey.

IF 2
Moa Karberg, Tanja Tydén, Cerisa Obern, Inger Sundström Poromaa, Helena Kopp Kallner
{"title":"Contraceptive dissatisfaction among women in Sweden: a cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Moa Karberg, Tanja Tydén, Cerisa Obern, Inger Sundström Poromaa, Helena Kopp Kallner","doi":"10.1080/13625187.2026.2711277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess contraceptive dissatisfaction and examine its correlation with contraceptive methods and demographic factors in a Swedish population. Intention to switch methods was also assessed as a secondary measure of dissatisfaction.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Women in Sweden aged 15-45 who attended midwifery and gynaecology clinics across 14 regions of Sweden answered an online questionnaire on contraception and reproductive health. Dissatisfaction and switching intention were assessed using Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test and univariate logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 874 women included in the analysis, 12.9% were dissatisfied with their contraceptive method. Dissatisfaction was 7.9% for short-acting reversible contraception (SARC), 10.4% for intrauterine devices, 13.3% for barrier methods, 31.6% for implant and 29.7% for other methods. Highest levels of dissatisfaction were found for emergency contraception pill (46.2% dissatisfied) and implant (31.6%). Unadjusted odds ratio for dissatisfaction with implant was 5.78 (CI 3.18-10.49) compared to SARC as reference. No demographic factor was correlated with dissatisfaction. Three out of ten reported an intention to switch methods. For most contraceptives, switching intention rate aligned with dissatisfaction level.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most women are satisfied with their contraceptive method, but dissatisfaction differs significantly between methods. Efforts should be made to strengthen individualised contraceptive counselling in order to further decrease dissatisfaction levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":520795,"journal":{"name":"The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2026.2711277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess contraceptive dissatisfaction and examine its correlation with contraceptive methods and demographic factors in a Swedish population. Intention to switch methods was also assessed as a secondary measure of dissatisfaction.

Materials and methods: Women in Sweden aged 15-45 who attended midwifery and gynaecology clinics across 14 regions of Sweden answered an online questionnaire on contraception and reproductive health. Dissatisfaction and switching intention were assessed using Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test and univariate logistic regression.

Results: Of the 874 women included in the analysis, 12.9% were dissatisfied with their contraceptive method. Dissatisfaction was 7.9% for short-acting reversible contraception (SARC), 10.4% for intrauterine devices, 13.3% for barrier methods, 31.6% for implant and 29.7% for other methods. Highest levels of dissatisfaction were found for emergency contraception pill (46.2% dissatisfied) and implant (31.6%). Unadjusted odds ratio for dissatisfaction with implant was 5.78 (CI 3.18-10.49) compared to SARC as reference. No demographic factor was correlated with dissatisfaction. Three out of ten reported an intention to switch methods. For most contraceptives, switching intention rate aligned with dissatisfaction level.

Conclusions: Most women are satisfied with their contraceptive method, but dissatisfaction differs significantly between methods. Efforts should be made to strengthen individualised contraceptive counselling in order to further decrease dissatisfaction levels.

瑞典妇女避孕不满意:一项横断面调查。
目的:评估避孕不满意程度,并检查其与瑞典人口中避孕方法和人口因素的关系。转换方法的意向也被评估为不满意的第二项指标。材料和方法:在瑞典14个地区的助产和妇科诊所就诊的15-45岁瑞典妇女回答了一份关于避孕和生殖健康的在线问卷。采用卡方检验、Fisher精确检验和单变量logistic回归评估不满意程度和转换意愿。结果:纳入分析的874名妇女中,12.9%对避孕方法不满意。短效可逆避孕(SARC)的不满意率为7.9%,宫内节育器为10.4%,屏障法为13.3%,植入法为31.6%,其他方法为29.7%。不满意程度最高的是紧急避孕药(46.2%)和植入物(31.6%)。与对照的SARC相比,种植体不满意的未调整优势比为5.78 (CI 3.18-10.49)。不满意与人口统计学因素无关。十分之三的人表示有意改变方法。对于大多数避孕药具,转换意愿率与不满意程度一致。结论:大多数妇女对避孕方法满意,但不同避孕方法的不满意程度差异显著。应努力加强个性化避孕咨询,以进一步降低不满意程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书