The lived complexity of phantom limb telescoping: insights from a qualitative study.

IF 2.5 Q3 REHABILITATION
Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences Pub Date : 2026-07-21 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fresc.2026.1747066
Andrea Aternali, Heather Lumsden-Ruegg, Nicole Dimitrova, Lora Appel, Sander L Hitzig, Amanda L Mayo, Joel Katz
{"title":"The lived complexity of phantom limb telescoping: insights from a qualitative study.","authors":"Andrea Aternali, Heather Lumsden-Ruegg, Nicole Dimitrova, Lora Appel, Sander L Hitzig, Amanda L Mayo, Joel Katz","doi":"10.3389/fresc.2026.1747066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Phantom limb telescoping, the perceived shortening of a missing limb, remains an underexplored phenomenon despite its relatively frequent occurrence after limb loss. Existing literature has focused on quantitative or neurophysiological approaches, with limited attention to lived experience. This study examined first-person accounts of telescoping among 12 participants with limb loss (11 men, one woman; mean age 50.1 years; mean 3.9 years post-amputation) using semi-structured interviews. The aim was to explore the lived experience of phantom limb telescoping among people who have undergone limb amputation, including their interpretations of telescoping, the emotional responses it evoked, and its impact on post-amputation adaptation. Data were analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis within a constructionist framework. Four themes were identified: <i>(1) Heterogeneity in the experience of telescoping, (2) Telescoping as unusual but not distressing, (3) Social and emotional consequences of living with telescoping,</i> and <i>(4) Adaptation to an altered phantom limb.</i> Participants described telescoping as unusual but not distressing. Participants described feeling more concerned by factors related to post-amputation adjustment or phantom limb pain than the sensation of having a shorter phantom limb. Participants reported rarely discussing telescoping with social supports or healthcare providers. Their experience of telescoping varied in onset and presentation and were shaped by psychological and social factors. These findings support the suggestion that patients may benefit from education on telescoping soon after amputation and open discussions with healthcare providers to normalize telescoping and reduce feelings of uncertainty surrounding this sensation. Integrating patient-centered qualitative insights into rehabilitation may better address the full spectrum of post-amputation experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":73102,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","volume":"7 ","pages":"1747066"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13433351/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2026.1747066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Phantom limb telescoping, the perceived shortening of a missing limb, remains an underexplored phenomenon despite its relatively frequent occurrence after limb loss. Existing literature has focused on quantitative or neurophysiological approaches, with limited attention to lived experience. This study examined first-person accounts of telescoping among 12 participants with limb loss (11 men, one woman; mean age 50.1 years; mean 3.9 years post-amputation) using semi-structured interviews. The aim was to explore the lived experience of phantom limb telescoping among people who have undergone limb amputation, including their interpretations of telescoping, the emotional responses it evoked, and its impact on post-amputation adaptation. Data were analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis within a constructionist framework. Four themes were identified: (1) Heterogeneity in the experience of telescoping, (2) Telescoping as unusual but not distressing, (3) Social and emotional consequences of living with telescoping, and (4) Adaptation to an altered phantom limb. Participants described telescoping as unusual but not distressing. Participants described feeling more concerned by factors related to post-amputation adjustment or phantom limb pain than the sensation of having a shorter phantom limb. Participants reported rarely discussing telescoping with social supports or healthcare providers. Their experience of telescoping varied in onset and presentation and were shaped by psychological and social factors. These findings support the suggestion that patients may benefit from education on telescoping soon after amputation and open discussions with healthcare providers to normalize telescoping and reduce feelings of uncertainty surrounding this sensation. Integrating patient-centered qualitative insights into rehabilitation may better address the full spectrum of post-amputation experiences.

幻肢伸缩的生活复杂性:来自定性研究的见解。
幻肢伸缩式,即缺失肢体的缩短,尽管在肢体丧失后发生的频率相对较高,但仍然是一个未被充分研究的现象。现有文献集中于定量或神经生理学方法,对生活经验的关注有限。本研究采用半结构化访谈的方式,对12名肢体丧失者(11名男性,1名女性,平均年龄50.1岁,平均截肢后3.9年)的第一人称描述进行了调查。本研究旨在探讨截肢患者幻肢伸缩的生活体验,包括他们对幻肢伸缩的理解、幻肢伸缩引发的情绪反应以及幻肢伸缩对截肢后适应的影响。数据分析使用归纳主题分析在一个建构主义框架。研究确定了四个主题:(1)伸缩术体验的异质性;(2)伸缩术是不寻常的,但并不痛苦;(3)伸缩术生活的社会和情感后果;(4)适应改变的幻肢。参与者称,伸缩是不寻常的,但并不令人痛苦。参与者更关心截肢后的调整或幻肢疼痛,而不是幻肢变短的感觉。与会者报告说,很少讨论与社会支持或保健提供者的沟通。她们的伸缩经历在发病和表现上各不相同,并受到心理和社会因素的影响。这些发现支持了这样一种建议,即截肢后患者可能会从伸直教育中受益,并与医疗保健提供者进行公开讨论,使伸直正常化,减少围绕这种感觉的不确定感。将以患者为中心的定性见解整合到康复中,可以更好地解决截肢后经历的全部问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书