Patient Perspectives on Accessing Medication Abortion at a Family Medicine-Led Community Health Center: An Opportunity for Person-Centered Care.

IF 1.8 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) Pub Date : 2026-01-30 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26884844261418112
Catherine Hennessey, Lorna Sanchez, Gabriela Betancourt, Julie Chor, Debra Stulberg
{"title":"Patient Perspectives on Accessing Medication Abortion at a Family Medicine-Led Community Health Center: An Opportunity for Person-Centered Care.","authors":"Catherine Hennessey, Lorna Sanchez, Gabriela Betancourt, Julie Chor, Debra Stulberg","doi":"10.1177/26884844261418112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore how patients who received care for early pregnancy loss (EPL) at a family medicine-led federally qualified health center (FQHC) felt about hypothetical access to medication abortion at the clinic.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We elicited patient perspectives on hypothetical access to medication abortion from their primary care provider <i>via</i> semistructured phone interviews with patients treated for EPL at one FQHC in Illinois that was using mifepristone for EPL but not abortion. The transcripts were coded using Atlas.ti and analyzed inductively. Participant demographics, including age, race, ethnicity, religion, obstetrical history, and EPL management route (expectant, medical, procedural) were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We interviewed 16 patients from June to December 2022. Participants felt that offering medication abortion in the primary care setting is an opportunity for person-centered care, specifically that the primary care clinic was well equipped to provide safe, accessible care from trusted providers who respect patient autonomy. They expressed a range of feelings about abortion and, regardless of personal abortion attitude, believed that medication abortion should be offered in the primary care setting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients receiving care for EPL at a family medicine-led FQHC expressed a range of personal views about abortion but commonly supported offering medication abortion at their clinic.</p>","PeriodicalId":75329,"journal":{"name":"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","volume":"7 ","pages":"26884844261418112"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13434885/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26884844261418112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore how patients who received care for early pregnancy loss (EPL) at a family medicine-led federally qualified health center (FQHC) felt about hypothetical access to medication abortion at the clinic.

Study design: We elicited patient perspectives on hypothetical access to medication abortion from their primary care provider via semistructured phone interviews with patients treated for EPL at one FQHC in Illinois that was using mifepristone for EPL but not abortion. The transcripts were coded using Atlas.ti and analyzed inductively. Participant demographics, including age, race, ethnicity, religion, obstetrical history, and EPL management route (expectant, medical, procedural) were collected.

Results: We interviewed 16 patients from June to December 2022. Participants felt that offering medication abortion in the primary care setting is an opportunity for person-centered care, specifically that the primary care clinic was well equipped to provide safe, accessible care from trusted providers who respect patient autonomy. They expressed a range of feelings about abortion and, regardless of personal abortion attitude, believed that medication abortion should be offered in the primary care setting.

Conclusions: Patients receiving care for EPL at a family medicine-led FQHC expressed a range of personal views about abortion but commonly supported offering medication abortion at their clinic.

在家庭医学主导的社区卫生中心获得药物流产的患者观点:一个以人为本的护理机会。
目的:探讨在家庭医学主导的联邦合格医疗中心(FQHC)接受早孕流产(EPL)护理的患者对在诊所进行药物流产的假想机会的感受。研究设计:我们通过对伊利诺伊州一家FQHC中使用米非司酮治疗EPL但不堕胎的EPL患者进行半结构化电话访谈,得出患者对从初级保健提供者获得药物流产的假设途径的看法。转录本是用Atlas编码的。并对其进行了电感分析。收集参与者的人口统计资料,包括年龄、种族、民族、宗教、产科史和EPL管理途径(期待、医疗、程序)。结果:我们于2022年6月至12月访问了16例患者。与会者认为,在初级保健环境中提供药物流产是一个以人为本的护理机会,特别是初级保健诊所配备齐全,可以从尊重患者自主权的值得信赖的提供者那里提供安全、方便的护理。他们表达了对堕胎的一系列感受,无论个人对堕胎的态度如何,都认为应该在初级保健机构提供药物堕胎。结论:在家庭医学主导的FQHC中接受EPL治疗的患者表达了一系列关于流产的个人观点,但普遍支持在诊所提供药物流产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书