Potentially Avoidable Spine Transfers to a Level I Trauma Center: A Five-Year Retrospective Analysis.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Clifford M Marks, Ryan C Burke, Cody Rasner, Martina Stippler, Carlo L Rosen
{"title":"Potentially Avoidable Spine Transfers to a Level I Trauma Center: A Five-Year Retrospective Analysis.","authors":"Clifford M Marks, Ryan C Burke, Cody Rasner, Martina Stippler, Carlo L Rosen","doi":"10.5811/westjem.47485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency physicians frequently transfer patients with spine pathology to tertiary-care centers, although research suggests many are discharged without requiring a procedure or specialized imaging. Such transfers consume resources and remove patients from their families and communities. Better understanding these transfers might help identify which patients can receive care without transfer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of transfers for spine evaluation to an urban, tertiary-care, Level I trauma center from October 1, 2017-October 1, 2022. Transfers were defined as necessary if the patient a) went to the operating room (OR) within 12 hours of arrival, b) had a neurologic magnetic resonance image (MRI), c) was admitted to an intensive care unit from the emergency department (ED), or d) was admitted to either neurology or a surgical service (including neurosurgery and orthopedics, which share spine coverage in the study hospital).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 1,918 transfers with a spine evaluation, of which 617 (32.2%) were deemed potentially avoidable. Just 3.3% of all transfers went to the OR within 12 hours of receiving ED arrival, 45.7% had a neurologic MRI at the receiving hospital, and 36.6% were admitted to a neurology or a surgical service. For all transfers, 17.7% were discharged directly from the ED, 16.8% were placed in observation and then discharged, 6.8% were placed in observation and then admitted, and 58.7% were admitted to inpatient from the ED. The average ED length of stay for necessary spine transfers was 15.4 hours vs 16.6 hours for potentially avoidable transfers (P = .07). Compared to the overall rate of necessary transfers (67.8%), patients with the following conditions had a decreased incidence of necessary transfers: cervical spine fractures (62% necessary, P = .008), lumbar spine/sacrum/coccyx fractures (53.5% necessary, P < .001), and disc disorders (51.4% necessary, P = .003). Patients diagnosed with cervical spinal cord lesions (91.7% necessary, P = .01) had an increased incidence of necessary transfers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nearly one-third of spine evaluation transfers were potentially avoidable. Patients transferred for spine evaluation experienced prolonged ED stays, creating challenges for both receiving hospitals and patients. Further research is needed to prospectively identify patients who do not require tertiary care and to study methods for managing them in community settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"27 4","pages":"930-937"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13436667/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.47485","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Emergency physicians frequently transfer patients with spine pathology to tertiary-care centers, although research suggests many are discharged without requiring a procedure or specialized imaging. Such transfers consume resources and remove patients from their families and communities. Better understanding these transfers might help identify which patients can receive care without transfer.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of transfers for spine evaluation to an urban, tertiary-care, Level I trauma center from October 1, 2017-October 1, 2022. Transfers were defined as necessary if the patient a) went to the operating room (OR) within 12 hours of arrival, b) had a neurologic magnetic resonance image (MRI), c) was admitted to an intensive care unit from the emergency department (ED), or d) was admitted to either neurology or a surgical service (including neurosurgery and orthopedics, which share spine coverage in the study hospital).

Results: The study included 1,918 transfers with a spine evaluation, of which 617 (32.2%) were deemed potentially avoidable. Just 3.3% of all transfers went to the OR within 12 hours of receiving ED arrival, 45.7% had a neurologic MRI at the receiving hospital, and 36.6% were admitted to a neurology or a surgical service. For all transfers, 17.7% were discharged directly from the ED, 16.8% were placed in observation and then discharged, 6.8% were placed in observation and then admitted, and 58.7% were admitted to inpatient from the ED. The average ED length of stay for necessary spine transfers was 15.4 hours vs 16.6 hours for potentially avoidable transfers (P = .07). Compared to the overall rate of necessary transfers (67.8%), patients with the following conditions had a decreased incidence of necessary transfers: cervical spine fractures (62% necessary, P = .008), lumbar spine/sacrum/coccyx fractures (53.5% necessary, P < .001), and disc disorders (51.4% necessary, P = .003). Patients diagnosed with cervical spinal cord lesions (91.7% necessary, P = .01) had an increased incidence of necessary transfers.

Conclusion: Nearly one-third of spine evaluation transfers were potentially avoidable. Patients transferred for spine evaluation experienced prolonged ED stays, creating challenges for both receiving hospitals and patients. Further research is needed to prospectively identify patients who do not require tertiary care and to study methods for managing them in community settings.

潜在可避免的脊柱转移到一级创伤中心:一项五年回顾性分析。
背景:急诊医生经常将脊柱病变患者转移到三级护理中心,尽管研究表明许多患者出院时不需要手术或专门的影像学检查。这种转移消耗资源,并使患者离开其家庭和社区。更好地了解这些转移可能有助于确定哪些患者可以在不转移的情况下接受治疗。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,从2017年10月1日至2022年10月1日,转移到城市三级护理一级创伤中心进行脊柱评估。如果患者a)在到达后12小时内前往手术室(OR), b)进行神经系统磁共振成像(MRI), c)从急诊科(ED)入住重症监护病房,或d)入住神经内科或外科(包括神经外科和骨科,它们在研究医院共享脊柱覆盖),则转移被定义为必要。结果:该研究包括1,918例脊柱评估转移,其中617例(32.2%)被认为是潜在可避免的。只有3.3%的患者在急救室到达后12小时内转到手术室,45.7%的患者在接收医院进行了神经MRI检查,36.6%的患者接受了神经内科或外科服务。在所有转院中,17.7%的患者直接从急诊科出院,16.8%的患者先观察后出院,6.8%的患者先观察后住院,58.7%的患者从急诊科住院。必要的脊柱转院的平均住院时间为15.4小时,而可能避免的转院的平均住院时间为16.6小时(P = 0.07)。与总体必要转移率(67.8%)相比,以下情况的患者必要转移发生率降低:颈椎骨折(62%必要,P = 0.008),腰椎/骶骨/尾骨骨折(53.5%必要,P < 0.001),椎间盘疾病(51.4%必要,P = 0.003)。诊断为颈脊髓病变的患者(91.7%必要,P = 0.01)必要转移的发生率增加。结论:近三分之一的脊柱评估转移是可以避免的。接受脊柱评估的患者在急诊科的停留时间较长,这给接收医院和患者都带来了挑战。需要进一步的研究来前瞻性地确定不需要三级保健的患者,并研究在社区环境中管理这些患者的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
125
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: WestJEM focuses on how the systems and delivery of emergency care affects health, health disparities, and health outcomes in communities and populations worldwide, including the impact of social conditions on the composition of patients seeking care in emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书